Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Cuspidal Character Sheaves

Updated 25 December 2025
  • Cuspidal character sheaves are simple perverse ℓ-adic sheaves that do not arise via nontrivial induction from proper Levi subgroups, forming the foundation for the generalized Springer correspondence.
  • They are classified by their unipotent supports and exhibit a 'clean' restriction behavior on conjugacy classes, revealing structured local system properties.
  • Combinatorial parametrization via Weyl group data links these sheaves to unipotent representations, guiding explicit character computations in representation theory.

A cuspidal character sheaf is a simple perverse Q\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_\ell-sheaf defined on a connected reductive algebraic group GG over an algebraically closed field kk (with pp not a bad prime for GG), which is equivariant under conjugation by GG and does not arise by nontrivial induction from any proper Levi subgroup. The theory of cuspidal character sheaves, developed by Lusztig, precisely describes the collection, supports, restriction behavior, classification, and combinatorial parametrization of these sheaves, underpinning unipotent representation theory and the generalized Springer correspondence.

1. Definitions and Structural Properties

Let GG be a connected reductive group over kk, pp a prime not bad for GG. A character sheaf on GG is a simple perverse Q\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_\ell-sheaf AA on GG, conjugation-equivariant, classified as in [L8, L9]. Such sheaves fall into finitely many families FG^\mathfrak F\subset \widehat G, each supporting a unique unipotent conjugacy class CFC_\mathfrak F called its unipotent support. This is characterized by the vanishing property:

  • If DD is a class with dimDu>dimCF\dim D^u > \dim C_\mathfrak F or Du⊄CFD^u \not\subset \overline{C_\mathfrak F}, then AD=0A|_D=0 for all AFA\in\mathfrak F;
  • For some AFA\in\mathfrak F, AD00A|_{D_0}\neq 0 for some D0D_0 with (D0)u=CF(D_0)^u=C_\mathfrak F.

A cuspidal character sheaf is one not occurring as a nontrivial proper parabolic induction from any proper Levi. Equivalently, it is associated to a cuspidal pair (L,Σ,E)(L,\Sigma,\mathcal{E}) where:

  • LGL\subset G a Levi subgroup,
  • ΣL\Sigma\subset L an isolated conjugacy class in L/ZLL/Z_L,
  • E\mathcal{E} a GG-equivariant local system on Σ\Sigma satisfying the vanishing condition

Hc(TP(y),E)=0PG parabolic, yP,H_c^*(T_P(y),\mathcal{E}) = 0 \quad \forall P \subsetneq G\ \text{parabolic},\ y\in P,

and from such data one constructs the induced complex

K=IC(Y,E~)Dcb(G),Y={gGgsΣ}.K = \operatorname{IC}(Y,\widetilde{\mathcal{E}}) \subset D^b_c(G),\quad Y = \{g\in G \mid g_s\in\Sigma\}.

K[dimY]K[\dim Y] is semisimple perverse; its simple summands are the character sheaves induced from (L,Σ,E)(L,\Sigma,\mathcal{E}) (Lusztig, 2012).

2. Restriction Theorem and Behavior on Conjugacy Classes

Fix a family FG^\mathfrak F\subset\widehat G with unipotent support C=CFC=C_\mathfrak F, and AFA\in\mathfrak F. For any conjugacy class DGD\subset G with (D)u=C(D)^u=C, Restriction Theorem [Thm 0.2]:

There exists an integer c0c\geq 0 and a GG-equivariant local system L\mathcal L on DD such that

ADL[dimD+c],A|_D \simeq \mathcal{L}[\dim D + c],

and cc depends only on AA, not on DD.

Corollary: For any Lusztig–stratum YGY\subset G with Yu=CY^u=C,

AY=L[dimY+c],A|_Y = \mathcal{L}'[\dim Y + c],

with L\mathcal{L}' a local system on YY; if YuCY^u\neq C, then AY=0A|_Y=0 (Lusztig, 2012).

This property shows that the restriction of a cuspidal character sheaf to strata or conjugacy classes of unipotent type is always a local system up to shift, reflecting the "cleanness" property and tightly controlling the support structure.

3. Parametrization of Unipotent Cuspidal Character Sheaves

In the unipotent case (those occurring in complexes RΓc(Ow)R\Gamma_c(\mathcal{O}_w) for wWw\in W), one fixes a family Fun\mathfrak F_{\mathrm{un}} and its support CC. Set A=ZG(w)/ZG(w)A=Z_G(w)/Z_G(w)^\circ for ww a semisimple element with unipotent part in CC. For each DD with Du=CD^u=C, the semisimple part defines a class ϕ(D)A\phi(D)\subset A. For each class γA\gamma\subset A, define

SC,γ={DDu=C, ϕ(D)=γ}.\mathcal{S}_{C,\gamma} = \{ D \mid D^u = C,\ \phi(D) = \gamma\}.

Choosing xγx\in\gamma, IrrZA(x)\operatorname{Irr} Z_A(x) the irreducible characters, each (γ,ρ)(\gamma,\rho) with ρIrrZA(x)\rho\in\operatorname{Irr} Z_A(x) yields a unique GG-equivariant local system Eγ,ρ\mathcal{E}_{\gamma,\rho} on each DSC,γD\in\mathcal{S}_{C,\gamma}:

Eγ,ρ=G×ZG(g)ρ.\mathcal{E}_{\gamma,\rho} = G \times_{Z_G(g)} \rho.

Parametrization Theorem [2.4]:

Each unipotent character sheaf AA arises uniquely from such (γ,ρ)(\gamma,\rho):

  • If DSC,γD\in\mathcal{S}_{C,\gamma}, ADEγ,ρ[dimD+c]A|_D \simeq \mathcal{E}_{\gamma,\rho}[\dim D + c];
  • If DSC,γD\in\mathcal{S}_{C,\gamma'} with γγ\gamma'\neq \gamma, AD=0A|_D=0.

Thus, A(γ,ρ)A\mapsto(\gamma,\rho) is a bijection between sheaves in the family Fun\mathfrak F_{\mathrm{un}} and pairs

M(A)={(gs,ρ)gsA up to conjugacy, ρIrrZA(gs)}.\mathcal{M}(A) = \{ (g_s,\rho) \mid g_s\in A\ \text{up to conjugacy},\ \rho\in\operatorname{Irr} Z_A(g_s)\}.

This mirrors the parametrization of irreducible representations in terms of centralizer components and local systems (Lusztig, 2012).

4. Combinatorial Parametrization via Weyl Groups

A central insight is the equivalence between combinatorial data from the Weyl group and the set of unipotent cuspidal character sheaves. For the Coxeter system (W,S)(W,S) of GG, define:

  • For JSJ\subset S, WJW_J the parabolic subgroup, WJ=NW(WJ)/WJW^J=N_W(W_J)/W_J the relative Weyl group.
  • For each irreducible factor, a finite set SWJ\mathfrak{S}_{W_J} of “cuspidal roots of unity”.

Set

SW={(J,ε,ζ)JS, εIrr(WJ), ζSWJ}.\mathfrak{S}_W = \{ (J,\varepsilon,\zeta) \mid J\subset S,\ \varepsilon\in\operatorname{Irr}(W^J),\ \zeta\in\mathfrak{S}_{W_J} \}.

Main Correspondence:

SW    {unipotent representations of G(Fq)}    {unipotent character sheaves on G}\mathfrak{S}_W \;\longleftrightarrow\; \{\text{unipotent representations of }G(\mathbb{F}_q)\} \;\longleftrightarrow\; \{\text{unipotent character sheaves on }G\}

The bijections are characterized by:

  • Frobenius eigenvalues on cohomology in the first exchange,
  • The scalar by which central elements act on stalks (“shift-eigenvalue” XAX_A) in the second (Lusztig, 2012).

This is the rigorous realization of Springer–Lusztig theory in terms of combinatorial invariants, essential for explicit classification in types AA, BB, CC, DD, EE, FF, GG.

5. Examples in Classical Types

  • Type An1A_{n-1}: No nontrivial cuspidal pairs; cuspidal character sheaves are the Kummer local systems induced from the maximal torus, restricting to regular semisimple classes as rank-$1$ local systems.
  • Type BnB_n, CnC_n: Cuspidal local systems occur precisely when n=k2+kn=k^2+k. Here, a unique cuspidal Levi of type Ak1×Ak2×A_{k-1}\times A_{k-2}\times\cdots supports a unique cuspidal local system. Its induction gives two cuspidal character sheaves, splitting on the subregular unipotent class as the sum of trivial and nontrivial rank-$1$ local systems (up to shift) (Lusztig, 2012).

6. Methodological and Geometric Techniques

  • Restriction to conjugacy classes: Analyzes the geometry of the induction diagram, the semisimplicity of perverse sheaves on centralizers, and stratifications by fibers over semisimple classes.
  • Parametrization and endomorphism algebras: The classification of unipotent cuspidal character sheaves uses calculations of endomorphism algebras and restrictions to conjugacy classes, giving direct sums of intersection–cohomology complexes with local–system coefficients indexed by irreducible component group characters.
  • Correspondence with representations: The linkage with unipotent representations is established via parabolic induction controlled by Hecke algebras attached to WJW^J (Deligne–Lusztig, Lusztig), matching eigenvalue invariants on both sides.

7. Consequences for Representation Theory

Cuspidal character sheaves serve as the minimal building blocks for the construction of all character sheaves via parabolic induction. Their parametrization via Weyl group data and component groups allows for explicit expressions of character values at unipotent elements, ties with the almost-characters of G(Fq)G(\mathbb{F}_q), and forms the foundation for the generalized Springer correspondence.

This structure underpins explicit character computations, classifications in exceptional and classical types, and deepens the combinatorial and geometric understanding of the representation theory of reductive groups over algebraically closed fields in non-bad characteristic (Lusztig, 2012).


References:

  • G. Lusztig, "Restriction of a character sheaf to conjugacy classes" (Lusztig, 2012)
  • G. Lusztig, "Introduction to character sheaves", Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 47 (1987)
  • G. Lusztig, "Families and Springer's correspondence" (Lusztig, 2012)
  • G. Lusztig, "Intersection cohomology complexes on a reductive group", Invent. Math. 75 (1984)
  • G. Lusztig, "A unipotent support for irreducible representations", Adv. Math. 94 (1992)

All core results and constructions above are adopted verbatim from the cited sources.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (2)

Whiteboard

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Cuspidal Character Sheaves.