Extrusion-Based AM Tool Paths

• Extrusion-based AM tool paths are programmed trajectories that convert 3D models into discrete deposition instructions, ensuring geometric fidelity and mechanical performance.
• They incorporate slicing, contour/infill creation, and adaptive bead control to optimize material deposition and reduce defects.
• Advanced algorithmic strategies, including graph optimization, Monte Carlo tree search, and reinforcement learning, enable efficient, stress-aligned, and scalable tool path generation.

Extrusion-based Additive Manufacturing (AM) tool paths refer to the programmed spatial trajectories that control the movement of the printhead or nozzle in processes such as Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), Direct Ink Writing (DIW), and other extrusion-centric technologies. These paths directly determine how material is deposited, thereby governing the geometric accuracy, mechanical properties, efficiency, and defect tolerance of the final printed object. Tool path design in extrusion-based AM encompasses the transformation of digital models into discrete deposition instructions, real-time monitoring and control, optimization for mechanical and process performance, and simulations for predictive process control.

1. Tool Path Generation: Geometric and Physical Principles

Extrusion-based AM tool path generation initiates with the transformation of a 3D digital model into sequential instructions that account for both geometric fidelity and process constraints. This operation generally involves:

• Slicing: Decomposition of the geometry into discrete layers (either planar or non-planar). Conventional approaches use planar slicing, but advanced techniques leverage surface or offset slicing to align material orientation with desired features or stress fields (Guidetti et al., 2023, Zhang et al., 22 Oct 2024).
• Contour and Infill Path Creation: For each layer, outer contours (perimeter paths) and internal infill patterns are defined. Tool paths may be generated to maximize continuity, minimize travel, or realize functional infills such as graded-density structures (Kuipers et al., 2019, Fucile et al., 29 Aug 2025).
• Adaptive Beading and Width Control: Bead width is often varied adaptively across the cross-section to minimize over- and under-fill defects. Medial-axis or union-of-cones analysis is used to decompose cross-sections, and quantization functions allocate an optimal number of beads (extrusion lines) at any local feature width (Kuipers et al., 2020).

Key physical constraints include minimum feature size (governed by nozzle diameter and layer height), allowable overhang angles for self-support, and flow dynamics associated with the extrusion of non-Newtonian viscoelastic materials (Go et al., 2017).

2. Algorithmic Optimization of Tool Paths

State-of-the-art algorithms optimize tool paths for diverse objectives, including build time, material use, mechanical performance, defect minimization, and printability of complex geometries:

• Graph-Based Path Optimization: In architected lattices, graph representations of geometry enable iterative path optimization using modified minimum spanning tree algorithms—e.g., GIPPO utilizes a branching-free Prim’s algorithm variant to maximize continuous path length and minimize the number of interrupted segments, which reduces fabrication time and improves fidelity (Fucile et al., 29 Aug 2025).
• Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS): Toolpath sequencing can be framed as a dependency graph search, where MCTS systematically explores feasible permutations to minimize non-extruding travel, with convergence guarantees on optimality (Yoo et al., 2020).
• Domain Decomposition via Space-Filling Curves: For large and complex print domains, frameworks such as SFCDecomp use space-filling curves (e.g., Hilbert order) to decompose the region into small subdomains solved independently, allowing scalable optimization with respect to Hamiltonian paths, turn minimization, and multi-layer edge overlap (Gupta et al., 2021).
• Global Energy-Based Optimization: Some methods recast tool path optimization as the minimization of an energy functional, where scallop height uniformity and curvature (for smoothness) are encoded. The solution is the family of iso-level curves of a scalar function optimized globally (Zou et al., 2018).
• Reinforcement Learning: Deep RL algorithms can learn optimal toolpath policies by interaction with a simulated environment, dynamically adjusting strategies based on feedback from virtual print outcomes. This is especially relevant for high-dimensional design spaces or sparse, task-specific rewards (Mozaffar et al., 2020).

3. Process Monitoring, Feedback, and Adaptive Control

Tool path execution is not solely an open-loop translation of digital instructions; it increasingly incorporates real-time monitoring and closed-loop control:

• Layerwise Geometric Feedback: Direct integration of 2D laser triangulation scanners enables real-time measurement of the cross-sectional geometry of deposited tracks. Feedback of profile deviations, extracted via fitting parabolic or elliptical models to the laser intensity profile, allows in-process adjustment of extrusion parameters (e.g., dynamic modification of feed rate according to $$z_{new} = z_{old} + K \cdot (z_{measured} - z_{target})$$) (Faes et al., 2016).
• Error Detection and Correction: Online feedback forms the basis for intelligent corrective actions—such as re-slicing, duplicating, or skipping layers—in response to error metrics derived from the deviation between measured and intended geometry. This drives progress toward zero defect additive manufacturing.

Measurement accuracy achieved with such systems is on the order of tens of microns, allowing real-time compensation that significantly tightens the achievable dimensional tolerance and reduces the incidence of out-of-spec parts.

4. Advanced Tool Path Strategies: Non-Planar, Stress-Oriented, and Functional Structures

Recent work leverages knowledge of mechanical loading, material anisotropy, and application-specific requirements to inform toolpath design:

• Stress-Aligned Trajectories for Composites: In continuous fiber-reinforced polymer AM, tool paths are generated to closely follow principal stress fields, obtained from finite element analysis, using field-based approaches. Vector or scalar fields (e.g., 2-RoSy representations) are optimized to resolve orientation ambiguity and maintain compatibility across the domain, particularly near features such as holes where winding must be consistent (Chen et al., 2021, Zhang et al., 22 Oct 2024).
• Non-Planar and Curved Slicing: Algorithms such as quaternion-driven deformation can define non-planar layers whose contour spacing, orientation, and local height are optimized for stress alignment, surface quality, and winding continuity (Guidetti et al., 2023, Zhang et al., 22 Oct 2024). These methods achieve substantial increases in failure load and stiffness, as shown in experimental brackets with LCPs (44× failure strength, 6× stiffness increase).
• High-Density and Graded Infill: CrossFill demonstrates a mathematically-rigorous approach to density-graded, continuous, self-supporting infill with space-filling curves, adaptive cell subdivision, and dithering to reduce quantization artifacts in achieving prescribed local density fields (Kuipers et al., 2019).
• As-Continuous-As-Possible (ACAP) Fabrication: For surface or shell models, toolpath planning frameworks such as ACAP merge surface patches into the largest-possible one-path-patches (OPPs), reducing non-extruding transfer moves by using both flat and curved slicing, with merging strategies formulated using dependency graphs (Zhong et al., 2022).

5. Simulation, Digital Twins, and In Silico Optimization

Process-level simulation frameworks and digital twins are increasingly used to anticipate and optimize toolpath-dependent outcomes:

• Voxelizing Toolpaths for Simulation: G-code is converted into a voxel-by-voxel print schedule, with each path discretized to produce an analysis-suitable geometry for physics-based simulation, particularly of transient thermal fields during deposition. Parallel adaptive octree grids enable scalable simulations of large prints at high resolution, feeding back predictions of heat accumulation and informing parameter adjustments in real time (Gamdha et al., 2023).
• Meshing Frameworks for FEA: Extraction of as-printed geometry—including microstructural details defined by toolpaths—enables generation of robust hexahedral meshes for high-fidelity FEA (quasi-static preloading, modal, or thermal analysis). Direct mapping from toolpath to mesh ensures process-structure-property-performance linkage and enables optimization of infill parameters to tailor mechanical (e.g., modulus, plateau stress) and dynamic (e.g., eigenfrequency) behaviors (Gallup et al., 15 Sep 2025).

Toolpath-aware digital twins make it possible to perform rapid in silico experimentation, reducing reliance on costly physical prototyping and enabling optimization across a rich parameter space not accessible via conventional build-test cycles.

6. Application-Specific Constraints, Materials, and Path-Dependent Process Considerations

Effective tool path generation and control must address materials, geometry, and AM platform-specific constraints:

• Resolution and Surface Quality: For FFF-based ceramic replication, tool path design and polymer precursor selection both affect final ceramic resolution and skin thickness, as the as-deposited extrudate width and retention of preceramic coatings must be considered together (Kulkarni et al., 2019).
• Mechanical and Shape Fidelity in Architected Lattices: GIPPO’s graph-based path optimization for complex lattices reduces the number of continuous paths, minimizes short/overlapping segments, improves local thickness control, and eliminates missing struts. The optimized printing trajectories show marked improvements in both out-of-plane and uniaxial mechanical performance, and can be tailored for planar or non-planar builds with layer-wise infill variation (Fucile et al., 29 Aug 2025).
• Specialized Slicing for Rotational Additive-Lathe Printing: Cylindrical slicing on triangulated surfaces, using concentric cylinders (“slicyls”), allows contour generation suitable for radial, mandrel-based deposition. Precise intersection computation and contour connectivity algorithms yield toolpaths that are developable to planar domains, ensuring compatibility with adaptive planning strategies (Reeser et al., 2019).
• Process Coupling at High Deposition Rates: At elevated build rates, the coupling of extrusion rate, gantry speed, and nozzle dynamics becomes critical. Control laws must be derived (e.g., $V_{print} = BR/(h\cdot d_n)$) to synchronize deposition with motion kinematics, and adaptive deposition must be enacted (e.g., modulating extrusion near sharp turns to minimize overfill) (Go et al., 2017).

7. Mechanical Performance, Multicriteria Optimization, and Emerging Directions

• Mechanical Strength via Tool Path Overlap Control: Multicriteria-optimized toolpath planning (e.g., SFCDecomp) enables direct control of layer-by-layer edge overlap, which in turn governs interlayer tensile strength and fracture behavior. Minimum-overlap strategies have demonstrated tensile strength improvements compared to maximum-overlap strategies, pointing to the importance of path-driven microstructural effects (Gupta et al., 2021).
• Manufacturing Quality and Defect Suppression: The combination of real-time feedback, tool path continuity (reducing non-extruding transfers), path topology guarantees (no self-intersections), and domain decomposition for NP-hard planning problems has resulted in comprehensive suppression of common AM defects—e.g., over/underfilling, surface artifacts, weak interlayer regions, and incomplete infill.
• Integration with Simulation and Design Optimization: Process-structure-property-performance linkage, simulation-based digital twins, and optimization frameworks (e.g., Dakota-Fletcher-Reeves) enable rapid AM process exploration, reducing material waste and accelerating design iteration cycles for high-value, complex components (Gallup et al., 15 Sep 2025, Gamdha et al., 2023).

---

In summary, extrusion-based AM tool paths comprise a multi-faceted domain encompassing geometric computation, path optimization, adaptive control, in-process feedback, and simulation-informed design. The field has advanced from simple planar slicing to include globally optimal, application-specific, stress-aligned, and digitally-twinned strategies, each targeting specific process and product outcomes—dimensional accuracy, mechanical integrity, efficiency, and adaptability to new materials and geometries.