Canonical Agent Architecture Essentials

• Canonical agent architecture is a modular, layered framework that defines agent roles, communication protocols, and model-driven engineering methods for multi-agent systems.
• It enables plug-and-play extensibility and robust coordination through clearly separated layers and functional modules, enhancing scalability across diverse applications.
• It integrates discovery, formal modeling, and secure interoperability to support dynamic evolution, task allocation, and comprehensive system governance.

A canonical agent architecture describes the reference structure, modules, and interaction mechanisms underlying the design and implementation of multi-agent systems (MAS). Such architectures seek to maximize genericity, modularity, extensibility, and robustness while supporting diverse agent behaviors, efficient inter-agent coordination, and integration with model-driven engineering and contemporary multi-layered system paradigms. Canonical frameworks formally define component relationships, agent types, communication protocols, and often incorporate mechanisms for model transformation, code generation, capability discovery, and system evolution.

1. Structural Composition and Layered Organization

Canonical agent architectures are typically organized using a modular, layered approach, ensuring separation of concerns and scalability across application domains (Maalal et al., 2012, Weyns et al., 2019):

• Component-Layered Decomposition: Architectures frequently separate the MAS into distinct layers featuring environmental abstractions, agent types, and interaction mechanisms. Early models (e.g., (Maalal et al., 2012)) define explicit Environment and Agent classes, with further refinement into specialized agent types (Reactive, Cognitive, Communicative, Adaptive, Intentional, Rational), each with unique role and behavioral modules—codified via AUML/UML or formal ADLs.
• Functional Decomposition: More recent frameworks (e.g., CACA Agent (Xu et al., 22 Mar 2024), LLM-Agent-UMF (Hassouna et al., 17 Sep 2024)) expand this decomposition to functional modules such as planning, memory, action execution, profile management, and security. The “core-agent” abstraction in LLM-Agent-UMF, for example, explicitly enumerates these responsibilities in a modular fashion.
• Hierarchical and Federated Structures: Architectures like AgentOrchestra (Zhang et al., 14 Jun 2025) and the AGNTCY Agent Directory Service (ADS) (Muscariello et al., 23 Sep 2025) employ hierarchical or federated models. A planning (or central) agent decomposes tasks and allocates sub-tasks to specialized agents, while layered service, collaboration, management, and resource components support robust operations at scale (Liu et al., 18 May 2025).

Example: Agent Type Layering (Maalal et al., 2012)

Layer	Agent Specialization	Core Methods/Functions
1	Agent, Environment	Run(), Perceive(), Act()
2	Reactive, Cognitive, Comm.	Decide(), Communicate(), ...
3	Adaptive, Intentional (BDI), Rational	Change_information(), Revise_beliefs(), Mesure_performance()

This structural modularity enables plug-and-play extensibility and flexible reasoning strategies.

2. Agent Behavior, Capabilities, and Roles

Canonical agent architectures define clear distinctions among agent behaviors, often codifying:

• Agent Role and Functionality Modules: Each agent has explicit roles and capabilities, such as perception (environment or peer sensing), action selection (including behavior- and role-based decision making), communication (direct message passing and indirect virtual environment manipulation), and (optional) specialized reasoning (e.g., BDI—Belief-Desire-Intention).
• Capability Collaboration and Decoupling: CACA Agent (Xu et al., 22 Mar 2024) demonstrates open, collaborative capability modules (Reception, Workflow, Planning, Methodology, Tool, Profile), decoupling task decomposition, execution, and tool invocation, often mathematically formalized (e.g., $$PlanCap(Task, Methodology) \rightarrow [Proc(ST_1), ..., Proc(ST_n)]$$).
• Classification of Agents: LLM-Agent-UMF (Hassouna et al., 17 Sep 2024) introduces "core-agent" components, further classified into active (with planning, memory, profile, action, and security) and passive (stateless executors)—enabling multi-core agent architectures (uniform or hybrid).

The system supports both specialization (e.g., Deep Researcher Agent, Browser Use Agent, Deep Analyzer Agent in AgentOrchestra (Zhang et al., 14 Jun 2025)) and composition via protocol-based communication and dynamic task allocation.

3. Communication and Coordination Mechanisms

Inter-agent communication is foundational—canonical architectures employ diverse protocols and orchestration patterns:

• Agent Communication Protocols: Standardized message semantics through Agent Communication Languages (ACLs, e.g., FIPA protocols), Model Context Protocol (MCP), Application-to-Application (A2A), and advanced Agent Collaboration Protocols (ACPs) (Liu et al., 18 May 2025) ensure that agents interpret intent, negotiate capabilities, and orchestrate complex multi-step workflows.
• Stream and Pub/Sub Models: Stream-based orchestration (as in compound AI blueprint architecture (Kandogan et al., 10 Apr 2025)) allows agents to share data and control messages, observe the system's state, and coordinate synchronously or asynchronously.
• Decentralized Coordination: Architectures like AIOS Server (Zhang et al., 19 Apr 2025) and the ACP-based Internet of Agents (Liu et al., 18 May 2025) implement peer-to-peer, gossip, and DHT-based discovery, eliminating centralized orchestration and supporting global-scale collaboration and resilience.
• Dynamic Task and Resource Planning: Task planners (often formulated as DAGs) and data planners allocate sub-tasks to agents, select data sources, and optimize execution per cost, accuracy, and latency constraints (Kandogan et al., 10 Apr 2025).

Canonical systems thus provide both flexible composition (orchestrator-worker, hierarchical agent patterns) and robust interaction, crucial for heterogeneous, large-scale deployments.

4. Model-Driven Engineering and Code Generation

Canonical approaches emphasize the use of model-driven methodologies for engineering and implementation (Maalal et al., 2012):

• Model-Driven Architecture (MDA): Systems are first specified as platform-independent models (PIM), mapped via transformations ($PSM = T(PIM)$) to platform-specific source code (e.g., Java+Spring, Hibernate) using tools such as AndroMDA.
• Reusable Libraries of Models: AUML/UML-based meta-models serve as repositories of generic, extensible agent templates. This practice fosters reusability, design consistency, and streamlines code generation, as seen in the ChatAgents application case (Maalal et al., 2012).
• Formal Pattern Specification: Formal ADLs (pi-ADL in (Weyns et al., 2019)) or schema-driven frameworks (OASF in (Muscariello et al., 23 Sep 2025)) encode reusable architectural patterns, supporting specification, type checking, extensibility, and forward compatibility.

Such model-driven paradigms accelerate development and facilitate adaptation to new platforms without extensive re-architecting.

5. Discovery, Registration, and Interoperability

Discovery of agent capabilities, secure registration, and multi-dimensional interoperability are essential for ecosystems at scale:

• Distributed Directory and Indexing: AGNTCY ADS (Muscariello et al., 23 Sep 2025) describes a layered system in which agent records (skills, domains, features) are stored, addressed, indexed, and signed using content-addressed storage (CIDs) and DHTs, with multi-dimensional queries and federated registry support. Sigstore-based signing provides provenance and tamper evidence.
• Standardized Schemas: Records follow extensible schemas (e.g., OASF) supporting versioning, extensions for emerging modalities (LLM prompt agents, MCP endpoints), and detached metadata (metrics, provenance, composition graphs).
• Security and Trust: Cryptographic mechanisms (SHA-256 digests, Sigstore signatures) and hierarchical trust models enable cross-organizational, verifiable agent discovery. Combination with peer authentication and session security (as in ACPs (Liu et al., 18 May 2025)) ensures secure, scalable collaboration.

This layer enables robust agent onboarding, evolutionary extension, and multi-vendor interoperability.

6. Scalability, Modularity, and Evolution

Scalability and modularity are achieved through several architectural features and deployment strategies:

• Microservices-oriented Approaches: Migrating from monolithic MAS to microservices (each agent as an independent service) provides independent deployment, resource isolation, agility in upgrades, and fault containment (Goyal et al., 5 May 2025).
• Extensibility and Updatability: Canonical architectures (e.g., CACA Agent (Xu et al., 22 Mar 2024), multi-core LLM agent frameworks (Hassouna et al., 17 Sep 2024)) employ registration-discovery-invocation mechanisms and modular capability updates, ensuring that new agent types, tools, or planners can be integrated seamlessly.
• Schema-Forward Compatibility: Extensions and detached referrers allow new features, evaluation metrics, or operational properties to be incorporated without schema breakage or service interruption (Muscariello et al., 23 Sep 2025).
• Dynamic Resource Scheduling: Protocols such as ACP (Liu et al., 18 May 2025) include dynamic resource demand prediction and adaptive scheduling, ensuring efficient utilization across cloud and edge resources.

Such designs allow agent systems to scale horizontally, evolve over time, and adapt to workload and modality demands.

7. Formalization, Governance, and Alignment

Canonical agent architectures increasingly formalize system properties, enable alignment with stakeholder objectives, and incorporate governance:

• Formal Specification: Use of formal ADLs (e.g., pi-ADL) assures correct composability and enables rigorous validation of components (Weyns et al., 2019).
• Alignment with Organizational Objectives: Architectures such as HADA (Pitkäranta et al., 1 Jun 2025) operationalize business KPIs, value constraints, and ethics within the agent pipeline. Role-specific agents (business, data science, audit, ethics, customer) ensure that all decisions are traceable, auditable, and aligned with strategic intent.
• Performance and Trust Metrics: Protocols for telemetry collection (DOVIS (Krishnamachari et al., 5 Sep 2025)), coupled with privacy-preserving aggregation and trust-aware ranking algorithms (AgentRank-UC—combining usage and competence), support trustworthy, performance-driven agent selection and orchestration at web scale.

This formal, governance-oriented perspective is increasingly central to next-generation autonomous ecosystems.

---

In summary, the canonical agent architecture paradigm has evolved from meta-model-driven, component-oriented designs to highly modular, schema-extensible, and discovery-centric ecosystems. Principal characteristics include layered decomposition (environment, agent, capability, and service separation), specification of reusable behavioral and communication patterns, model-driven code generation for rapid deployment, robust discovery and interoperability protocols, and formal mechanisms for alignment, governance, and auditability across multi-agent systems. These foundational attributes support scalable, evolutive, and trustworthy agentic networks across diverse application domains (Maalal et al., 2012, Weyns et al., 2019, Xu et al., 22 Mar 2024, Hassouna et al., 17 Sep 2024, Kandogan et al., 10 Apr 2025, Goyal et al., 5 May 2025, Liu et al., 18 May 2025, Pitkäranta et al., 1 Jun 2025, Zhang et al., 14 Jun 2025, Chang et al., 18 Jul 2025, Krishnamachari et al., 5 Sep 2025, Muscariello et al., 23 Sep 2025).