Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

EuAgAs: Tunable Magnetic Topological Semimetal

Updated 4 July 2026
  • EuAgAs is a hexagonal rare-earth pnictide whose magnetic order crucially shapes its topological phases, including Dirac, Weyl, and triply-degenerate states.
  • It integrates a complex interplay of crystal symmetry, layered magnetic interactions, and varied experimental signatures from ARPES, transport, and ultrafast optics.
  • Multiple control pathways via magnetic field, pressure, and laser excitation make EuAgAs a promising platform for advanced spintronic and topological applications.

EuAgAs is a hexagonal rare-earth pnictide in space group P63/mmcP6_3/mmc (No. 194) whose defining feature is the strong dependence of its band topology on magnetic order. Across first-principles, neutron, transport, ARPES, resonant x-ray, and ultrafast optical studies, it has been described as a Dirac semimetal in the paramagnetic or symmetry-protected antiferromagnetic regime, and as a system that can host magnetic triply-degenerate points, mirror-topological semimetal phases, linear and double Weyl points, higher-order topology, and pressure-accessible altermagnetism (Jin et al., 2021, Gazzah et al., 15 May 2026, Laha et al., 2021, Mudgal et al., 22 May 2026, Liu et al., 2024, Soh et al., 19 May 2026). Its status as a model magnetic topological semimetal rests not on a single fixed phase, but on a closely competing manifold of magnetic states whose electronic structures are topologically distinct.

1. Crystal chemistry and symmetry framework

EuAgAs crystallizes in the hexagonal P63/mmcP6_3/mmc structure with two formula units per cell. The literature assigns related prototype labels including a modified Ni2_2In–type hexagonal structure, a Ni2_2In–type hexagonal structure, and a BeZrSi–type structure, while retaining the same space-group description (Jin et al., 2021, Liu et al., 2024, Gazzah et al., 15 May 2026). Reported lattice parameters include a=4.516a = 4.516 Å and c=8.107c = 8.107 Å from experiment, a=4.5052(2)a = 4.5052(2) Å and c=8.0929(5)c = 8.0929(5) Å at $250$ K, and room-temperature values of a4.27a \approx 4.27 Å, P63/mmcP6_3/mmc0 Å; other studies quote approximate values P63/mmcP6_3/mmc1 Å, P63/mmcP6_3/mmc2 Å or note that this family typically has lattice parameters on the order of P63/mmcP6_3/mmc3 Å and P63/mmcP6_3/mmc4 Å (Jin et al., 2021, Gazzah et al., 15 May 2026, Soh et al., 19 May 2026, Liu et al., 2024, Laha et al., 2021).

All cited studies place Eu on the P63/mmcP6_3/mmc5 Wyckoff site. For Ag and As, several works use Ag at P63/mmcP6_3/mmc6 and As at P63/mmcP6_3/mmc7, whereas one neutron-based refinement reports Ag at P63/mmcP6_3/mmc8 and As at P63/mmcP6_3/mmc9 (Jin et al., 2021, Laha et al., 2021, Liu et al., 2024, Soh et al., 19 May 2026, Gazzah et al., 15 May 2026). Symmetry generators explicitly invoked in topological analyses include 2_20, 2_21, inversion 2_22, screw 2_23, mirror 2_24, glide 2_25, and mirror 2_26 (Jin et al., 2021). The structure is nonsymmorphic, with 2_27 screw axes and glide planes, and these operations are central to the protection or reshaping of magnetic topological states, including altermagnetic symmetry and higher-order Weyl nodes (Gazzah et al., 15 May 2026, Soh et al., 19 May 2026).

Structurally, EuAgAs may be viewed as stacked Eu layers alternating with 2_28 honeycomb nets along 2_29 (Soh et al., 19 May 2026). This layered arrangement underlies the prominence of interlayer magnetic competition and the repeated appearance of propagation vectors with a substantial 2_20-axis component.

2. Magnetic order: established phases, competing models, and exchange hierarchy

Eu carries a local moment 2_21 in DFT-based treatments and an ordered moment 2_22 per Eu in neutron diffraction, consistent with Eu2_23 and 2_24 (Jin et al., 2021, Gazzah et al., 15 May 2026). Magnetic ordering is consistently reported near 2_25 K: 2_26 K, 2_27 K, 2_28 K, or a two-step sequence with 2_29 K and a=4.516a = 4.5160 K (Jin et al., 2021, Laha et al., 2021, Gazzah et al., 15 May 2026, Soh et al., 19 May 2026).

Early descriptions emphasized A-type antiferromagnetism: ferromagnetic alignment within each a=4.516a = 4.5161 plane and antiferromagnetic coupling between adjacent planes along a=4.516a = 4.5162, corresponding to a propagation vector a=4.516a = 4.5163 (Laha et al., 2021). A weak ferromagnetic canting was inferred from the small bifurcation of the ZFC–FC susceptibility below a=4.516a = 4.5164 K and a metamagnetic anomaly in a=4.516a = 4.5165 at a=4.516a = 4.5166 T (Laha et al., 2021). In that phenomenology, the minimal spin Hamiltonian was written as

a=4.516a = 4.5167

with a=4.516a = 4.5168, easy-plane anisotropy a=4.516a = 4.5169, and Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya vectors c=8.107c = 8.1070 allowed by the c=8.107c = 8.1071 symmetry (Laha et al., 2021).

Subsequent neutron diffraction refined the bulk ground state as a c=8.107c = 8.1072 AFM structure with in-plane moments along the crystallographic c=8.107c = 8.1073-axis and a ferromagnetic-layer stacking sequence c=8.107c = 8.1074 along c=8.107c = 8.1075, doubling the primitive cell (Gazzah et al., 15 May 2026). The same work extracted a critical exponent from c=8.107c = 8.1076 with c=8.107c = 8.1077, consistent with a c=8.107c = 8.1078D second-order transition (Gazzah et al., 15 May 2026).

A further neutron and resonant elastic x-ray study resolved an incommensurate transverse helical state. Below c=8.107c = 8.1079 it found

a=4.5052(2)a = 4.5052(2)0

with a=4.5052(2)a = 4.5052(2)1 decreasing from a=4.5052(2)a = 4.5052(2)2 at a=4.5052(2)a = 4.5052(2)3 K to a=4.5052(2)a = 4.5052(2)4 at a=4.5052(2)a = 4.5052(2)5 K, and below a=4.5052(2)a = 4.5052(2)6 an additional

a=4.5052(2)a = 4.5052(2)7

with a=4.5052(2)a = 4.5052(2)8 nearly temperature-independent down to a=4.5052(2)a = 4.5052(2)9 K (Soh et al., 19 May 2026). Spherical neutron polarimetry identified both as transverse helices with moments in the c=8.0929(5)c = 8.0929(5)0 plane rotating about the c=8.0929(5)c = 8.0929(5)1 axis. The turn angle per Eu–Eu layer was reported as

c=8.0929(5)c = 8.0929(5)2

implying a helix period of c=8.0929(5)c = 8.0929(5)3–c=8.0929(5)c = 8.0929(5)4 layers, or c=8.0929(5)c = 8.0929(5)5 (Soh et al., 19 May 2026).

The magnetic competition in EuAgAs is unusually strong. One first-principles study of collinear states considered PM, AFM-c=8.0929(5)c = 8.0929(5)6, AFM-c=8.0929(5)c = 8.0929(5)7, AFM-c=8.0929(5)c = 8.0929(5)8, and FM-c=8.0929(5)c = 8.0929(5)9 configurations, finding AFM-$250$0 as the lowest total energy, AFM-$250$1 only $250$2 meV/f.u. higher, AFM-$250$3 $250$4–$250$5 meV/f.u. higher, and FM-$250$6 $250$7–$250$8 meV/f.u. higher (Jin et al., 2021). A later DFT study centered on the experimentally refined $250$9 AFM ground state found an even tighter hierarchy: FM with moments parallel to the a4.27a \approx 4.270-axis at a4.27a \approx 4.271 meV/f.u., AM with a4.27a \approx 4.272 at a4.27a \approx 4.273 meV/f.u., and FM with moments parallel to the a4.27a \approx 4.274-axis at a4.27a \approx 4.275 meV/f.u. (Gazzah et al., 15 May 2026).

To reproduce the commensurate a4.27a \approx 4.276 stacking, that later work introduced the effective one-dimensional model

a4.27a \approx 4.277

with

a4.27a \approx 4.278

Pure bilinear exchange yields a4.27a \approx 4.279 and generally favors an incommensurate spin spiral, whereas the negative biquadratic term penalizes non-collinear alignments and stabilizes the commensurate P63/mmcP6_3/mmc00 state when sufficiently large (Gazzah et al., 15 May 2026).

A recurrent point of interpretation is therefore the magnetic ground state itself. Earlier topological analyses were formulated for A-type AFM and closely related collinear configurations, whereas later diffraction studies reported either a commensurate P63/mmcP6_3/mmc01 P63/mmcP6_3/mmc02 state or an incommensurate transverse helix with two nearby propagation vectors (Jin et al., 2021, Gazzah et al., 15 May 2026, Soh et al., 19 May 2026). This suggests an exceptionally shallow magnetic energy landscape.

3. Order-dependent bulk topology

The central theoretical result on EuAgAs is that distinct magnetic orders realize different quasiparticle spectra and bulk invariants (Jin et al., 2021). In the paramagnetic state, with time-reversal and inversion both present, EuAgAs is a Dirac semimetal with two accidental fourfold Dirac points P63/mmcP6_3/mmc03 and P63/mmcP6_3/mmc04 on P63/mmcP6_3/mmc05–P63/mmcP6_3/mmc06 at P63/mmcP6_3/mmc07, where

P63/mmcP6_3/mmc08

The little co-group is P63/mmcP6_3/mmc09, and the two crossing bands transform as the P63/mmcP6_3/mmc10D irreps P63/mmcP6_3/mmc11 and P63/mmcP6_3/mmc12 (Jin et al., 2021). The low-energy P63/mmcP6_3/mmc13 Hamiltonian around P63/mmcP6_3/mmc14 is

P63/mmcP6_3/mmc15

with P63/mmcP6_3/mmc16 eV·Å (Jin et al., 2021). The Dirac points are accidental in the sense that they disappear if the band ordering at P63/mmcP6_3/mmc17 is reversed, and the band inversion at P63/mmcP6_3/mmc18 yields P63/mmcP6_3/mmc19D P63/mmcP6_3/mmc20 in the P63/mmcP6_3/mmc21 plane (Jin et al., 2021).

Under magnetic ordering, the same parent band structure reorganizes into several distinct topological phases.

Magnetic state Symmetry/topology outcome Representative feature
PM Dirac semimetal Two accidental Dirac points on P63/mmcP6_3/mmc22–P63/mmcP6_3/mmc23
AFM-P63/mmcP6_3/mmc24 Magnetic triply-degenerate semimetal Each Dirac splits into two TDPs
AFM-P63/mmcP6_3/mmc25, AFM-P63/mmcP6_3/mmc26 Topological mirror semimetals Direct gap with band inversion at P63/mmcP6_3/mmc27
FM-P63/mmcP6_3/mmc28 Weyl semimetal Linear and double Weyl points on P63/mmcP6_3/mmc29–P63/mmcP6_3/mmc30
Helical phase Higher-order Weyl state P63/mmcP6_3/mmc31 Weyl nodes near P63/mmcP6_3/mmc32
AM phase Altermagnetic Dirac-semimetal regime Twofold spin-split crossings along P63/mmcP6_3/mmc33–P63/mmcP6_3/mmc34

In AFM-P63/mmcP6_3/mmc35, breaking P63/mmcP6_3/mmc36 but preserving P63/mmcP6_3/mmc37 along P63/mmcP6_3/mmc38–P63/mmcP6_3/mmc39 splits each Dirac point into two magnetic triply-degenerate points. The first, P63/mmcP6_3/mmc40, is the crossing of P63/mmcP6_3/mmc41 and P63/mmcP6_3/mmc42 at P63/mmcP6_3/mmc43; the second, P63/mmcP6_3/mmc44, is the crossing of P63/mmcP6_3/mmc45 and P63/mmcP6_3/mmc46 at P63/mmcP6_3/mmc47 (Jin et al., 2021).

In AFM-P63/mmcP6_3/mmc48 and AFM-P63/mmcP6_3/mmc49, the systems are fully gapped throughout the Brillouin zone in the direct-gap sense but retain band inversion at P63/mmcP6_3/mmc50; their topology is captured by mirror Chern numbers

P63/mmcP6_3/mmc51

with DFT yielding nonzero P63/mmcP6_3/mmc52, P63/mmcP6_3/mmc53, and P63/mmcP6_3/mmc54 for AFM-P63/mmcP6_3/mmc55, and nonzero P63/mmcP6_3/mmc56 for AFM-P63/mmcP6_3/mmc57 (Jin et al., 2021). These phases were described as adiabatically connected to topological crystalline insulators. All AFM states in that framework also carry a nontrivial parity-based P63/mmcP6_3/mmc58 index

P63/mmcP6_3/mmc59

indicating second-order topology and implying hinge modes (Jin et al., 2021).

In FM-P63/mmcP6_3/mmc60, exchange splitting breaks all degeneracies and produces multiple twofold Weyl points on P63/mmcP6_3/mmc61–P63/mmcP6_3/mmc62. Four nodes were explicitly identified:

P63/mmcP6_3/mmc63

P63/mmcP6_3/mmc64

P63/mmcP6_3/mmc65

P63/mmcP6_3/mmc66

The double Weyl point P63/mmcP6_3/mmc67 is stabilized by P63/mmcP6_3/mmc68 and disperses linearly along P63/mmcP6_3/mmc69 and quadratically in P63/mmcP6_3/mmc70 (Jin et al., 2021).

The more recent altermagnetic analysis extends this landscape. In the AM phase, bulk Dirac-semimetal crossings along P63/mmcP6_3/mmc71–P63/mmcP6_3/mmc72 at P63/mmcP6_3/mmc73 remain, but are twofold split by non-relativistic spin polarization with “g-wave” altermagnetism; splittings up to P63/mmcP6_3/mmc74 meV were reported in Eu-P63/mmcP6_3/mmc75 bands (Gazzah et al., 15 May 2026). Hydrostatic pressure drives the AFM and AM energies through a crossing at P63/mmcP6_3/mmc76 GPa, with the sign change of P63/mmcP6_3/mmc77 moving the system across the P63/mmcP6_3/mmc78 phase diagram from the AFM sector into the AM sector (Gazzah et al., 15 May 2026).

In the helical phase, the exchange field

P63/mmcP6_3/mmc79

folds the band structure in a supercell doubled along P63/mmcP6_3/mmc80, and the combination of broken P63/mmcP6_3/mmc81 and P63/mmcP6_3/mmc82 with preserved P63/mmcP6_3/mmc83 and P63/mmcP6_3/mmc84 produces protected higher-order Weyl nodes with Chern number P63/mmcP6_3/mmc85 along P63/mmcP6_3/mmc86–P63/mmcP6_3/mmc87 (Soh et al., 19 May 2026). DFT places these double-Weyl points at or very near the P63/mmcP6_3/mmc88 point in the unshifted helical band structure (Soh et al., 19 May 2026).

4. Electronic structure in experiment: transport, ARPES, and Fermi-level alignment

Magnetotransport established EuAgAs as an antiferromagnetic Dirac semimetal with additional real-space-topological response (Laha et al., 2021). In the AFM ground state, each band remains twofold degenerate by the combination of inversion P63/mmcP6_3/mmc89 and the effective time-reversal symmetry P63/mmcP6_3/mmc90, and a pair of fourfold-degenerate Dirac points occurs along the P63/mmcP6_3/mmc91 axis close to the Fermi energy (Laha et al., 2021). The low-energy Hamiltonian about one node was written as

P63/mmcP6_3/mmc92

The Hall resistivity was decomposed as

P63/mmcP6_3/mmc93

with P63/mmcP6_3/mmc94 and P63/mmcP6_3/mmc95 (Laha et al., 2021). The topological Hall component appears only below P63/mmcP6_3/mmc96 and in the field window P63/mmcP6_3/mmc97–P63/mmcP6_3/mmc98 T where the weak metamagnetic transition occurs. At P63/mmcP6_3/mmc99 K, the maximum amplitude reaches 2_200 and the corresponding Hall angle 2_201 reaches 2_202 (Laha et al., 2021). This signal was attributed to real-space Berry phases from a noncollinear spin texture with finite scalar spin chirality

2_203

(Laha et al., 2021).

Longitudinal magnetoresistance measurements for 2_204 found a negative LMR that reaches 2_205 at 2_206 K and persists up to 2_207 K in the paramagnetic regime (Laha et al., 2021). Fits using

2_208

with 2_209 and 2_210, yielded a positive 2_211 and a chirality-changing scattering time 2_212 s from the temperature dependence of 2_213 versus 2_214 (Laha et al., 2021). In the field-polarized regime, the breaking of 2_215 splits each Dirac point into two Weyl nodes with calculated separations 2_216 Å2_217 and 2_218 Å2_219; the intrinsic anomalous Hall conductivity was estimated as 2_220 (Laha et al., 2021).

ARPES and DFT later refined the orbital content and near-2_221 dispersion. Polarization-dependent ARPES at 2_222 eV found a small 2_223-centered Fermi-surface ring formed by nearly linear Dirac-like bands observed along 2_224–2_225 and 2_226–2_227, with the contour expanding systematically at binding energies 2_228, 2_229 meV, 2_230 meV, and 2_231 meV (Mudgal et al., 22 May 2026). The minimal in-plane Hamiltonian was written as

2_232

with 2_233 and 2_234 on the order of 2_235–2_236 m/s extracted from ARPES slopes (Mudgal et al., 22 May 2026). Orbital-projected DFT showed that these low-energy bands derive predominantly from As 2_237 and Ag 2_238 orbitals, with the Eu 2_239 manifold sitting 2_240 eV below 2_241 (Mudgal et al., 22 May 2026). In polarization-dependent measurements, 2_242 polarization enhanced even-parity orbitals and 2_243 polarization enhanced odd-parity orbitals, producing complementary intensity modulation on the Fermi-surface ring (Mudgal et al., 22 May 2026).

The same ARPES study reported a higher-order van Hove point at 2_244 eV in DFT, arising from opposite curvature along 2_245 and 2_246, with an enhanced bulk DOS at the same binding energy (Mudgal et al., 22 May 2026). Across the AFM transition, Fermi surfaces and dispersions at 2_247 K and 2_248 K were essentially identical within experimental resolution, and DFT comparisons between nonmagnetic and AFM phases likewise showed negligible splitting or reconstruction near 2_249 (Mudgal et al., 22 May 2026). This observation directly counters the simple expectation of a large low-energy exchange reconstruction.

A separate ARPES study performed in the helical-order context found that all measured bands lie 2_250 eV lower in energy than in DFT; aligning theory with experiment required a rigid upward shift of 2_251 eV to the calculated bands (Soh et al., 19 May 2026). In that alignment, the higher-order Weyl nodes predicted for the helical phase lie just above the ARPES chemical potential and were not directly observed (Soh et al., 19 May 2026).

5. Surface and boundary phenomena

Surface electronic structure calculations reflect the magnetic-order dependence of the bulk topology (Jin et al., 2021). In the paramagnetic Dirac-semimetal phase, the side surface normal to 2_252 exhibits surface-projected Dirac points connected by two Fermi arcs, one for each Dirac-point pair (Jin et al., 2021). This is a characteristic surface manifestation of the bulk accidental Dirac nodes on 2_253–2_254.

For AFM-2_255, surface features are obscured by bulk bands, although the nontrivial 2_256 index implies higher-order topology and expected hinge modes (Jin et al., 2021). In the mirror-topological semimetal regimes, the side surface normal to 2_257 hosts a Dirac-type surface cone at 2_258 in AFM-2_259, protected by 2_260 and 2_261, while AFM-2_262 supports a single Dirac cone shifted away from 2_263, protected by 2_264 only (Jin et al., 2021). These states represent the surface counterpart of the nonzero mirror Chern numbers.

In FM-2_265, the side surface normal to 2_266 displays the expected Weyl connectivity: each projected double Weyl point 2_267 emits two Fermi arcs, whereas the linear Weyl points emit single arcs (Jin et al., 2021). In this sense, EuAgAs offers within a single material a direct comparison among Dirac-point projections, crystalline-topological surface cones, and Weyl-arc networks.

Surface calculations in the 2_268 geometry for the AFM phase also showed gapped Dirac crossings and topological surface resonances, and this was used to argue that access to the AM phase could realize symmetry-protected spin-split topological states (Gazzah et al., 15 May 2026). By contrast, in the helical phase the experimentally measured Fermi surface changed only minimally because the folded bands near 2_269 carried negligible spectral weight (Soh et al., 19 May 2026). The boundary phenomenology is therefore highly state selective: some phases yield clear arc or cone signatures, while others mainly advertise their topology through hinge or resonance features.

6. Tunability, nonequilibrium control, and broader significance

The most distinctive materials-level attribute of EuAgAs is the multiplicity of control parameters that can move it among proximate magnetic and topological sectors. Magnetic-order control was proposed to switch reversibly among a Dirac semimetal, a triply-degenerate semimetal, a mirror TCI-like semimetal, and a Weyl semimetal, with concomitant changes from surface Fermi arcs to surface Dirac cones (Jin et al., 2021). The FM phase can be accessed in calculation or by applied field; one later study explicitly described the forced FM phase as reachable for example by 2_270 T, where each Dirac point splits into a pair of Weyl points protected by the 2_271 screw symmetry (Gazzah et al., 15 May 2026).

Hydrostatic pressure provides a second route. DFT predicts an AFM-to-AM transition at 2_272 GPa, driven by the change in sign of 2_273 and accompanied by momentum-dependent non-relativistic spin splitting characteristic of the AM phase (Gazzah et al., 15 May 2026). This places EuAgAs among the few systems proposed as controllable platforms for topological altermagnetism rather than merely static altermagnetic candidates.

Ultrafast optical excitation provides a third route. Time-resolved differential reflectivity at 2_274 nm using 2_275 fs pulses found at low fluence a fast rise followed by a 2_276 ps decay, described by

2_277

with 2_278 fs and an instrument-response width 2_279 fs (Liu et al., 2024). Above 2_280, the relaxation followed a two-temperature model with 2_281 W m2_282 K2_283 (Liu et al., 2024). At 2_284 K, the fluence dependence showed a sign reversal of 2_285 at a critical fluence 2_286J/cm2_287, with 2_288 increasing by 2_289 through 2_290; this was interpreted as a laser-driven AFM2_291FM switch that transiently transforms an AFM Dirac semimetal into an FM Weyl semimetal on a subpicosecond timescale (Liu et al., 2024). Above 2_292, at 2_293 K, the same sign reversal was absent (Liu et al., 2024).

These control pathways are the basis of the proposed applications. The literature associates EuAgAs with spin-polarized surface transport, magneto-optical devices, high-sensitivity magnetic sensors, low-dissipation interconnects, 1D dissipationless channels based on higher-order hinge modes, spin-orbit-torque devices, topological magnetic memory elements, chiral-anomaly-based sensors, and THz-speed magnetic memory (Jin et al., 2021, Laha et al., 2021, Liu et al., 2024). A cautious reading is nevertheless warranted. The ground-state magnetic structure is not presented identically across all studies, and some topological features remain prediction-led or lie above the experimentally accessed Fermi level (Gazzah et al., 15 May 2026, Soh et al., 19 May 2026). Even so, the accumulated evidence converges on a narrower conclusion: EuAgAs is a strongly tunable magnetic topological semimetal in which subtle changes of magnetic order, field, pressure, or optical excitation reorganize both the quasiparticle content and the accessible boundary responses.

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to EuAgAs.