Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
95 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Premium
52 tokens/sec
GPT-5 Medium
20 tokens/sec
GPT-5 High Premium
28 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
100 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Premium
98 tokens/sec
GPT OSS 120B via Groq Premium
459 tokens/sec
Kimi K2 via Groq Premium
197 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

On Convective Turnover Times and Dynamos In Low-Mass Stars (2410.20000v1)

Published 25 Oct 2024 in astro-ph.SR

Abstract: The relationship between magnetic activity and Rossby number is one way through which stellar dynamos can be understood. Using measured rotation rates and X-ray to bolometric luminosity ratios of an ensemble of stars, we derive empirical convective turnover times based on recent observations and re-evaluate the X-ray activity-Rossby number relationship. In doing so, we find a sharp rise in the convective turnover time for stars in the mass range of $0.35-0.4\ \rm M_{\odot}$, associated with the onset of a fully convective internal stellar structure. Using $\texttt{MESA}$ stellar evolution models, we infer the location of dynamo action implied by the empirical convective turnover time. The empirical convective turnover time is found to be indicative of dynamo action deep within the convective envelope in stars with masses $0.1-1.2\ \rm M_{\odot}$, crossing the fully convective boundary. Our results corroborate past works suggesting that partially and fully convective stars follow the same activity-Rossby relation, possibly owing to similar dynamo mechanisms. Our stellar models also give insight into the dynamo mechanism. We find that empirically determined convective turnover times correlate with properties of the deep stellar interior. These findings are in agreement with global dynamo models that see a reservoir of magnetic flux accumulate deep in the convection zone before buoyantly rising to the surface.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.