Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Cyclic Mumford Curves

Updated 6 January 2026
  • Cyclic Mumford curves are smooth projective algebraic curves defined over non-Archimedean fields that admit cyclic Galois covers and Schottky uniformization.
  • They are characterized by explicit quadratic inequalities on branch data, ensuring totally degenerate reductions and a rigid analytic structure.
  • Their moduli and invariants, expressed via p-adic theta functions, enable concrete classification and construction of examples across various genera.

A cyclic Mumford curve is a smooth projective algebraic curve defined over a non-Archimedean field, equipped with a Galois cover of the projective line by a cyclic group, and admitting a rigid-analytic uniformization by a Schottky group. These curves play a central role in pp-adic and rigid analytic geometry, connecting the reduction theory of algebraic curves with explicit analytic and theta function constructions. Cyclic Mumford curves of degree pp are characterized both by combinatorial degeneration criteria in their Artin–Schreier or Kummer coverings and by explicit expressions for their moduli and branch-point invariants through pp-adic theta functions.

1. Mumford Curves, Schottky Uniformization, and Cyclic Covers

Let KK be a complete, discretely valued (often algebraically closed) non-Archimedean field, with either characteristic p>0p > 0 or characteristic $0$ (e.g., K=CpK = \mathbb{C}_p). A smooth, projective, geometrically connected KK-curve XX of genus g2g \geq 2 is a Mumford curve if and only if it admits a Schottky uniformization: Xan(PK1L)/ΓX^{\rm an} \cong (\mathbb{P}^1_K \setminus \mathcal{L})/\Gamma where Γ<PGL2(K)\Gamma < \mathrm{PGL}_2(K) is a free, finitely generated, discrete, torsion-free subgroup, and LP1(K)\mathcal{L} \subset \mathbb{P}^1(K) is the limit set of Γ\Gamma. Equivalently, XX has totally degenerate split reduction: its stable model over KK^\circ has special fiber a union of P1\mathbb{P}^1's meeting at kk-rational ordinary double points (Mumford–Gerritzen–van der Put criterion).

A cyclic Mumford cover of degree pp is a finite Galois morphism: φ:XPK1\varphi: X \to \mathbb{P}^1_K of degree pp such that XX is a Mumford curve, and φ\varphi is either an Artin–Schreier cover in positive characteristic (p=charKp = \operatorname{char} K), or a Kummer cover in characteristic zero, ramified at finitely many points.

In the cyclic context, the group of deck transformations is generated by an order-pp automorphism σ0\sigma_0 operating on the ordinary region Ω\Omega, so that Γ0=Γ,σ0PGL2(K)\Gamma_0 = \langle \Gamma, \sigma_0 \rangle \subset \mathrm{PGL}_2(K) acts discontinuously, Γ\Gamma is free of rank gg, and X=Ω/ΓX = \Omega/\Gamma while Ω/Γ0P1(K)\Omega/\Gamma_0 \cong \mathbb{P}^1(K). The resulting Galois cover realizes the classical quotient structure with cyclic monodromy (Mikami, 2016, Kopeliovich, 30 Dec 2025).

2. Explicit Equations and Degeneration Criterion

For characteristic p>0p > 0, after finite extension of scalars, a degree-pp cyclic cover φ:XP1\varphi: X \to \mathbb{P}^1 can always be given birationally as an Artin–Schreier cover: ypy=i=1rλixai,λiK×, aiK, aiajy^p - y = \sum_{i=1}^r \frac{\lambda_i}{x - a_i}, \qquad \lambda_i \in K^\times, \ a_i \in K, \ a_i \ne a_j The genus of XX is (p1)(r1)(p-1)(r-1), so r3r \geq 3 or r=2r=2 with p3p \geq 3 ensures g2g \geq 2. The defining feature for XX to be a Mumford curve is a separation condition on the branch data: λiλj<aiaj2for all ij|\lambda_i \lambda_j| < |a_i - a_j|^2 \qquad \text{for all } i \ne j This criterion ensures that the reductions of the local affinoid covers around the branch points remain (non-intersecting) unions of rational curves, so the special fiber is totally degenerate and XX is Schottky uniformizable (Mikami, 2016).

In characteristic zero (and tame degree nn not dividing the residue characteristic), cyclic coverings are given by Kummer equations: yn=ci=1rxaixbiy^n = c \prod_{i=1}^r \frac{x-a_i}{x-b_i} with a similar "smallness" hypothesis for c|c| to ensure split degenerate reduction (Mikami, 2016).

3. Rigid-Analytic and Combinatorial Proof Structure

The proof of the explicit criterion proceeds in two main analytic directions:

  1. Sufficiency: If λiλj<aiaj2|\lambda_i \lambda_j| < |a_i-a_j|^2, then one constructs admissible affinoid coverings {Un}\{U_n\} adapted to the branch points. Over each UnU_n the cover reduces (after manipulations) to a local Artin–Schreier extension whose reduction is split. The local pieces glue to yield a totally degenerate special fiber, confirming that XX is a Mumford curve.
  2. Necessity: If XX is a Mumford curve (admits Schottky uniformization), the pp-adic tree of the Schottky group and the explicit expansion of local coordinates via group action yield the estimate λ1λ2<a1a22|\lambda_1 \lambda_2| < |a_1 - a_2|^2. This argument generalizes via combinatorial analysis of mirrors of parabolic elements in the Bruhat–Tits tree, guaranteeing the separation for all pairs of branch points (Mikami, 2016).

This yields a valuation-adic classification: the only obstruction to being a degree-pp cyclic Mumford cover is the explicit system of quadratic inequalities among the λi\lambda_i and aia_i.

4. pp-adic Schottky Theta Functions and λ\lambda-Invariants

For KK algebraically closed of characteristic zero, the uniformization framework gives rise to a pp-adic period torus and associated theta functions. Writing ΓFg\Gamma \cong F_g, let GΓ=Hom(Γ,K×)(K×)gG_\Gamma = \operatorname{Hom}(\Gamma, K^\times) \cong (K^\times)^g be the character torus, and AΓGΓA_\Gamma \subset G_\Gamma the period lattice of multipliers.

The Schottky theta quotient for a,bΩa, b \in \Omega is: Θa,b(z)=γΓzγazγb\Theta_{a,b}(z) = \prod_{\gamma \in \Gamma} \frac{z - \gamma a}{z - \gamma b} with automorphy Θa,b(γz)=ca,b(γ)Θa,b(z)\Theta_{a,b}(\gamma z) = c_{a,b}(\gamma)\Theta_{a,b}(z) for ca,b(γ)K×c_{a,b}(\gamma) \in K^\times. The analytic Jacobian is JΓ=GΓ/AΓJ_\Gamma = G_\Gamma/A_\Gamma, with a pp-adic period matrix Ω=(logqij)\Omega = (\log q_{ij}) from the multipliers.

A pp-adic λ\lambda-function expressing the cross-ratio of branch points is constructed as a quotient of pp-th powers of theta with characteristic: Λ(P)=θ[D1]Γ(uo(P))pθ[D2]Γ(uo(P))p\Lambda(P) = \frac{\theta[D_1]_\Gamma(u_o(P))^p}{\theta[D_2]_\Gamma(u_o(P))^p} where D1,D2D_1, D_2 are non-special divisors of degree gg selecting ramification points, and uou_o is the Abel–Jacobi multiplicative map. The quotient of Λ\Lambda at two points realizes the classical cross-ratio: Λ(P1)Λ(P2)=θ[D1]Γ(uo(P1))pθ[D2]Γ(uo(P2))pθ[D2]Γ(uo(P1))pθ[D1]Γ(uo(P2))p\frac{\Lambda(P_1)}{\Lambda(P_2)} = \frac{\theta[D_1]_\Gamma(u_o(P_1))^p\,\theta[D_2]_\Gamma(u_o(P_2))^p}{\theta[D_2]_\Gamma(u_o(P_1))^p\,\theta[D_1]_\Gamma(u_o(P_2))^p} which equates, for ramification points Bk,BB_k,B_\ell, to the rational formula

(aka)(bkb)(akb)(bka)\frac{(a_k - a_\ell)(b_k - b_\ell)}{(a_k - b_\ell)(b_k - a_\ell)}

(Kopeliovich, 30 Dec 2025).

5. Moduli, Classification, and Explicit Examples

The quadratic inequalities λiλj<aiaj2|\lambda_i\lambda_j|<|a_i - a_j|^2 cut out the moduli space of degree-pp cyclic Mumford covers inside the Artin–Schreier family. This results in an explicit, valuation-theoretic parameterization of these covers.

In the hyperelliptic case (p=2p=2), these constructions recover the classical Tate curve theory and the expressions for the cross-ratio ("λ\lambda") as quotients of even Riemann theta constants, paralleling the Thomae formula. For genus g=2g=2 and arbitrary pp, explicit power-series (theta expansion) expressions of the moduli invariant λ\lambda in the entries of the pp-adic period matrix Ω\Omega are available, generalizing Teitelbaum's formulas (Kopeliovich, 30 Dec 2025).

Concrete examples are generated by choosing branch points aia_i with valuations forming an arithmetic progression and residues λi\lambda_i of prescribed valuation just below aiaj|a_i - a_j|, yielding one-parameter families of cyclic Mumford curves of arbitrarily large genus (Mikami, 2016).

6. Comparison with Complex Theory and Broader Context

Classically, cross-ratios of branch points for cyclic covers are expressed via Riemann theta functions on complex Jacobians, with the Thomae and Schottky–Jung formulas connecting even theta constants to moduli invariants. In the pp-adic context, the theta function construction is fully parallel: the sum over period lattices is replaced by pp-adic convergent series, and the exponential is modeled by a multiplicative bilinear pairing, yet preserves the combinatorial relation among characteristics and cross-ratios. This suggests a precise pp-adic analogue of the classical analytic theory interpolating between geometry, automorphy, and moduli (Kopeliovich, 30 Dec 2025).

7. Key Theorems and Results

Main classification for positive characteristic—due to Mikami (Mikami, 2016):

  • XX given by ypy=λi/(xai)y^p - y = \sum \lambda_i/(x-a_i) is a Mumford curve iff λiλj<aiaj2|\lambda_i \lambda_j| < |a_i - a_j|^2 for all iji \ne j.
  • The moduli space for such covers is determined by these quadratic inequalities.
  • For p=2p=2 or r=2,g=p1r=2,g=p-1, the results encompass classical Tate curve constructions and the split Artin–Schreier case.

Main analytic-theta function framework—following Kopeliovich (Kopeliovich, 30 Dec 2025):

  • The branch-point cross-ratio for cyclic Mumford covers is expressed as a quotient of pp-adic theta functions evaluated at the pp-adic period matrix.
  • Moduli invariants are encoded via explicit power series in the period matrix, making analysis of pp-adic variation of moduli possible in all genera.

These results comprise a comprehensive and explicit description of cyclic Mumford curves, bridging rigid analytic geometry, Galois theory of curves, and pp-adic special functions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (2)

Whiteboard

Topic to Video (Beta)

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Cyclic Mumford Curves.