Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Fractional Mean Curvature

Updated 6 July 2026
  • Fractional mean curvature is a nonlocal analogue of classical mean curvature, defined via a principal-value singular integral that accounts for the global geometry of a set.
  • It originates from the first variation of fractional perimeter functionals and provides the Euler–Lagrange framework for hypersurfaces with constant nonlocal curvature.
  • This concept underpins nonlocal geometric flows and anisotropic models, converging to traditional curvature in the local limit and supporting stability and regularity analyses.

Fractional mean curvature is the nonlocal analogue of classical mean curvature associated with the first variation of a fractional perimeter. For a sufficiently regular set ERnE\subset \mathbb R^n and a boundary point xEx\in\partial E, it is defined through a principal-value singular integral of the jump of χE\chi_E across E\partial E, so its value depends on the whole geometry of EE rather than only on local second-order data. This quantity enters Euler–Lagrange equations for critical points of fractional perimeters, generates nonlocal geometric flows, admits anisotropic and fixed-boundary variants, and converges to classical mean curvature after the standard renormalization as the fractional order approaches $1$ (Sáez et al., 2015, Cesaroni et al., 2020).

1. Definitions and sign conventions

A standard isotropic definition for the ss-fractional mean curvature, with s(0,1)s\in(0,1), is

Hs(x,E)=PV ⁣RnχEc(y)χE(y)xyn+sdy,H_s(x,E)=\mathrm{PV}\!\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{\chi_{E^c}(y)-\chi_E(y)}{|x-y|^{n+s}}\,dy,

possibly multiplied by a normalization factor such as Cn,sC_{n,s} or xEx\in\partial E0, depending on the paper. Equivalent forms include a surface integral over xEx\in\partial E1, obtained by the divergence theorem, for instance

xEx\in\partial E2

again up to normalization and sign. The principal value is essential because the kernel is singular at xEx\in\partial E3. Several papers emphasize that sign conventions differ: some write xEx\in\partial E4, others xEx\in\partial E5, and some choose the sign so that convex sets have nonnegative curvature (Cabre et al., 2016, Sáez et al., 2015, Julin et al., 2023).

A related surface formula, used in the study of fractional Willmore-type energies, writes the curvature at xEx\in\partial E6 as

xEx\in\partial E7

with xEx\in\partial E8 the exterior unit normal, and with xEx\in\partial E9 chosen so that χE\chi_E0, the classical mean curvature (Blatt et al., 2023). For hypersurfaces with boundary, Onoue uses a more general definition in terms of measurable interior and exterior regions χE\chi_E1 and χE\chi_E2 attached to a point χE\chi_E3, namely

χE\chi_E4

which recovers the usual indicator-function formula when χE\chi_E5 is a closed smooth hypersurface (Onoue, 2023).

An anisotropic analogue replaces the Euclidean kernel by a convex, even, one-homogeneous norm χE\chi_E6 satisfying χE\chi_E7. In that setting Chambolle, Novaga, and Ruffini define

χE\chi_E8

or equivalently χE\chi_E9, with the convention that convex sets have E\partial E0 (Chambolle et al., 2016).

2. Variational origin and associated energies

Fractional mean curvature arises as the first variation of fractional perimeter functionals. In the isotropic case one writes, up to normalization,

E\partial E1

or equivalently

E\partial E2

If E\partial E3 is a deformation of E\partial E4 with normal speed E\partial E5, then the first variation is

E\partial E6

again with the appropriate convention for the sign. Under a volume constraint, criticality is therefore equivalent to constancy of the nonlocal mean curvature on the boundary: E\partial E7 This is the Euler–Lagrange condition used in the construction of nonlocal Delaunay hypersurfaces and multiply periodic constant-nonlocal-mean-curvature hypersurfaces (Cabre et al., 2016, Minlend et al., 2018, Cinti et al., 2018).

For compact manifolds with fixed boundary, the first variation contains an interior term involving E\partial E8 and a boundary term on E\partial E9. When variations vanish on EE0, the boundary term disappears, and stationarity is equivalent to

EE1

This is the Euler–Lagrange equation for the fractional area functional introduced by Paroni, Podio-Guidugli, and Seguin and analyzed by Onoue (Onoue, 2023).

A higher-order functional built from fractional mean curvature is the fractional Willmore-type energy

EE2

Under the dilation EE3, this scales as

EE4

so the critical exponent is EE5, and the subcritical regime is EE6. In the convex setting, the paper on this functional identifies EE7 with a nonlocal bending energy EE8 and derives local graph control, lower Ahlfors-regularity, a weak Michael–Simon inequality, and a stability statement toward spheres (Blatt et al., 2023).

3. Fractional mean curvature flows

The basic geometric evolution prescribes that the normal velocity equals minus the fractional mean curvature: EE9 In star-shaped and graphical parametrizations this becomes, respectively,

$1$0

and

$1$1

For smooth solutions Sáez and Valdinoci established a comparison principle, uniqueness, finite-time extinction for compact data, the evolution formula for the fractional perimeter,

$1$2

and an evolution equation for $1$3 featuring a nonlocal diffusion term plus a nonnegative normal-difference term (Sáez et al., 2015).

In the volume-preserving variant one evolves by

$1$4

where

$1$5

This choice enforces $1$6. Julin and La Manna proved that if $1$7 is convex, $1$8, and has the same volume as the unit ball, then the classical solution exists for all $1$9 and converges exponentially fast to a translate of ss0; after a time ss1, one can write

ss2

with

ss3

Their proof upgrades a priori bounds to ss4, then to ss5, and concludes that no finite-time singularity occurs for convex data (Julin et al., 2023).

Weak and discrete formulations are central in the nonlocal setting. Chambolle, Novaga, and Ruffini introduced an anisotropic threshold-dynamics scheme based on

ss6

and the one-step map

ss7

As ss8, the piecewise-constant approximation converges locally uniformly to the unique viscosity solution of the level-set PDE

ss9

where

s(0,1)s\in(0,1)0

This gives a consistent threshold-dynamics approximation for anisotropic fractional mean curvature flow with a continuous time-dependent forcing term (Chambolle et al., 2016).

Graphical and boundary-value settings lead to further variants. For entire Lipschitz graphs, the graph equation is a quasilinear integro-differential parabolic equation of order s(0,1)s\in(0,1)1, with kernel bounds s(0,1)s\in(0,1)2; the corresponding level-set formulation admits a unique global viscosity solution for bounded uniformly continuous initial data, preserves Lipschitz constants, and smooths Lipschitz graphs to s(0,1)s\in(0,1)3 for any positive time (Cesaroni et al., 2021). If an initial open set lies between two parallel Lipschitz subgraphs, then after a universal time s(0,1)s\in(0,1)4 the minimal viscosity supersolution becomes exactly the subgraph of a s(0,1)s\in(0,1)5-Lipschitz function, with

s(0,1)s\in(0,1)6

a regularizing effect that the paper states is false for the classical mean curvature flow (Cameron, 2019). Short-time classical existence for bounded s(0,1)s\in(0,1)7 initial hypersurfaces, with the same result for the volume-preserving flow, was established by Julin and La Manna through a fractional Schauder fixed-point argument (Julin et al., 2019). A capillary version in the half-space, with constant contact angle s(0,1)s\in(0,1)8, was later formulated as

s(0,1)s\in(0,1)9

and reduced, in radial variables, to a nonlocal scalar PDE on Hs(x,E)=PV ⁣RnχEc(y)χE(y)xyn+sdy,H_s(x,E)=\mathrm{PV}\!\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{\chi_{E^c}(y)-\chi_E(y)}{|x-y|^{n+s}}\,dy,0 with boundary condition

Hs(x,E)=PV ⁣RnχEc(y)χE(y)xyn+sdy,H_s(x,E)=\mathrm{PV}\!\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{\chi_{E^c}(y)-\chi_E(y)}{|x-y|^{n+s}}\,dy,1

short-time existence follows from a contraction argument (Fan et al., 8 Feb 2026).

4. Stationary hypersurfaces and constant nonlocal mean curvature

Critical points of fractional perimeter under a volume constraint are hypersurfaces with constant nonlocal mean curvature. Cabré, Fall, and Weth proved the existence of a smooth branch of periodic cylinders in Hs(x,E)=PV ⁣RnχEc(y)χE(y)xyn+sdy,H_s(x,E)=\mathrm{PV}\!\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{\chi_{E^c}(y)-\chi_E(y)}{|x-y|^{n+s}}\,dy,2, Hs(x,E)=PV ⁣RnχEc(y)χE(y)xyn+sdy,H_s(x,E)=\mathrm{PV}\!\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{\chi_{E^c}(y)-\chi_E(y)}{|x-y|^{n+s}}\,dy,3, all with the same constant nonlocal mean curvature and bifurcating from a straight cylinder. For Hs(x,E)=PV ⁣RnχEc(y)χE(y)xyn+sdy,H_s(x,E)=\mathrm{PV}\!\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{\chi_{E^c}(y)-\chi_E(y)}{|x-y|^{n+s}}\,dy,4, they obtain a family

Hs(x,E)=PV ⁣RnχEc(y)χE(y)xyn+sdy,H_s(x,E)=\mathrm{PV}\!\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{\chi_{E^c}(y)-\chi_E(y)}{|x-y|^{n+s}}\,dy,5

with

Hs(x,E)=PV ⁣RnχEc(y)χE(y)xyn+sdy,H_s(x,E)=\mathrm{PV}\!\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{\chi_{E^c}(y)-\chi_E(y)}{|x-y|^{n+s}}\,dy,6

where Hs(x,E)=PV ⁣RnχEc(y)χE(y)xyn+sdy,H_s(x,E)=\mathrm{PV}\!\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{\chi_{E^c}(y)-\chi_E(y)}{|x-y|^{n+s}}\,dy,7 is even and periodic, Hs(x,E)=PV ⁣RnχEc(y)χE(y)xyn+sdy,H_s(x,E)=\mathrm{PV}\!\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{\chi_{E^c}(y)-\chi_E(y)}{|x-y|^{n+s}}\,dy,8, Hs(x,E)=PV ⁣RnχEc(y)χE(y)xyn+sdy,H_s(x,E)=\mathrm{PV}\!\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{\chi_{E^c}(y)-\chi_E(y)}{|x-y|^{n+s}}\,dy,9 in Cn,sC_{n,s}0, and the nonlocal mean curvature equals Cn,sC_{n,s}1. The proof uses the Crandall–Rabinowitz theorem applied to a quasilinear type fractional elliptic equation (Cabre et al., 2016).

A higher-dimensional periodic analogue was obtained for stacked slabs. Dávila, Del Pino, Dipierro, and Valdinoci construct smooth branches of multiply-periodic hypersurfaces of constant nonlocal mean curvature bifurcating from suitable parallel hyperplanes. Their Lyapunov–Schmidt reduction isolates a one-dimensional kernel in a symmetry-restricted space and produces nontrivial solutions of

Cn,sC_{n,s}2

yielding genuinely non-flat Cn,sC_{n,s}3-periodic hypersurfaces (Minlend et al., 2018).

The zero-curvature case with fixed boundary shows a different rigidity. Onoue proves that if the boundary is a single Cn,sC_{n,s}4-sphere Cn,sC_{n,s}5, then any orientable compact Cn,sC_{n,s}6 manifold Cn,sC_{n,s}7 with Cn,sC_{n,s}8 and Cn,sC_{n,s}9 must coincide with the flat disk

xEx\in\partial E00

For two parallel spherical boundaries xEx\in\partial E01, critical points do not coincide with the two horizontal caps, do not touch the vertical side-wall of the spanning cylinder, and exhibit a gap-dependent topology: for sufficiently large separation xEx\in\partial E02, any critical xEx\in\partial E03 splits into exactly two components xEx\in\partial E04 with xEx\in\partial E05; for sufficiently small gap and xEx\in\partial E06, the two boundaries belong to the same connected component (Onoue, 2023).

5. Convexity, regularity, and geometric inequalities

Convexity plays a central role in the regularity theory. In the anisotropic threshold scheme of Chambolle, Novaga, and Ruffini, each discrete step xEx\in\partial E07 preserves convexity because the kernel xEx\in\partial E08 is a xEx\in\partial E09-concave, integrable radial kernel. Passing to the limit, if all superlevel sets xEx\in\partial E10 are convex, then xEx\in\partial E11 remain convex for all xEx\in\partial E12. For bounded convex initial sets, the same paper proves that the geometric flow with normal velocity xEx\in\partial E13 does not fatten and defines a unique evolution, based on a distance-nondecreasing comparison in the normal direction (Chambolle et al., 2016).

For the volume-preserving flow of smooth convex sets, Cinti, Sinestrari, and Valdinoci show uniform control of the inner and outer radii and a two-sided curvature bound

xEx\in\partial E14

Under a continuation criterion requiring a xEx\in\partial E15 bound from a uniform xEx\in\partial E16 bound, they obtain long-time existence and convergence, up to translation, to a sphere in xEx\in\partial E17. Julin and La Manna later proved that for convex xEx\in\partial E18 initial data the flow does not develop singularities at all and converges exponentially fast to a ball, with the regularity step from xEx\in\partial E19 to xEx\in\partial E20 not relying on convexity (Cinti et al., 2018, Julin et al., 2023).

For entire Lipschitz graphs, a different regularization mechanism is available. The graph flow has an elliptic nonlocal operator of order xEx\in\partial E21, and viscosity solutions become xEx\in\partial E22 for every positive time. If the initial graph is a sublinear perturbation of a cone, then in a rescaled framework the evolution converges in xEx\in\partial E23 to the unique expanding self-similar profile associated to the cone. Hyperplanes are stable, convex cones have homothetic expansions, and any uniformly Lipschitz ancient graphical solution is stationary; in particular, any homothetic shrinking entire Lipschitz graph must be a hyperplane (Cesaroni et al., 2021).

Fractional mean curvature also governs Sobolev and geometric inequalities on convex hypersurfaces. Cabré, Cozzi, and Csató proved a fractional Michael–Simon–Allard inequality: if xEx\in\partial E24 is convex, xEx\in\partial E25, and xEx\in\partial E26, then

xEx\in\partial E27

As an application, for convex smooth fractional mean curvature flow they derive an upper bound for the maximal existence time,

xEx\in\partial E28

depending on the perimeter of the initial set rather than its diameter (Cabre et al., 2020). In the subcritical fractional Willmore setting, if xEx\in\partial E29 is the smooth boundary of a compact convex body, xEx\in\partial E30, and xEx\in\partial E31, then for every xEx\in\partial E32 there is a graph parametrization xEx\in\partial E33 on a ball xEx\in\partial E34 with

xEx\in\partial E35

The paper deduces uniform lower Ahlfors-regularity, a weak Michael–Simon inequality, and a stability theorem asserting Hausdorff closeness to a round sphere under smallness of the support-function deviation in xEx\in\partial E36 (Blatt et al., 2023).

6. Limit regimes, supercritical regularizations, and phase-field derivations

A systematic limit theory clarifies how fractional mean curvature interpolates between nonlocal and local geometries. Cesàroni, De Luca, Novaga, and Ponsiglione prove that for smooth xEx\in\partial E37,

xEx\in\partial E38

where xEx\in\partial E39 is the classical mean curvature. As xEx\in\partial E40,

xEx\in\partial E41

a geometry-independent constant, and after subtraction of xEx\in\partial E42 one obtains a nontrivial zero-order curvature xEx\in\partial E43. The associated level-set flows converge after the corresponding time rescalings: as xEx\in\partial E44, the rescaled fractional flow converges to classical mean curvature flow; as xEx\in\partial E45, the rescaled flow converges first to constant-speed motion and, after subtraction of the leading term, to the flow driven by xEx\in\partial E46 (Cesaroni et al., 2020).

A different local limit comes from supercritical kernels. De Luca, Kubin, and Ponsiglione introduce the core-radius regularized kernel

xEx\in\partial E47

and the regularized curvature

xEx\in\partial E48

With

xEx\in\partial E49

they show

xEx\in\partial E50

and the corresponding nonlocal level-set flows converge, after the time change xEx\in\partial E51, to classical mean-curvature flow. The same construction extends to anisotropic kernels xEx\in\partial E52, recovering anisotropic mean curvature in the limit and including the line-tension energy of planar dislocations as a special case (Luca et al., 2021).

Fractional mean curvature also appears as the sharp interface limit of nonlocal phase-field models. In the derivation based on fractional Laplacians of order xEx\in\partial E53, one compares the xEx\in\partial E54-dimensional operator applied to the layer ansatz xEx\in\partial E55 with the one-dimensional operator satisfied by the profile xEx\in\partial E56, and defines a difference quantity xEx\in\partial E57. The key convergence theorem states that xEx\in\partial E58, where xEx\in\partial E59 is the fractional mean curvature of the interface. In this normalization the curvature is written

xEx\in\partial E60

reflecting the fact that the nonlocal diffusion is parameterized by the Laplacian order xEx\in\partial E61. The same analysis shows that as xEx\in\partial E62 one recovers the classical identity xEx\in\partial E63, and in the fractional Allen–Cahn evolution the moving interface satisfies

xEx\in\partial E64

yielding nonlocal curvature-driven motion for xEx\in\partial E65 and classical mean-curvature motion in the local limit (Patrizi et al., 2024).

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Fractional Mean Curvature.