Data Flow Systems: Architectures & Applications

• Data Flow Systems (DFS) are computational frameworks defined by directed graphs where operators process tokens based on data availability, ensuring parallel and flexible processing.
• DFS implementations in reconfigurable hardware use FPGA partial reconfiguration and finite-state machine agents to achieve low latency and high throughput for dynamic applications.
• Advanced DFS techniques employ pixel-based and parametric processing models to enable real-time scientific pipelines, such as astronomical alert systems, with robust fault tolerance.

A Data Flow System (DFS) is a computational framework in which the propagation and transformation of data tokens are governed by a directed graph of operators (actors) and edges, with processing driven by data availability rather than a centralized clock or control sequence. Modern DFS implementations span both hardware and software domains, offering advantages in parallelism, flexibility, and extensibility. Across domains, DFSs enable highly adaptable computation, efficient real-time processing, and integration with complex external data sources or hardware agents.

1. Reconfigurable Hardware-Based Data Flow Systems

In reconfigurable hardware, a DFS is realized as an architecture wherein each data-flow operator, or tightly coupled group of operators, is mapped onto a self-contained "hardware agent" embedded within a segment of a field-programmable gate array (FPGA). The global structure—i.e., the ensemble of agents and their interconnections—can be dynamically modified at runtime using partial reconfiguration mechanisms. In this paradigm, each agent functions as a finite-state machine, typically implementing a reduced Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) model, responsible for local control and data management (Naji, 2010).

Major Architectural Components

Component	Function	Notes
Embedded Processor/Configurator	Loads/reconfigures agent bitstreams	Program/control memory; DMA support
Configuration Memories	Store configuration bits per FPGA segment	Enable true partial reconfiguration
Reconfigurable Logic Fabric	Physical substrate for agents and routing	Partitioned into segments
I/O Interface & Environment	External communication (sensors, actuators, handshake)	Manages tokens and synchronization lines

The embedded processor may load new agents or interconnects on-the-fly, enabling segments of the system to remain active while others are being reconfigured.

2. Formal Data Flow and Partial Reconfiguration Models

A DFS is formally described as a directed graph $G = (A, E)$, where actors $a \in A$ process tokens received via input edges $I(a)$ and emit results along output edges $O(a)$. An actor is enabled if every input edge has at least one token. Upon firing, one token per input edge is consumed, the actor’s function $f_a: V^{|I(a)|} \rightarrow V^{|O(a)|}$ is computed, and one token per output edge is produced. Symbolically:

• $$enabled(a) = \bigwedge_{e \in I(a)}(\textrm{token}(e))$$
• $$fire(a): \{v_e\}_{e \in I(a)} \mapsto \{v'_e\}_{e \in O(a)}$$
• $\forall e \in I(a):\ \textrm{remove\_token}(e)$; $\forall e \in O(a):\ \textrm{add\_token}(e, v'_e)$

For partially reconfigurable FPGAs, let the chip comprise $M$ segments. Segment $i$ requires $B_i$ configuration bits, and the transfer rate is $R_{cfg}$. The reconfiguration time for a subset $S \subseteq \{1,...,M\}$ is:

$$T_{reconf}(S) = \sum_{i \in S} \frac{B_i}{R_{cfg}} + T_{sync}$$

The number of concurrent agents is maximized by the ratio of total FPGA area to the per-agent area.

3. Data Flow Processing Models and Agent Paradigms

DFSs in hardware support several agent-centric processing models:

• Deterministic Fine-Grain Agents: Each agent maps to a single arithmetic or data operation (e.g., addition, multiplication), maximizing parallelism but incurring high inter-agent handshake cost. Well-suited to small, homogeneous data-flow graphs.
• Mixed Fine/Coarse-Grain Agents: By clustering primitives into larger agents, interconnect overhead is reduced while maintaining parallelism. This trade-off improves resource efficiency for more complex graphs.
• Control/Data-Flow Agents: Combine conditional control (e.g., event or threshold gating) with downstream operations, providing adaptive logic in real-time pipelines.
• Non-Deterministic (Intelligent) Agents: Implement BDI loops in hardware using FSMs, allowing dynamic agent selection, basic learning, and fault-tolerance.

Agents communicate via handshake and data lines, typically following protocols such as Request, Acknowledge, and Strobe/Done.

4. Data Flow Systems for High-Throughput Scientific Pipelines

In astronomical data processing contexts, the DFS paradigm underpins modular, queue-based realtime pipelines capable of ingesting, reducing, and analyzing up to $N_{obs} \sim 10^6$ spectra per night (Ivanov, 26 Dec 2025). Essential components include:

• Ingestion Layer: Watches for new data, extracts metadata, and dispatches to reduction pipelines.
• Reference Database: Maintains an evolving archive of "native" and externally harvested reference spectra, indexed by target, instrument configuration, and epoch.
• Real-time Alert Pipeline: Preprocesses spectra, retrieves references, and applies both direct pixel-based and parametric line-fitting comparison engines.
• Archive Integration: Ensures spectra feed both the long-term archive and the alert system with no redundant I/O.

Example Processing Pseudocode

on_new_exposure(raw_fits): reduced = reduce_spectrum(raw_fits) if reduced.quality_flag > Qmin: ref_db.insert(reduced.metadata, reduced.spectrum) process_for_alerts(reduced) process_for_alerts(spectrum_new): spec_norm = continuum_normalize(spectrum_new) spec_vcorr = radial_velocity_correct(spec_norm) refs = ref_db.query(target_id=spectrum_new.target_id, coords=spectrum_new.coords) if refs.empty() and use_random_case: return for spec_ref in refs: spec_ref_norm = continuum_normalize(spec_ref) spec_ref_vcorr = radial_velocity_correct(spec_ref_norm) if use_parametric: fit_new = fit_lines_and_continuum(spec_vcorr) fit_ref = fit_lines_and_continuum(spec_ref_vcorr) stats = compare_fit_parameters(fit_new, fit_ref) else: diff = pixel_difference(spec_vcorr, spec_ref_vcorr) stats = compute_pixel_stats(diff) if stats.significance > σ_threshold: score = rank_alert(stats) alert = make_alert_record(spectrum_new.metadata, stats, score) broker.submit(alert)

The DFS must satisfy throughput and latency constraints such that $T_{total} = N_{obs} \times t_{proc} \leq T_{night}$, where $t_{proc}$ is per-spectrum processing time.

5. Algorithmic and Statistical Methodologies

DFS-based pipelines implement two principal strategies for scientific change detection:

• Pixel-Based Differencing: Align new/reference spectra, scale for continuum differences, and compute per-pixel residuals. Alerts are triggered if the $\chi^2$ test exceeds a defined threshold.
• Parametric Comparison: Fit both spectra with physical models (e.g., multicomponent Gaussian profiles), compare fit parameters ($P$), and evaluate parameter-space significance metrics such as $$S_A = |\Delta A| / \sqrt{\sigma^2_{A, new} + \sigma^2_{A, ref}}$$. Aggregate significance is used to rank alerts.

This methodology enables robust suppression of instrumental systematics and conversion of raw data variation into physically interpretable event rankings.

6. Performance, Scalability, and Operational Properties

Reconfigurable hardware DFSs have demonstrated per-token latencies as low as 25 ns (8-bit case), corresponding to speed-ups of up to $80\times$ versus software-agent chains running on conventional CPUs (Naji, 2010). FPGA resource utilization for small agents can be below 5%, permitting the concurrent operation of many agents.

For scientific alert pipelines, sustained real-time event discovery is enabled by stateless, message queue–based distributed designs. Fault tolerance is achieved via automatic message requeuing and health monitoring of services. Archive backends are updated in real time for native spectra and on scheduled cadences for external references. DFSs are configured to support variable user access controls and are compatible with Virtual Observatory protocols (e.g., VOEvent, TAP), facilitating standardized alert dissemination and external integration (Ivanov, 26 Dec 2025).

7. Applications, Domains, and Limitations

DFS implementations are effective in domains demanding real-time, adaptive, and high-throughput processing:

• Reconfigurable Hardware: Real-time sensor fusion, signal conditioning, high-throughput data streams (video, radar, communications), embedded adaptive control, and fault-tolerant hardware.
• Scientific Pipelines: Real-time spectroscopic variability alerting in astronomical surveys (e.g., WST), with applications in studying emission line star variability, active galactic nucleus state changes, and discovery of new temporal phenomena.

Limitations include configuration overhead, management complexity for partial bitstreams, handshake-to-logic trade-offs in agent granularity, and overall system complexity. Advances in FPGA technology, particularly in configuration bandwidth and granularity, are expected to further enhance DFS efficacy.

---

For foundational DFS architecture and agent models, see (Naji, 2010). For DFS requirements and implementations in scientific alert and data pipelines, see (Ivanov, 26 Dec 2025).