Additive Infilling: Theory & Applications

• Additive Infilling is a framework for filling gaps in data structures, optimizing regularity and consistency in domains from combinatorics to machine learning.
• It employs rigorous methods such as combinatorial compression, cellular topology, and generative modeling to achieve mathematically optimal and computationally efficient solutions.
• Practical applications include infilling for images, text, code, 3D geometry, and toolpath planning, driving innovations in digital manufacturing, VR, and data reconstruction.

The additive infilling problem encompasses the mathematical, algorithmic, and practical task of “filling in” gaps in structures—whether those structures are sets, cycles, images, graphs, text, geometry, or code—such that certain optimality, regularity, or consistency properties are met. This concept appears widely from classical additive combinatorics to modern machine learning applications, and its precise instantiation depends on the domain: infilling sumsets, reconstructing missing data, interpolating motion, infilling narrative text, generating toolpaths for manufacturing, and synthesizing code. This article reviews the problem through its formal definitions, key theoretical results, methodological approaches, and applications as presented in contemporary research.

1. Mathematical Formulations and Theoretical Foundations

At the center of classical additive infilling, the Minkowski sumset $A + B = \{a + b: a \in A, b \in B\}$ quantifies how two sets combine additively. The combinatorial infilling problem concerns the minimal or maximal structure achievable by these combinations. For finite $A, B \subset \mathbb{R}^2$ covered by $m, n$ parallel lines, the sharp cardinality bound (Freiman et al., 2011) is

$$|A+B| \geq \left(\frac{|A|}{m} + \frac{|B|}{n} - 1\right)(m + n - 1),$$

with equality precisely when $A$ and $B$ have a trapezoidal structure with vertical sections as arithmetic progressions. This traps additive evolution in a strict combinatorial framework: extremal structures for additive infilling must look like discrete or stretched trapezoids.

Analogously, in cellular topology, the “filling problem in the cube” (Dotterrer, 2012) establishes explicit isoperimetric bounds for filling $k$-cycles $z$ in the $n$-cube with $(k+1)$-chains $y$: $\|y\| \leq c_k \|z\|^{\frac{k+1}{k}},$ where the exponent is proved optimal via constructive examples, and the result generalizes classical geometric inequalities for volume-to-boundary relationships.

In additive representation theory, oscillations in the representation function $R_{A,2}(n)$—counting solutions for $n = a + a'$ with $a, a' \in A$—cannot be bounded if $A$ has sufficiently many blocks (consecutive integer runs). This regularity breakdown, classically for first differences $|\Delta_1 R_{A,2}(n)|$ (Kiss et al., 2018), generalizes to higher differences: $$\Delta_l R_{A,2}(n) = \sum_{i=0}^l (-1)^{l-i} \binom{l}{i} R_{A,2}(n-i),$$ where block-richness in $A$ implies unbounded irregularity in higher differences of the representation function, elucidating a deep link between additive structure and analytic regularity phenomena.

2. Discrete, Combinatorial, and Topological Techniques

Compression (symmetrization) is fundamental in characterizing sets attaining minimal sumset size (Freiman et al., 2011): by repeatedly compressing sets along directions, sections become arithmetic progressions, and the global structure approaches rigidly regular forms such as “standard trapezoids.” For discrete images (Fabris et al., 2014), robust integer-only procedures avoid ambiguity associated with floating-point arithmetic by scanning for entry (i-pixels) and exit (o-pixels) transitions to fill interiors between boundary pixels. Preprocessing with algorithms such as CoTRA creates a minimal, locally thin, spike-free “Lego curve” to partition the canvas rigorously, ensuring consistency even with degenerate boundaries.

In cellular topology, filling inequalities are proved via inductive decompositions and slicing of the hypercube, careful tracking of cycle partitions, and dimension-free recursion. Such approaches generalize to high-dimensional, random complexes (Linial–Meshulam), graph bandwidth problems (Harper), and Dehn functions in geometric group theory.

3. Infilling in Computational Media: Text, Code, Motion, and Visual Narratives

Modern additive infilling extends to generative modeling tasks:

• Text Infilling: Arbitrary missing text portions are recovered by models leveraging bi-directional context (self-attention), segment-aware position encoding (tuples of segment and offset indices), and masked training data (Zhu et al., 2019). These models use cross-entropy over blanks and global attention to produce coherent, contextually appropriate insertions.
• Code Infilling: The generative code model InCoder (Fried et al., 2022) trains with causal masking, where random spans are masked and appended at the end, and bidirectional context is exploited through mask sentinel tokens. During inference, arbitrary gaps in code are infilled using both left and right context—a task unattainable for unidirectional, left-to-right models. This enables zero-shot completion, bug-fixing, and variable renaming, and improvements are marked in HumanEval pass rate and exact-match metrics.
• Motion Infilling: 3D human motion infilling is reformulated as image inpainting (Kaufmann et al., 2020) using convolutional autoencoders trained with variable-length mask corruption and curriculum learning. The approach handles not just missing frames but also partial pose gaps and noisy/degraded data, producing natural transitions and robust reconstructions for long, complex motion sequences.
• Visual Narrative Infilling: Models predict missing steps in procedures or stories conditioned on incomplete image sequences by masking local image features and leveraging global sequential encoding (Chandu et al., 2020). The ViPT dataset demonstrates that infilling-based training yields more coherent procedural narratives, with state-of-the-art METEOR scores.

4. Geometric Infilling and Additive Manufacturing

In additive manufacturing, continuous sparse toolpath planning requires “infilling” geometric layers with a single, non-crossing path (Gupta et al., 2019). An Euler transformation converts an arbitrary 2D cell complex $K$ into a new complex $\widehat{K}$ with vertices of even degree (typically 4), enabling an Eulerian tour covering each edge exactly once. Slicing and patching methods ensure boundary consistency upon layer extraction, while support edges are added to maintain Eulerian properties and physical support for each new layer. Toolpath algorithms organize cycles into circuit trees and enforce cross-over–free transitions through strict orientation and edge-traversal restrictions, producing uninterrupted extrusion paths even in multiply-connected or non-convex domains.

5. Infilling Algorithms in 3D Geometry, View Synthesis, and Heterogeneous Graphs

• Point Cloud Geometry: Adaptive, non-rigid exemplar-based inpainting, with dynamically-resizing templates and energy-minimizing displacements, fills large holes in 3D point clouds by transferring and morphing matched regions from elsewhere in the cloud (Dinesh et al., 2018).
• Temporal View Synthesis: Disoccluded region infilling is approached by predicting spatial displacement vectors—guided by a temporal prior and normalized depth—rather than direct intensity estimation. The network (U-Net) uses prior vectors warped forward and processed depth maps, fusing temporal and geometric cues for sharp, temporally-stable synthesis (Kanchana et al., 2021).
• Graph Meta-Path Infilling: MetaFill reframes meta-path extraction in heterogeneous information networks (HINs) as a text infilling problem, where pretrained LLMs (PLMs, e.g., GPT-2) predict missing node and edge-type names by filling template masks. Subsequent context-aware classifiers integrate type consistency, and applications to link prediction and node classification demonstrate superior metrics, including zero-shot inference on unseen edge types (Liu et al., 2022).

6. Applications and Practical Impact

Additive infilling is essential across domains:

• Ensuring sharp lower bounds in sumset problems for additive combinatorics.
• Designing topology-respecting internal structures in digital images and high-dimensional cubes.
• Automating region-filling in image processing, motion interpolation, 3D shape reconstruction, toolpath planning, code completion, and meta-path generation.
• Supporting robust performance in generative modeling by enforcing global-contextual coherence.
• Enabling real-world systems (e.g., VR synthesis, robotics, CAD/3D printing, digital archives) to reconstruct or interpolate missing data segments.
• Grounding algorithms in mathematically optimal bounds and structural characterizations (e.g., trapezoidal sets, compressed sections, minimal cycles).

7. Future Directions

Open problems and future perspectives include:

• Extending extremal characterizations to higher-dimensional or more generic algebraic structures (Freiman et al., 2011).
• Quantitative stability analysis of nearly minimal configurations in inverse additive problems and their implications for noisy or incomplete real-world data.
• Scaling exact integer-only infilling techniques to richer topologies in computer graphics and digital geometry (Fabris et al., 2014).
• Investigating model-based infilling where structural consistency and semantic constraints are learnable for code, text, and graph applications.
• Bridging combinatorial, topological, and algorithmic infilling paradigms to address hybrid and cross-domain problems (e.g., multi-modal narrative completion, reliable robotic control policies).

A plausible implication is that further progress will rely on synthesizing discrete mathematical optimization principles with neural network–based infilling mechanisms and leveraging explicit contextual and structural information for robust, explainable results.

---

This article provides a rigorous and multi-disciplinary perspective on the additive infilling problem, connecting its foundational mathematical roots to advanced algorithmic strategies and evaluating its impact across combinatorics, topology, geometry, computer vision, natural language processing, 3D manufacturing, and heterogeneous graph analysis.