Core-Convective Dynamos in Planets and Stars

• Core-convective dynamos are self-sustained magnetic fields generated by turbulent convection and rapid rotation in planetary and stellar interiors.
• They are governed by thermodynamic controls and a MAC force balance that links energy, convection vigor, and magnetic field strength.
• Distinct convective regimes and scaling laws inform numerical simulations and observational strategies for understanding planetary habitability and stellar evolution.

Core-convective dynamos refer to the self-excited, statistically steady dynamos maintained within the convective regions deep inside planetary or stellar interiors—most prominently in the liquid metal cores of terrestrial planets, and in the convective cores of certain main sequence stars. The paper of such dynamos entails understanding the interplay between turbulent thermal (and, by extension, compositional) convection, rapid system rotation, and electromagnetic induction, leading to the maintenance of large-scale magnetic fields. These processes underpin the persistence and geometry of planetary and stellar magnetic fields with implications for atmospheric retention, habitability, and stellar evolution.

1. Thermodynamic and Structural Controls in Planetary Dynamos

Core-convective dynamos in terrestrial planets are fundamentally controlled by energy and entropy budgets that link the rate of core cooling to the vigor of convection and ultimately to the magnetic field amplitude. In rocky planets, the metallic Fe core convects if sufficient heat and compositional buoyancy are extracted across the core–mantle boundary (CMB). The thermal evolution couples the internal structure with the efficiency of heat loss, as encapsulated in the energy balance equation

$Q_S + Q_L + Q_G = Q_c,$

where $Q_S$ (sensible heat), $Q_L$ (latent heat from solidification), and $Q_G$ (gravitational energy from compositional buoyancy) must meet the CMB heat flux $Q_c$. The dynamics are further shaped by pressure–temperature relations, notably via the comparison of slopes between the core adiabat and the Fe solidus, with

$$\Delta = \frac{(dT/dP)_{\text{adiabat}}}{(d\tau/dP)_{\text{solidus}}}$$

as a critical controlling parameter. For $\Delta > 1$, inner core nucleation proceeds centrally; for $\Delta < 1$ (a regime prevalent in “super-Earths” >2.5 Earth masses), iron “snow” crystallizes near the top of the core, significantly stifling convection and the dynamo (Gaidos et al., 2010). The history, intensity, and longevity of magnetodynamos depend sensitively on core size, solidus, and mantle tectonic mode (mobile lid/plate tectonics or stagnant lid), with mantle viscosity and surface temperature modulating the boundary-layer heat transfer [(Summeren et al., 2013); (Dietrich et al., 2015)].

2. Force Balances: The MAC Paradigm

A haLLMark of deep core dynamos is the establishment of a MAC (Magnetic, Archimedean, Coriolis) force balance, in which the dominant equilibrium is among the residual (ageostrophic) Coriolis, Lorentz, and buoyancy forces:

$$2 \rho\Omega \times \mathbf{u} + (\nabla \times \mathbf{B}) \times \mathbf{B} - \rho\alpha \delta T \mathbf{g} \approx 0$$

In the limit of low viscosity and rapid rotation (Ekman $E$ ≪ 1, magnetic Prandtl $Pm$ ≪ 1), inertia and viscous forces are subdominant except possibly at the smallest scales. Under these conditions, convection organizes into columnar structures (geostrophic columns), but the Lorentz force acts to break perfect Taylor–Proudman alignment, generating larger, less-axially-invariant structures and enhancing heat transport (Nusselt number increases), thus critically controlling the energy-containing length scales (Schaeffer et al., 2017, Yadav et al., 2016, Hughes et al., 2015, Sheyko et al., 2017).

Notably, in strong-field regimes

$\frac{E_{\text{mag}}}{E_{\text{kin}}} \gg 1$

so that magnetic feedback is dynamically dominant, and dissipation is primarily Ohmic, not viscous. This regime—with Ohmic dissipation rates potentially reaching 10 TW in Earth's core—reflects the actual energy partitioning in planetary interiors as inferred from geomagnetic data and thermal profiles (Sheyko et al., 2017).

3. Convective Regimes, Lengthscales, and Turbulence

The characteristic convective lengthscale in core-convective dynamos is determined by the interplay between flow velocity and rotation, independent of viscosity:

$L \sim U/|\beta|^{1/2}$

where $U$ is a typical flow speed and $\beta$ encodes geometrical effects of the spherical shell (Guervilly et al., 2018). For Earth's core, this yields a cutoff at ≈30 km; below this scale, motions are too weak to support small-scale dynamo action, thus supporting the use of large-eddy simulations and sub-grid parameterizations.

As Ekman number decreases and the system becomes more turbulent ('ultra–low viscosity' limit), a separation emerges: velocity fields become dominated by small scales, while magnetic fields organize at larger scales, characteristic of magnetostrophic balance ((Sheyko et al., 2017); $l_B/l_u \sim E^{-\alpha}$). This scale separation influences the efficiency of magnetic field induction, secures the dominance of Ohmic over viscous dissipation, and changes the dynamical morphology of both flows and fields.

4. Buoyancy Sources and Double-Diffusive Effects

Core convection may be powered not only by thermal gradients but also by compositional differentiation (e.g., inner core growth expelling light elements). These differing buoyancy sources have distinct diffusivities; compositional diffusivity is orders of magnitude less than thermal. In the double-diffusive regime (Lewis number $Le = \kappa_T/\kappa_C \gg 1$), flow morphologies can differ (plume-dominated for compositional, larger-scale for thermal). However, in the strong-field limit at planetary core parameters, numerical simulations show that dynamo and secular variation properties are largely insensitive to the source of buoyancy, validating the computational expediency of the co-density approach for planetary dynamos (Fan et al., 13 Aug 2025).

5. Transient Forcing: Magma Oceans and Boundary Heterogeneities

Noncanonical drivers—such as basal magma oceans (pre-inner-core Earth) or variations in CMB heat flow (due to deep mantle plumes, giant impacts, or planetary surface heterogeneities)—impart toroidal and poloidal velocity components in the core, with measurable impacts on dynamo efficiency and symmetry (Dutta et al., 30 Jul 2025, Dietrich et al., 2015). For example, a convecting basal magma ocean can linearly couple its convective vigor (Nusselt number $Nu_{\rm MO}$) to the amplitude of driven flow in the core, offering a plausible solution to the paradox of early geomagnetic evidence predating inner core nucleation (Dutta et al., 30 Jul 2025).

Strong and wide CMB heat flux anomalies can generate hemispherical (equatorially antisymmetric, axisymmetric, EAA) flows, but only planetary-scale, intense anomalies can produce significant hemisphericity in the surface field. However, such configurations yield rapid field reversals, inconsistent with, for example, the stable hemispherical crustal magnetization observed on Mars (Dietrich et al., 2015).

6. Core-Convective Dynamos in Stars

In stars with convective cores (e.g., A-type and B-type stars), robust dynamo action produces intense internal fields (tens of kG in A stars, reaching super-equipartition MG fields in B stars), organized into cycles with periods that scale as negative powers of the rotation period:

$P_{\text{cyc}} \propto P_{\text{rot}}^{-0.89}$

Differential rotation in these convective cores is typically solar-like, but strong fossil fields (closed poloidal configurations) can enhance the core dynamo, resulting in superequipartition states (magnetic energy five times kinetic), induce more rigid rotation in the radiative envelope, and switch differential rotation from solar-like to anti-solar (Hidalgo et al., 26 Sep 2024, Hidalgo et al., 1 Jun 2025). Despite the internal dynamo vigor, only minute fractions of the magnetic energy reach the stellar surface; alternative mechanisms (e.g., fossil fields, envelope dynamos) are required to explain the stable, often dipolar, surface magnetism of Ap/Bp stars.

In low-mass stars, observationally calibrated convective turnover timescales sharply rise at the fully convective boundary (0.35–0.4 M⊙), supporting the role of deep-seated dynamo mechanisms—core or deep-envelope convection—in both partially and fully convective regimes. Empirical Rossby number dependencies of activity are consistent across the divide, but fully convective stars exhibit torques and large-scale dipole fields ∼2.25 and ∼2.5 times larger, respectively, than partially convective peers, indicating a change in global dynamo properties across the structural transition (Gossage et al., 25 Oct 2024, Lu et al., 2023).

7. Key Scaling Laws and Observational Implications

The amplitude of the magnetic field in both planetary and stellar core-convective dynamos can be related to the available convective power:

$$B_c \approx a_1\left[\mu_0 \rho \phi T (R_c-R_i)\right]^{1/3}$$

with entropy production rate $\phi$ taking contributions from secular cooling, latent heat, and compositional sources [(Gaidos et al., 2010); (Summeren et al., 2013)]. For planetary dynamos, the surface field (dipole component) is estimated by

$B_p \approx B_c (R_c/R_p)^3$

The local Rossby number

$Ro_\ell = Ro/L_u$

acting as a transition parameter for dipole stability, with a critical threshold (previously ∼0.1) that may be exceeded if strong Lorentz–Coriolis balance (Elsasser number Λ′ ≳ 1) is maintained (Menu et al., 2020). For white dwarfs, dynamo scaling laws in the fast-rotating regime predict

$$B \propto \left( \frac{t_{\rm conv}}{P} \right)^{1/2}$$

and for convective-surface dynamos,

$B \propto T_{\rm eff}$

as the cooling and convection zone dynamics evolve (Ginzburg et al., 2022, Yaakovyan et al., 23 May 2025).

Detection of exoplanetary magnetism via proxies (e.g., auroral radio, star–planet interaction) can, with these scaling relations, place constraints on interior properties (e.g., core size, tectonic state), but interpretation is highly degenerate.

8. Limitations, Degeneracies, and Future Directions

Modern numerical models reach parameter regimes ever closer to Earth's core, but practical limitations on viscosity and resolution maintain uncertainties regarding the smallest-scale processes and the precise conditions for field reversals. Variations in physical parameters (core solidus, mantle rheology, initial enthalpy) can produce similar dynamo histories, rendering magnetic field presence an ambiguous indicator of, for example, plate tectonics or core properties (Summeren et al., 2013). For planetary cores with both thermal and compositional driving, the degeneracy at the level of surface field morphology between double-diffusive and co-density models reinforces this difficulty (Fan et al., 13 Aug 2025).

Current research priorities include further reduction of viscosity in global models to solidify the MAC balance regime, improved observational proxies for exoplanet magnetism, and deeper integration of compositional and phase-change-driven dynamics, as well as further investigation of the interplay between dynamo-generated and fossil fields in stellar interiors.

---

In summary, core-convective dynamos constitute the principal engines of magnetic field generation in a variety of astrophysical objects ranging from terrestrial planets (Earth, exoplanets) to main sequence stars (A/B types, fully convective M dwarfs, white dwarfs). Their operation, efficiency, and observable consequences are set by a confluence of thermodynamic, diffusive, and rotational parameters—modulated by boundary conditions and compositional evolution—supporting a wide diversity in magnetic morphology and intensity. Ongoing theoretical, numerical, and observational work is required to disentangle the degenerate signatures of internal structure and to fully understand their role in planetary and stellar evolution.