Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Critical Choquard Equation Overview

Updated 12 July 2026
  • Critical Choquard equations are nonlocal elliptic problems defined via convolution with Riesz or logarithmic kernels, exhibiting threshold criticality dictated by Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev inequalities.
  • Their analysis employs variational methods, explicit bubble profiles, and concentration-compactness techniques to overcome challenges from scaling invariance and loss of compactness.
  • Extensions to fractional, polyharmonic, and normalized settings reveal rich structures with applications in semiclassical analysis, ground state classification, and critical phenomenon exploration.

Critical Choquard equations are nonlocal elliptic equations in which the nonlinear term is generated by convolution with a Riesz, logarithmic, or related kernel, and the exponent is critical either in the sense of the Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev inequality or, in limiting Sobolev settings, in the sense of critical exponential growth. A representative model is

Δu+Vu=(Iαup)up2u,-\Delta u+V u=(I_\alpha*|u|^p)|u|^{p-2}u,

with lower critical exponent p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N} and upper critical exponent p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}. Higher-order conformally invariant counterparts include

(Δ)n2u(x)=(Rne2nμ2u(y)xyμdy)e2nμ2u(x).(-\Delta)^{\frac n2}u(x)=\left(\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(y)}}{|x-y|^\mu}\,dy\right)e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(x)}.

Across these settings, the theory combines classification of entire solutions, variational existence of ground states, threshold non-existence, multiplicity, and concentration analysis in autonomous, perturbed, semiclassical, fractional, and higher-order regimes (Moroz et al., 2014, Li et al., 2018, Huang et al., 2023).

1. Criticality and canonical formulations

The adjective “critical” refers to threshold exponents dictated by the Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev inequality. For the Choquard energy

RN(Iαup)updx,\int_{\mathbb R^N}(I_\alpha*|u|^p)|u|^p\,dx,

the lower critical exponent is p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}, while the upper critical exponent is p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}. In the lower-critical case, the convolution integral is invariant under translations and certain scalings, and a loss of compactness may occur; in the upper-critical case, the nonlocal term saturates the Sobolev embedding dictated by the Laplacian (Moroz et al., 2014, Liu et al., 2024).

A parallel terminology is used for more elaborate nonlinearities. In the doubly critical case one takes

F(u)=up+uq,p=N+αN,q=N+αN2,F(u)=|u|^p+|u|^q,\qquad p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N},\quad q=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2},

so that both critical Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev thresholds are present simultaneously. This produces two distinct scaling mechanisms and a correspondingly delicate compactness problem (Seok, 2017).

In limiting Sobolev regimes, criticality may be exponential rather than polynomial. This occurs in the one-dimensional fractional logarithmic Choquard equation

(Δ)12u+au+λ(lnu2)u=f(u)in R,(-\Delta)^{\frac12}u+a u+\lambda (\ln|\cdot|*|u|^2)u=f(u)\quad \text{in }\mathbb R,

and in zero-mass weighted NN-Laplacian problems in p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}0, where the admissible growth is controlled by Moser–Trudinger-type inequalities rather than power-type Sobolev embeddings (Böer et al., 2020, Romani, 2024).

Regime Critical expression Representative sources
Lower HLS criticality p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}1 (Moroz et al., 2014, Li et al., 2022)
Upper HLS criticality p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}2, p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}3 (Li et al., 2018, Gao et al., 2017)
Doubly criticality p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}4 with both critical exponents (Seok, 2017)
Critical exponential growth Moser–Trudinger-type growth (Böer et al., 2020, Romani, 2024)

2. Explicit solutions, bubbles, and classification

A recurrent feature of critical Choquard theory is the appearance of explicit bubble profiles. In the Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev critical minimization problem,

p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}5

the infimum is attained by

p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}6

for constants p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}7, p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}8, and p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}9. These functions serve both as exact optimizers and as the basic concentration profiles in blow-up and semiclassical analysis (Moroz et al., 2014).

For the higher-order critical Choquard equation in p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}0,

p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}1

Huang and Niu proved a full classification under the assumptions p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}2, p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}3 at infinity for p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}4, and the finiteness conditions

p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}5

p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}6

Every such solution has the explicit form

p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}7

The proof uses the method of moving spheres, an equivalent integral representation, Pohozaev-type identities, and the asymptotic estimate

p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}8

The result is presented as a Liouville-type classification of bubble solutions (Huang et al., 2023).

The same bubble paradigm governs asymptotic analysis in perturbed critical problems. For

p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}9

positive ground states, after a suitable rescaling, converge as (Δ)n2u(x)=(Rne2nμ2u(y)xyμdy)e2nμ2u(x).(-\Delta)^{\frac n2}u(x)=\left(\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(y)}}{|x-y|^\mu}\,dy\right)e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(x)}.0 to a particular solution of the critical equation

(Δ)n2u(x)=(Rne2nμ2u(y)xyμdy)e2nμ2u(x).(-\Delta)^{\frac n2}u(x)=\left(\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(y)}}{|x-y|^\mu}\,dy\right)e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(x)}.1

with dimension-dependent sharp rescaling laws in the cases (Δ)n2u(x)=(Rne2nμ2u(y)xyμdy)e2nμ2u(x).(-\Delta)^{\frac n2}u(x)=\left(\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(y)}}{|x-y|^\mu}\,dy\right)e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(x)}.2, (Δ)n2u(x)=(Rne2nμ2u(y)xyμdy)e2nμ2u(x).(-\Delta)^{\frac n2}u(x)=\left(\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(y)}}{|x-y|^\mu}\,dy\right)e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(x)}.3, and (Δ)n2u(x)=(Rne2nμ2u(y)xyμdy)e2nμ2u(x).(-\Delta)^{\frac n2}u(x)=\left(\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(y)}}{|x-y|^\mu}\,dy\right)e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(x)}.4 (Liu et al., 2024).

3. Variational structure and compactness mechanisms

The standard variational framework associates the equation with an energy functional on a natural Sobolev-type space. Depending on the model, this space may be (Δ)n2u(x)=(Rne2nμ2u(y)xyμdy)e2nμ2u(x).(-\Delta)^{\frac n2}u(x)=\left(\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(y)}}{|x-y|^\mu}\,dy\right)e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(x)}.5, (Δ)n2u(x)=(Rne2nμ2u(y)xyμdy)e2nμ2u(x).(-\Delta)^{\frac n2}u(x)=\left(\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(y)}}{|x-y|^\mu}\,dy\right)e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(x)}.6, (Δ)n2u(x)=(Rne2nμ2u(y)xyμdy)e2nμ2u(x).(-\Delta)^{\frac n2}u(x)=\left(\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(y)}}{|x-y|^\mu}\,dy\right)e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(x)}.7, (Δ)n2u(x)=(Rne2nμ2u(y)xyμdy)e2nμ2u(x).(-\Delta)^{\frac n2}u(x)=\left(\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(y)}}{|x-y|^\mu}\,dy\right)e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(x)}.8, a weighted homogeneous Sobolev space, or (Δ)n2u(x)=(Rne2nμ2u(y)xyμdy)e2nμ2u(x).(-\Delta)^{\frac n2}u(x)=\left(\int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(y)}}{|x-y|^\mu}\,dy\right)e^{\frac{2n-\mu}{2}u(x)}.9. Ground states are then sought by mountain-pass arguments, constrained minimization, or minimization on Nehari or Pohožaev manifolds (Ao, 2016, Li et al., 2018, Böer et al., 2020).

Criticality obstructs compactness through translation, dilation, and, in some problems, conformal invariance. A central technical response is concentration-compactness together with nonlocal splitting results. For the Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev critical exponent, Moroz and Van Schaftingen used concentration-compactness and a nonlocal version of the Brezis–Lieb lemma to recover compactness under the strict inequality RN(Iαup)updx,\int_{\mathbb R^N}(I_\alpha*|u|^p)|u|^p\,dx,0 (Moroz et al., 2014). In semiclassical critical-frequency problems, Ding, Gao, and Yang established a nonlocal global compactness lemma analogous to the Lions–Struwe result, together with energy splitting criteria for Palais–Smale sequences (Ding et al., 2017).

Another recurrent device is the Pohožaev constraint. In the autonomous upper-critical equation with general nonlinearity,

RN(Iαup)updx,\int_{\mathbb R^N}(I_\alpha*|u|^p)|u|^p\,dx,1

the ground state is obtained as a minimizer of the energy on the manifold defined by the Pohožaev identity, combined with subcritical approximation and Strauss’s compactness lemma for radially symmetric decreasing sequences (Li et al., 2018). In polyharmonic critical Choquard problems, explicit minimizers for the best Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev constant are used to place the mountain-pass level below the threshold

RN(Iαup)updx,\int_{\mathbb R^N}(I_\alpha*|u|^p)|u|^p\,dx,2

thereby recovering Palais–Smale compactness (Abhishek et al., 7 Jul 2026).

4. Existence and ground-state theory

Existence theory splits according to the form of the potential and the type of criticality. For the nonlinear Choquard equation

RN(Iαup)updx,\int_{\mathbb R^N}(I_\alpha*|u|^p)|u|^p\,dx,3

with RN(Iαup)updx,\int_{\mathbb R^N}(I_\alpha*|u|^p)|u|^p\,dx,4 and RN(Iαup)updx,\int_{\mathbb R^N}(I_\alpha*|u|^p)|u|^p\,dx,5, Moroz and Van Schaftingen proved that if RN(Iαup)updx,\int_{\mathbb R^N}(I_\alpha*|u|^p)|u|^p\,dx,6 and RN(Iαup)updx,\int_{\mathbb R^N}(I_\alpha*|u|^p)|u|^p\,dx,7, then the minimization problem is attained and the equation has a ground state. A sufficient condition for RN(Iαup)updx,\int_{\mathbb R^N}(I_\alpha*|u|^p)|u|^p\,dx,8 is

RN(Iαup)updx,\int_{\mathbb R^N}(I_\alpha*|u|^p)|u|^p\,dx,9

When p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}0, one has p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}1, and no ground state exists (Moroz et al., 2014).

For autonomous upper-critical equations, existence is known both for pure and for combined nonlinearities. The equation

p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}2

with p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}3 admits a nontrivial solution for p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}4, p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}5, and for p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}6, p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}7; the corresponding minimizing problem also has a minimizer (Ao, 2016). More generally, “Choquard equations with critical nonlinearities” establishes positive, radially symmetric, radially nonincreasing ground states for both the lower and upper critical exponents by combining subcritical approximation with the Pohožaev constraint method (Li et al., 2018). For the doubly critical nonlinearity p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}8, a nontrivial solution exists when p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}9 and p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}0 (Seok, 2017).

Bounded-domain existence at the upper critical exponent exhibits a Brezis–Nirenberg-type structure. In dimension three, for

p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}1

the following are equivalent: the existence of a least energy solution, the strict inequality p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}2, and positivity of the Robin function p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}3 somewhere in p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}4. This equivalence leads to a notion of critical potential p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}5, and under perturbation p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}6 with p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}7 critical, least energy solutions exist if the set

p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}8

is nonempty (Gao, 25 Mar 2026).

5. Non-existence, multiplicity, and concentration

Critical Choquard equations exhibit sharp threshold non-existence phenomena as well as multiplicity above threshold. For the combined equation

p=N+αN2p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2}9

when one of F(u)=up+uq,p=N+αN,q=N+αN2,F(u)=|u|^p+|u|^q,\qquad p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N},\quad q=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2},0 or F(u)=up+uq,p=N+αN,q=N+αN2,F(u)=|u|^p+|u|^q,\qquad p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N},\quad q=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2},1 is critical, the parameter space F(u)=up+uq,p=N+αN,q=N+αN2,F(u)=|u|^p+|u|^q,\qquad p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N},\quad q=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2},2 splits into regions of non-existence and multiplicity. In particular, for F(u)=up+uq,p=N+αN,q=N+αN2,F(u)=|u|^p+|u|^q,\qquad p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N},\quad q=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2},3 and F(u)=up+uq,p=N+αN,q=N+αN2,F(u)=|u|^p+|u|^q,\qquad p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N},\quad q=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2},4, there exists F(u)=up+uq,p=N+αN,q=N+αN2,F(u)=|u|^p+|u|^q,\qquad p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N},\quad q=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2},5 such that no positive ground state exists for F(u)=up+uq,p=N+αN,q=N+αN2,F(u)=|u|^p+|u|^q,\qquad p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N},\quad q=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2},6, while ground states exist for F(u)=up+uq,p=N+αN,q=N+αN2,F(u)=|u|^p+|u|^q,\qquad p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N},\quad q=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2},7; for F(u)=up+uq,p=N+αN,q=N+αN2,F(u)=|u|^p+|u|^q,\qquad p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N},\quad q=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2},8, there is a larger threshold F(u)=up+uq,p=N+αN,q=N+αN2,F(u)=|u|^p+|u|^q,\qquad p=\frac{N+\alpha}{N},\quad q=\frac{N+\alpha}{N-2},9 such that at least two positive solutions exist for (Δ)12u+au+λ(lnu2)u=f(u)in R,(-\Delta)^{\frac12}u+a u+\lambda (\ln|\cdot|*|u|^2)u=f(u)\quad \text{in }\mathbb R,0. The same work notes that uniqueness is largely open except for special cases (Ma, 2024).

Potential-well and semiclassical problems add concentration phenomena. In

(Δ)12u+au+λ(lnu2)u=f(u)in R,(-\Delta)^{\frac12}u+a u+\lambda (\ln|\cdot|*|u|^2)u=f(u)\quad \text{in }\mathbb R,1

with (Δ)12u+au+λ(lnu2)u=f(u)in R,(-\Delta)^{\frac12}u+a u+\lambda (\ln|\cdot|*|u|^2)u=f(u)\quad \text{in }\mathbb R,2 nonempty and bounded, ground states exist for (Δ)12u+au+λ(lnu2)u=f(u)in R,(-\Delta)^{\frac12}u+a u+\lambda (\ln|\cdot|*|u|^2)u=f(u)\quad \text{in }\mathbb R,3 large enough and localize near (Δ)12u+au+λ(lnu2)u=f(u)in R,(-\Delta)^{\frac12}u+a u+\lambda (\ln|\cdot|*|u|^2)u=f(u)\quad \text{in }\mathbb R,4 as (Δ)12u+au+λ(lnu2)u=f(u)in R,(-\Delta)^{\frac12}u+a u+\lambda (\ln|\cdot|*|u|^2)u=f(u)\quad \text{in }\mathbb R,5; for (Δ)12u+au+λ(lnu2)u=f(u)in R,(-\Delta)^{\frac12}u+a u+\lambda (\ln|\cdot|*|u|^2)u=f(u)\quad \text{in }\mathbb R,6, at least (Δ)12u+au+λ(lnu2)u=f(u)in R,(-\Delta)^{\frac12}u+a u+\lambda (\ln|\cdot|*|u|^2)u=f(u)\quad \text{in }\mathbb R,7 distinct solutions are obtained by Lusternik–Schnirelmann category theory (Gao et al., 2017). In the critical-frequency case (Δ)12u+au+λ(lnu2)u=f(u)in R,(-\Delta)^{\frac12}u+a u+\lambda (\ln|\cdot|*|u|^2)u=f(u)\quad \text{in }\mathbb R,8 with (Δ)12u+au+λ(lnu2)u=f(u)in R,(-\Delta)^{\frac12}u+a u+\lambda (\ln|\cdot|*|u|^2)u=f(u)\quad \text{in }\mathbb R,9, the pure critical problem has at least NN0 semiclassical solutions for small NN1, and the double-critical problem has arbitrarily many pairs of semiclassical solutions with small energy (Ding et al., 2017). In singularly perturbed critical problems in NN2, positive ground states concentrate near maxima of NN3 or minima of NN4, and the number of positive solutions is bounded below by the corresponding Lusternik–Schnirelmann category (Alves et al., 2016).

Multiplicity can also arise without semiclassical scaling. For

NN5

there are at least two distinct positive solutions for small NN6 under a smallness assumption on NN7, but the paper emphasizes that these are not ground states and that ground state solutions do not exist under its hypotheses (Alves et al., 2018). A different phenomenon appears in the non-radial setting: if NN8 is bounded, nonnegative, radially symmetric, NN9, p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}00, and p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}01 has an isolated local maximum or isolated local minimum at some p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}02 with p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}03, then

p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}04

has infinitely many non-radial solutions with arbitrarily large energies, constructed by Lyapunov–Schmidt finite dimensional reduction. The same source states that if p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}05 has constant sign and is not identically zero, then the Pohozaev identity yields non-existence (Caputo et al., 21 Jul 2025).

6. Fractional, normalized, logarithmic, exponential, and polyharmonic extensions

The critical Choquard framework extends well beyond the standard Laplacian on p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}06. Fractional and singular models include

p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}07

on bounded domains, where positive and sign-changing solutions are obtained under suitable assumptions on the critical Hardy–Sobolev and Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev exponents (Yang et al., 2019). An even more singular problem combines a fractional Laplacian, a Hardy potential, a singular term p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}08, a critical Choquard term, and a Radon measure; in that setting, one proves existence of a positive SOLA, meaning a solution obtained as the limit of approximations, for sufficiently small p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}09 (Panda et al., 2020).

Normalized and logarithmic variants show that criticality interacts strongly with constraints and kernel choice. For the lower critical normalized problem

p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}10

there is existence of normalized ground states for p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}11, non-existence at the mass-critical value p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}12 under p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}13, and multiplicity in the non-autonomous case, with the number of normalized solutions bounded below by the number of global maxima of the weight p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}14 when p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}15 is small (Li et al., 2022). For the one-dimensional logarithmic equation with critical exponential growth,

p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}16

one obtains a nontrivial mountain-pass solution, a ground state under critical or subcritical exponential growth, and infinitely many pairs of solutions under subcritical growth and an oddness assumption on p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}17 (Böer et al., 2020).

Zero-mass and higher-order settings further broaden the theory. In the weighted p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}18-Laplacian problem

p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}19

variational methods yield a positive, radially symmetric weak solution for both subcritical and critical exponential nonlinearities (Romani, 2024). For the p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}20-harmonic equation with critical Choquard nonlinearity and subcritical perturbation,

p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}21

the existence of nontrivial solutions is obtained by combining minimizers for the sharp critical Choquard inequality with refined threshold estimates; the work states that it is the first article dealing with the polyharmonic equation and critical Choquard type nonlinearity, and that the results are new for p=N+αNp=\frac{N+\alpha}{N}22 (Abhishek et al., 7 Jul 2026).

Taken together, these developments show that the phrase “critical Choquard equation” does not denote a single equation but a family of nonlocal critical problems whose common analytic core is the interaction between convolution nonlinearity, critical embedding, and loss of compactness. The explicit bubble profiles, Pohožaev identities, threshold inequalities, and concentration mechanisms occurring across the literature indicate a unified structure, while the fractional, logarithmic, exponential, zero-mass, normalized, and polyharmonic extensions show that the range of admissible critical phenomena is substantially broader than the classical whole-space Hartree model.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Critical Choquard Equation.