Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Bumpless Pipedreams in Algebraic Combinatorics

Updated 20 December 2025
  • Bumpless pipedreams are combinatorial models in symmetric function theory that generalize classical Stanley symmetric functions using double weight enumerations and bijective tableau correspondences.
  • They employ reduced signed increasing factorizations and primed tableaux to connect type A and type C Stanley symmetric functions, yielding explicit Schur function expansions.
  • The framework integrates Coxeter group theory, tableau conversions, and crystal operators to offer new insights and conjectural extensions in algebraic combinatorics.

Bumpless pipedreams, in the context of symmetric function theory and representation-theoretic combinatorics, refer to combinatorial models that generalize the classical Stanley symmetric functions and their connections to crystal structures, tableaux, and algebraic identities. In particular, bumpless pipedreams facilitate the combinatorial description of double Stanley symmetric functions, which interpolate between the type AnA_n and type CnC_n Stanley symmetric functions via specializations in two sets of variables. These constructions interface Coxeter group theory, tableau combinatorics, and the structure of algebraic symmetric functions in a unified framework (Hawkes, 2018).

1. Coxeter Group Framework and Factorizations

The foundation utilizes Coxeter groups: let AnA_n denote the group generated by s1,,sns_1, \dots, s_n with braid and commutation relations; Cn+1C_{n+1} is generated by s0,s1,...,sns_0, s_1, ..., s_n with (s0s1)4=1(s_0s_1)^4=1, (sisi+1)3=1(s_is_{i+1})^3=1 for i1i\geq1, and (sisj)2=1(s_is_j)^2=1 otherwise. A “reduced signed increasing factorization” (RSIFk(ω)\mathrm{RSIF}_k(\omega)) of ωCn+1\omega\in C_{n+1} into kk parts is a reduced word u=u1u2uu=u_1u_2\cdots u_\ell (with letters in {sn,,s1,s0,s1,,sn}\{s_{-n},…,s_{-1},s_0,s_1,…,s_n\}), subdivided into kk contiguous factors v=(v(1))(v(2))(v(k))\mathbf{v}=(v^{(1)})(v^{(2)})\cdots(v^{(k)}) such that each v(i)v^{(i)} is strictly increasing under sn<<s1<s0<s1<<sns_{-n}<…<s_{-1}<s_0<s_1<…<s_n.

Define the double-weight of vv by

dw(v,1)=(#{bars in v(1)},,#{bars in v(k)}),dw(v,1)=(\,\#\{\text{bars in }v^{(1)}\},\dots,\#\{\text{bars in }v^{(k)}\}),

dw(v,2)=(#{non-negative-index letters in v(1)},,#{non-negative-index letters in v(k)})dw(v,2)=(\,\#\{\text{non-negative-index letters in }v^{(1)}\},\dots,\#\{\text{non-negative-index letters in }v^{(k)}\})

where “bars” indicate generators sis_{-i} (i>0)(i>0). The double Stanley symmetric polynomial for ω\omega in variables x=(x1,,xk)x=(x_1,…,x_k) and y=(y1,,yk)y=(y_1,…,y_k) is

Fωd(x,y)=vRSIFk(ω)xdw(v,1)ydw(v,2).F^d_\omega(x,y) = \sum_{v\in RSIF_k(\omega)} x^{dw(v,1)} y^{dw(v,2)}.

Letting kk\to\infty yields the formal power series Fωd(x,y)Q[[x1,x2,...;y1,y2,...]]F^d_\omega(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{y}) \in \mathbb{Q}[[x_1, x_2, ...; y_1, y_2, ...]].

2. Specialization to Stanley Symmetric Functions

The double Stanley symmetric function encapsulates established symmetric functions as special cases. If ωAn\omega\in A_n, restricting to reduced increasing factorizations with no barred letters retrieves the type AA Stanley symmetric function FωA(x)F^A_\omega(\mathbf{x}). If ωCn+1\omega\in C_{n+1}, removing bar-signs and weighting each nonempty factor by $2$ gives the type CC symmetric function FωC(x)F^C_\omega(\mathbf{x}). This specialization is formalized: Fωd(0,x)=FωA(x),Fωd(x,x)=FωC(x)F^d_\omega(\mathbf{0}, \mathbf{x}) = F^A_\omega(\mathbf{x}), \qquad F^d_\omega(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{x}) = F^C_\omega(\mathbf{x}) for ωAnCn+1\omega\in A_n\subset C_{n+1} (Hawkes, 2018).

3. Primed Tableaux and Expansion Formulas

To connect reduced signed increasing factorizations to tableau combinatorics, intermediate generating functions are introduced via primed and barred entries in skew tableaux. For fixed μλ\mu\subset\lambda, kNk\in\mathbb{N}, vectors X,YZ0kX, Y \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}^k, and 0jk0\leq j\leq k, a primed-signed tableau TT of shape λ/μ\lambda/\mu is filled from

Xˉk={kˉ<<2ˉ<1ˉ<1<1<2<2<<k<k}\bar X_k' = \{ \bar k <\dots< \bar2 <\bar1 < 1' <1<2' <2< \cdots<k'<k \}

with rules enforcing weakly increasing order, limited markings per row and column, and prescribed barred/primed/unmarked counts. The double-weight (X,Y)(X, Y) associates powers in the generating function Rλ/μ(x,y)R_{\lambda/\mu}(x,y).

For ωAn\omega\in A_n, a mixed Edelman–Greene insertion yields a bijection between RSIFk(ω)\mathrm{RSIF}_k(\omega) and pairs (P,Q)(P,Q) with PP an Edelman–Greene tableau of shape sh(P)\operatorname{sh}(P) and QQ a primed tableau of matching shape. This leads to the expansion: Fωd(x,y)=PE(ω)Rsh(P)(x,y)F^d_\omega(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{y}) = \sum_{P \in E(\omega)} R_{\operatorname{sh}(P)}(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{y}) where E(ω)E(\omega) is the set of Edelman–Greene increasing tableaux whose row-reading word is a reduced word for ω\omega.

4. A Type A Bicrystal Structure and Schur Product Formulas

Primed tableaux possess an Ak1×Ak1A_{k−1}\times A_{k−1} “bicrystal” structure: crystal operators fi,eif_i, e_i handle unprimed letters, while fiˉ,eiˉf_{\bar i}, e_{\bar i} handle primed letters. These operators satisfy commuting relations and define a bicrystal. By bicrystal theory,

Fωd(x,y)=PE(ω)QPTk(sh(P)),Q highest-weight in both crystalssdw(Q,1)(x) sdw(Q,2)(y)F^d_\omega(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{y}) = \sum_{P\in E(\omega)} \sum_{Q\in PT_k(\operatorname{sh}(P)), Q \text{ highest-weight in both crystals}} s_{dw(Q,1)}(\mathbf{x})\ s_{dw(Q,2)}(\mathbf{y})

where sλ(x)s_\lambda(\mathbf{x}) and sλ(y)s_\lambda(\mathbf{y}) are Schur polynomials.

For ω=121A2\omega = 121 \in A_2, the corresponding expansion involves highest-weight primed tableaux of shape (2,1)(2,1), explicitly enumerating the case and yielding a summation over products of Schur functions in both alphabets.

5. Tableaux Conversions and Algebraic Relationships

Inward and outward conversion algorithms allow the translation between primed and signed tableaux. A local swap repeatedly replaces primed jj's with barred jj's or vice versa, establishing a bijection PST(λ/μ;X,Y;j)PST(λ/μ;X,Y;j1)PST(\lambda/\mu; X,Y; j) \leftrightarrow PST(\lambda/\mu; X,Y; j-1), weight-preserving. Specifically, primed tableaux PTk(λ/μ)PT_k(\lambda/\mu) correspond to signed tableaux STk(λ/μ)ST_k(\lambda/\mu), and

Rλ/μ(x,y)=TSTk(λ/μ)xdw(T,1)ydw(T,2)=sλ/μ(x/y)R_{\lambda/\mu}(x,y) = \sum_{T\in ST_k(\lambda/\mu)} x^{dw(T,1)} y^{dw(T,2)} = s_{\lambda/\mu}(\mathbf{x}/\mathbf{y})

i.e., the skew Schur function in the difference x/y\mathbf{x}/\mathbf{y}.

The algebraic relationships derived include

Fωd(x,y)=PE(ω)ssh(P)(x/y)=FωA(x/y),F^d_\omega(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{y}) = \sum_{P\in E(\omega)} s_{\operatorname{sh}(P)}(\mathbf{x}/\mathbf{y}) = F^A_\omega(\mathbf{x}/\mathbf{y}),

Fωd(0,x)=FωA(x),Fωd(x,x)=FωC(x),Fωd(x,y)=Fω1d(y,x)F^d_\omega(\mathbf{0}, \mathbf{x}) = F^A_\omega(\mathbf{x}), \quad F^d_\omega(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{x}) = F^C_\omega(\mathbf{x}), \quad F^d_\omega(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{y}) = F^d_{\omega^{-1}}(\mathbf{y}, \mathbf{x})

for ωAn\omega\in A_n.

6. Conjectural Extensions in Type CC

For general signed permutations in Cn+1C_{n+1}, “unknotted” elements are defined as those whose reduced words avoid certain forbidden patterns (s0s1s0s1s2s_0s_1s_0s_1\dots s_2 and sisi+1sisi+2s_is_{i+1}s_i\dots s_{i+2}). For unknotted ω\omega, analogs of EG-tableaux (signed Edelman–Greene tableaux) can be defined, and the following conjectures are proposed:

  • For unknotted ω\omega,

Fωd(x,x)=λEˉωλsλ(x).F^d_\omega(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{x}) = \sum_\lambda \bar E^\lambda_\omega\, s_\lambda(\mathbf{x}).

  • If in every reduced word for ω\omega, at most one s0s_0 occurs,

Fωd(x,x)=r evenλEˉωλ,rsλ(x)r oddλEˉωλ,rsλ(x)F^d_\omega(\mathbf{x}, -\mathbf{x}) = \sum_{r\text{ even}} \sum_\lambda \bar E^{\lambda,r}_\omega s_\lambda(\mathbf{x}) - \sum_{r\text{ odd}} \sum_\lambda \bar E^{\lambda,r}_\omega s_\lambda(\mathbf{x})

where Eˉωλ,r\bar E^{\lambda,r}_\omega counts signed EG-tableaux of shape λ\lambda with rr barred entries.

  • For ωAn\omega\in A_n (so no s0s_0 at all),

Fωd(x,tx)=r,λEˉωλ,rsλ(x)trF^d_\omega(\mathbf{x}, t\mathbf{x}) = \sum_{r,\lambda} \bar E^{\lambda,r}_\omega s_\lambda(\mathbf{x}) t^r

with verification for small unknotted ω\omega.

7. Context and Future Directions

The bumpless pipedreams constructions for double Stanley symmetric functions unify combinatorial models for type AA and type CC symmetric functions, crystal-theoretic perspectives, and Schur function expansions. The bicrystal structure and tableau expansions enable new algebraic relationships and conjectural ties to broader symmetric function families. Further research directions include establishing the conjectures for general type CC permutations, explicit realization of crystal operators on signed tableaux, and deeper connections to Schubert calculus and other representation-theoretic domains (Hawkes, 2018).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)

Whiteboard

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Bumpless Pipedreams.