Diffusion-Based Unified Modeling

• Diffusion-based unified modeling is a framework that uses diffusion generative models to simultaneously handle multiple tasks and modalities within a coherent formulation.
• It employs stochastic differential equations and unified variational objectives to parameterize both forward (noising) and reverse (denoising) processes with theoretical rigor.
• The approach enables scalable multi-modal generation and joint inference across domains such as image-text synthesis, robotics, and scientific inverse problems.

Diffusion-Based Unified Modeling refers to a class of frameworks, algorithms, and theoretical approaches that use diffusion generative models to simultaneously handle multiple tasks, modalities, objectives, or distributional regimes within a single, coherent mathematical or architectural formulation. Diffusion-based unified modeling has become a central paradigm for domains ranging from multi-modal generation and scientific inverse problems to robotics, structured prediction, and foundational model pretraining. These approaches are characterized by their ability to parameterize and control the forward (noising) and reverse (denoising or generative) processes such that different tasks, modalities, or data types are either jointly or independently handled, sharing learnable components, noise schedules, or conditional mechanisms. Rigorous theoretical underpinnings, generalized score-matching criteria, and unified variational objectives are typically used to guarantee expressiveness and optimization tractability.

1. Foundational Principles and Mathematical Frameworks

The underpinnings of diffusion-based unified modeling reside in the formulation of stochastic differential equations (SDEs) or discretized Markov chains that define how data is progressively corrupted ("noised") and subsequently recovered ("denoised") to sample from complex distributions. In unified modeling, key innovations focus on expanding the parameterizations of the forward SDEs, the design of the latent or function spaces, and the construction of generalized losses to accommodate distinct but related tasks.

A general model may be written as:

$d X_t = f(X_t)\,dt + \sqrt{2 R(X_t)}\,dW_t$

where $f(\cdot)$ is a drift term and $R(X_t)$ is a, possibly space-dependent, (typically positive-definite or semidefinite) metric or covariance operator (e.g., a Riemannian metric or an operator that may encode anisotropy or geometry), as illustrated in (Du et al., 2022). Certain formulations further decompose $R(x)$ into symmetric (Riemannian) and anti-symmetric (symplectic/Hamiltonian) components to ensure ergodicity, controllable stationary distributions, or desired domain adaptation properties.

From the variational perspective, the unified approach is often cast via Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO) decompositions that exploit deterministic and stochastic correspondences (see (Luo, 2022, Chen et al., 24 Jul 2024)), while probabilistic PDE derivations (see (Dasgupta et al., 10 Apr 2025)) enable common derivations in terms of evolution of densities under drift–diffusion or Fokker–Planck equations:

$$\partial_t p_t(x) = \frac{\gamma(t)}{2} \Delta p_t(x)$$

where $\Delta$ denotes the Laplacian, and $\gamma(t)$ prescribes noise intensity. This connects the variance-exploding and variance-preserving families, and by coordinate or kernel transformations, new classes of models are constructed with controlled dynamical properties.

In multi-modal or multi-task unified models, aggregation functions in the forward diffusion (e.g., (Chen et al., 24 Jul 2024)) or decoupled time variables and generators for each modality (Rojas et al., 9 Jun 2025) are mathematically formalized to ensure tractable, tractable computation for both unconditional and conditional generation:

$$X = (X^1, \dots, X^n),\qquad X^i_t \text{ follows a Markov process with generator } \mathcal{L}_{X^i}$$

2. Parameterized Unified Generative Structures

Unified modeling extends standard diffusion to encapsulate spatial, temporal, or modal heterogeneity within learnable parameterizations.

• Spatial Parameterization: The introduction of learnable, possibly space- and data-dependent Riemannian and symplectic (Hamiltonian) objects into the forward SDE (e.g., FP-Diffusion, (Du et al., 2022)) provides control over the noising path, enabling adaptation to the intrinsic structure or manifold support of the data. These parameterizations guarantee convergence to Gaussian stationarity under explicit conditions and allow the reverse process to be precisely characterized.
• Multi-Modal and Multi-Task: Architectures such as UniDiffuser (Bao et al., 2023), MT-Diffusion (Chen et al., 24 Jul 2024), and Diffuse Everything (Rojas et al., 9 Jun 2025) use modality-specific encoders, decoders, or decoupled noise schedules to jointly handle images, text, labels, or other modalities. Independent or joint diffusion timesteps for each modality (decoupled noise schedule) enable:
  • Unconditional, conditional, and joint generation in a single model,
  • Unconditional marginal and conditional guidance via dynamic control of the noising/denoising schedule,
  • Cross-modal translation tasks (text→image, image→text, etc.).
• Unified Transformers and Backbones: Modern approaches employ transformer-based joint backbones (e.g., U-ViT or specialized joint noise predictors) into which all modalities and time indices are embedded as tokens, ensuring parameter sharing without sacrificing conditional or task-specific decoding flexibility (Bao et al., 2023, Chen et al., 24 Jul 2024).

3. Unified Score-Matching Objectives and Guidance Mechanisms

Unified modeling relies on score-matching losses generalized for heterogeneous data and flexible guidance mechanisms:

• Generalized Score Matching (GSM, GESM): Losses are extended to sums or integrals over modalities and/or their respective time grids:

$$J_{GESM} = \mathbb{E}_{t, x_t}\left[\sum_{i=1}^n \left( \mathcal{L}_{X_i} \left(\frac{p}{\beta_\theta}\right)(x_t) / \left(\frac{p}{\beta_\theta}\right)(x_t) - \mathcal{L}_{X_i}\log\left(\frac{p}{\beta_\theta}\right)(x_t) \right) \right]$$

where $p$ is the data distribution, $\beta_\theta$ is a parameterized approximation, and $\mathcal{L}_{X_i}$ is the generator for modality $i$ (Rojas et al., 9 Jun 2025).

• Multi-Task Variational Lower Bounds: Elaboration of ELBOs with KL terms per modality, regularizations for distribution alignment, and per-task decoders enable optimization over diverse objective regimes (Chen et al., 24 Jul 2024).
• Guidance Mechanisms: Classifier guidance, classifier-free guidance, and "noisy guidance" interpolate between conditional and unconditional denoising directions by combining model-predicted scores at different noising levels or modalities, allowing dynamic trade-offs between sample diversity and conditional adherence (Luo, 2022, Rojas et al., 9 Jun 2025).

4. Empirical Results and Application Domains

Unified diffusion models have demonstrated strong empirical performance and flexibility across a range of domains:

Domain	Unified Model/Approach	Key Outcomes
Multi-modal Gen.	UniDiffuser (Bao et al., 2023), Diffuse Everything (Rojas et al., 9 Jun 2025), MT-Diffusion (Chen et al., 24 Jul 2024)	SOTA or competitive FID/CLIP, image–text and text–image joint generation, flexible conditionality
Molecular Generation	MUDiff (Hua et al., 2023)	Integrated 2D/3D molecule gen., increased stability and property fidelity
Time Series Forecast	UTSD (Ma et al., 4 Dec 2024)	Cross-domain generalization, superior zero-shot performance, robust probabilistic forecasting
Inverse Problems	PDE-based frameworks (Dasgupta et al., 10 Apr 2025)	Unified variance-preserving sampling for Bayesian inversion, conditioning on arbitrary measurement operators
Video/Robotics	EDELINE (Lee et al., 1 Feb 2025), UWM (Zhu et al., 3 Apr 2025), EventDiff (Zheng et al., 13 May 2025)	Unified dynamics/policy/video modeling, improved memory and sample quality, robust to data absence

Several models (e.g., EventDiff (Zheng et al., 13 May 2025)) have achieved significant performance gains in PSNR (e.g., +1.98 to +5.72dB) and inference speed, while multi-domain time series models (UTSD) demonstrate error reductions of 14–28% over earlier foundation models, and world models such as EDELINE outperform baselines across memory and visual fidelity metrics.

5. Theoretical Guarantees and Unified Sampling

Unified modeling frameworks provide explicit theoretical guarantees:

• Stationarity and Completeness: Under structural constraints (e.g., symmetry, anti-symmetry of operators), stationary distributions (typically standard Gaussian) are ensured (Du et al., 2022), and any linear process converging to a Gaussian can be decomposed accordingly.
• PDE-Based Unification: Drift–diffusion PDEs unify multiple diffusion model formulations and enable constructive forward/reverse processes, accommodating variance-exploding and variance-preserving regimes (Dasgupta et al., 10 Apr 2025).
• Reverse/Conditional Sampling: Inverse problems and conditional generation are addressed using conditional score estimation, leading to efficient posterior sampling without explicit likelihood approximation (Park et al., 27 Nov 2024, Dasgupta et al., 10 Apr 2025).

Sampling strategies (Euler–Maruyama, ODEs for probability flow, etc.) are adapted across different domains and tasks, and models such as GUD (Gerdes et al., 3 Oct 2024) introduce soft-conditioning to interpolate between diffusion and autoregressive behaviors within the same framework.

6. Scalability, Generalization, and Future Directions

Key implications and ongoing research trajectories include:

• Scaling and Data Efficiency: Parameter sharing, modality-specific encoders/decoders, and latent or native space modeling enhance sample efficiency and robustness, especially when data are limited and reconstruction artifacts must be suppressed (Rojas et al., 9 Jun 2025, Hua et al., 2023).
• Unified Architectures: Transformer-based architectures, staged training (e.g., UniSegDiff (Hu et al., 24 Jul 2025)), and adapter modules support extensible, cross-domain generalization (UTSD (Ma et al., 4 Dec 2024)).
• Modality Extension and Flexible Inference: The decoupled-noise approach allows straightforward future extension to additional data types (video, sequence, Riemannian modalities; (Rojas et al., 9 Jun 2025)), while inference flexibility is enhanced by decoupling training and sampling schedules (Park et al., 27 Nov 2024).
• Theory-Practice Bridge: Standardized notations, algorithmic templates, and code-aligned formulations ease implementation and reproducibility for new unified modeling algorithms (Ding et al., 22 Dec 2024).
• Application Breadth: Unified diffusion models now underpin domains as diverse as generative perception systems for robotics, medical segmentation (UniSegDiff), world modeling in RL, joint text–image synthesis, scientific inverse problems, and event-based vision, with documented improvements in both accuracy and practical system simplification.

7. Limitations and Open Questions

Several challenges and open research problems remain:

• How to optimally choose or learn spatial and temporal parameterizations for new or rapidly varying data manifolds;
• The impact of modality-specific or task-specific schedule design on convergence and sample quality in joint diffusion;
• Theoretical understanding of negative transfer in multi-modal settings and strategies for mitigation (see (Chen et al., 24 Jul 2024));
• Efficient scalable inference and online adaptation in resource-constrained environments;
• Further generalization of joint architectures to naturally embrace new modalities (audio, language, etc.) without retraining core components.

A plausible implication is that future unified models will further loosen architectural constraints, enable end-to-end specialization for arbitrary multimodal distributions, and blur boundaries between discriminative, generative, and control tasks under a common probabilistic framework.

---

Diffusion-based unified modeling thus provides a theoretically coherent, practically extensible, and empirically validated foundation for simultaneous, multi-task and multi-modal generative modeling across highly diverse application domains. Its formulation in terms of generalized SDEs, variational objectives, and flexible architectures underpins new advances in efficient learning, robust inference, and scalable deployment of generative and structured prediction systems.