Agentic Market Dynamics

• Agentic market dynamics are defined by autonomous, programmable agents that reduce communication frictions and enable personalized, frictionless transactions.
• They transform market architecture by shifting from centralized platforms to decentralized exchanges through unscripted and unrestricted agent interactions.
• They drive innovation in product bundling, micro-transactions, and data markets while redistributing power between open ecosystems and walled garden models.

Agentic market dynamics refers to the structural, behavioral, and welfare consequences arising from the deployment of autonomous, programmable agents—often underpinned by generative AI models—in economic markets where agents transact, negotiate, and coordinate on behalf of human users or businesses. The agentic paradigm centers on the ability for both consumers (via assistant agents) and businesses (via service agents) to interact programmatically, reducing communication frictions, reorganizing the architecture of markets, and enabling new product forms, value flows, and power distributions (Rothschild et al., 21 May 2025).

1. Foundations: Reducing Communication Frictions and Expanding the Possibility Set

Traditional market transactions are encumbered by significant communication frictions: consumers must articulate preferences, repeatedly input information, and navigate rigid interfaces; businesses must interpret incomplete signals and orchestrate extensive support structures. Agentic systems fundamentally alter this landscape by:

• Precisely translating consumer intent into structured, actionable forms.
• Programmatically sharing user data (with consent), minimizing onboarding and cognitive burdens.
• Automating negotiation, discovery, and transaction workflows between agent pairs, not limited to pre-specified forms or flows.

This transition manifests in a shift from a narrow, form-driven market to one with a highly expanded “possibility set,” where highly individualized, context-dependent interactions become feasible at scale. The paper encapsulates the fundamental agentic logic as: $$\text{Market friction} \downarrow \; \implies \; \text{Switching costs} \downarrow \; \implies \; \text{Decentralization} \uparrow$$

$$\text{Agentic communication} \to \text{Expansion of possibility set}$$

2. Market Architecture: From Platform Intermediation to Decentralized Exchanges

As agentic interactions lower communication costs, the established logic of digital market platforms is destabilized. In the platform-dominated model (e.g., Amazon, Expedia), centralization is justified by the value platforms provide in search, trust, remediation, and network logistics. Agentic technologies rewire these foundations:

• Direct agent-to-agent exchanges can bypass centralized matching, eroding platform lock-in and reducing intermediary rents.
• Reduced switching costs make it economically viable for consumers (or their agents) to shop across multiple providers fluidly.
• However, the persistence of various platform functions (trust/guarantee mechanisms, discovery algorithms) means that complete disintermediation is not assured; platform value propositions may evolve rather than disappear.

This shift is fundamentally dependent on adoption of both technical (protocol openness, agent interoperability) and market/governance standards (permission-less access, anti-restriction norms).

3. Power Redistribution: Openness vs. Walled Gardens

The architecture governing agent interactions—specifically, whether they are technically and institutionally open—instruments the redistribution of market power:

• Open ecosystems: Agents can transact freely across business/service boundaries. Power diffuses, user bargaining increases, and opportunities for new entrants arise.
• Walled gardens: Agents are confined within closed corporate platforms (analogous to app stores). Power concentrates with incumbents, limiting innovation and competition. Fragmentation and higher fees result, with risks of stifled user control and dampened societal benefit.

The crucial distinction between unscripted (flexible, protocol-based, not limited to fixed flows) and unrestricted (not prevented by platform rules) agentic interaction underpins these scenarios. Standardized protocols such as Microsoft AutoGen, Anthropic MCP, and Google Agent2Agent enable unscripted communication, but policy, business incentives, and market structure determine the degree of restriction.

4. Product and Market Innovations: Bundling, Micro-Transactions, and Data Markets

Agentic market dynamics catalyze novel product categories and economic mechanisms:

• Personalized dynamic bundling: Agents assemble bespoke packages of goods, services, or content on-the-fly, optimized for individual user history and context.
• Micro-transactions: Frictionless, agent-managed payments enable pricing models that are granular and usage-based (e.g., pay-per-snippet, feature unbundling/rebundling), previously impractical due to transaction cost barriers.
• Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) data markets: Content creators can expose data/services through agent-accessible interfaces, opening up new monetization and distribution avenues.

In open agentic webs, the scope for unbundling is especially pronounced, as agents can programmatically compose, recombine, or customize product offerings across the full spectrum of available sources.

5. Interaction Design: Unscripted and Unrestricted Exchanges

The efficiency gains and market restructuring potential of agentic dynamics rest critically on two axes (distinguished in the paper):

• Unscripted interactions (technical): Agents exchange information and execute transactions without being limited to predefined form-based workflows, enabled by advanced NLU/NLP and programmable protocols.
• Unrestricted interactions (institutional/ecosystem): Agents are permitted—by the platform or market— to communicate, transact, or negotiate with any other agent. Restrictions, if imposed, structurally limit the scope of agentic transformation.

The economic and societal impact is thus directly determined by both the technical capability to support unscripted exchanges, and the institutional will to enable unrestricted agentic commerce.

6. Competitive Dynamics: Discovery, Advertising, and the Preference Economy

As agentic competition reconfigures digital marketplaces:

• Discovery and advertising shift: The “attention economy” (scarcity of human attention) gives way to a “preference economy”—human feedback, expressed through agent preferences or reviews, becomes the central scarce resource.
• Algorithmic matching and agent-generated reviews supplant passive ad targeting, changing the economics of discovery and raising the salience of reputation/feedback mechanisms.
• Marketplaces for agentic endorsements and new discovery interfaces become core to economic value capture.

Markets can further fragment or concentrate depending on whether agent access to discovery and feedback is open or intermediated by a few large platforms.

7. Governance and Democratization Effects

The paper concludes that the architecture of agentic markets will ultimately determine the democratization (or concentration) of economic opportunity. An open web of agents:

• Reduces entry barriers for small businesses and new products/services.
• Empowers users and diversifies value capture.
• Fosters innovation by minimizing gatekeeping and enabling compositional creativity across agents and services.

Conversely, walled garden agentic models risk exacerbating market concentration, extracting higher fees, and entrenching incumbent power structures. Openness, interoperability, and commitment to standardization are posited as necessary preconditions for realizing the democratizing promise of agentic economies.

---

Table: Agentic Market Scenarios and Implications

Agentic Scenario	Structural Openness	Implications for Power and Innovation
Open Web of Agents	High	Decentralization, competition, user power
Agentic Walled Garden	Low	Centralization, high fees, slower innovation

---

Agentic market dynamics, as theorized, represent a structural reorganization of digital economies contingent on both advances in programmatic, natural language-based agent interaction and deliberate choices by ecosystem stakeholders regarding openness and governance. The extent to which agentic systems deliver on promises of efficiency, innovation, and democratized access is determined less by the technical possibility of agent-to-agent communication, and more by the institutional and strategic decisions about who is allowed to interact, on what terms, and in which architectures (Rothschild et al., 21 May 2025).