Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
130 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
10 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
3 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
55 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Agentic Web: Autonomous AI Agents

Updated 3 August 2025
  • Agentic Web is an emerging internet paradigm where autonomous AI agents leverage large language models for intelligent, multi-step task execution.
  • It employs standardized, semantic protocols like MCP and A2A for persistent agent-to-agent communication and decentralized discovery.
  • Economic mechanisms such as micropayments and an agent attention economy enable efficient value exchange and scalable multi-agent collaborations.

The Agentic Web is the emerging phase of the internet in which autonomous AI agents, powered primarily by LLMs, interact directly with web resources, other agents, and external APIs to plan, coordinate, and execute complex, multi-step tasks on behalf of users. This paradigm marks a transition from human-driven content navigation and interaction to machine-to-machine, goal-driven delegation, fundamentally reshaping digital workflows, economic structures, and the technical infrastructure of the web (Yang et al., 28 Jul 2025).

1. Framework and Defining Dimensions

The conceptual foundation of the Agentic Web is structured along three interdependent dimensions (Yang et al., 28 Jul 2025):

  • Intelligence: Agents possess cognitive capabilities extending beyond simple sequence modeling, encompassing contextualized reasoning, long-horizon planning, adaptive learning, memory architectures, and multimodal integration. This enables agents to act as proactive, self-reflective planners rather than reactive transducers.
  • Interaction: Communication in the Agentic Web leverages standardized, semantically enriched protocols tailored to agent needs—such as the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and Agent-to-Agent (A2A) messaging (Petrova et al., 14 Jul 2025). Persistent and stateful channels allow agents to negotiate, maintain context, and orchestrate multi-agent collaborations over extended dialogues.
  • Economics: Autonomous agents can exchange value directly, formalized via mechanisms such as micropayments (e.g., X42/H42 systems) (Balija et al., 10 Jul 2025), service meta-markets, and models like the emerging “Agent Attention Economy” (Yang et al., 28 Jul 2025), where tools and services compete for agent-driven traffic and compensation.

The table below summarizes these three key dimensions:

Dimension Core Attributes Example Technologies
Intelligence Reasoning, planning, memory, multimodality Retrieval-augmented LLMs, RL
Interaction Protocols, persistent comms, orchestration MCP, A2A, HTTP(S)-centric APIs
Economics Direct value exchange, service selection, markets X42 micropayments, attention economy

2. Historical Trajectory and Evolution

The Agentic Web has evolved through several distinct technological eras (Petrova et al., 14 Jul 2025):

  • Semantic Web / Multi-Agent Systems: Early visions focused on embedding explicit meaning (RDF/OWL), using platforms like JADE and languages like FIPA ACL and KQML for procedural communication and directory-enabled interactions.
  • LLM Emergence: Modern agentic architectures shifted the locus of intelligence from the data and platform layers into the agent’s own model weights—LLMs encode world knowledge, commonsense, and the capacity for dynamic reasoning internally.
  • Protocol Innovations: The limitations of rigid ontologies and heavyweight middleware spurred the development of lightweight, scalable agentic protocols—such as MCP for surfacing context, tools, and capabilities, and A2A for agent discovery and peer-to-peer (P2P) negotiation (Petrova et al., 14 Jul 2025, Yang et al., 28 Jul 2025).
  • Distributed and Decentralized Architectures: Recent blueprints like the Nanda Unified Architecture (Balija et al., 10 Jul 2025) implement distributed registries and decentralized trust mechanisms (via DIDs and verifiable credentials), overcoming fragmentation and enabling global agent discovery.

This progression reorients the “Web of Agents” around autonomy, composability, and open interoperability, rather than brittle central orchestration or strict schema adherence.

3. Core Architectural and Technical Challenges

Constructing a scalable, robust Agentic Web requires addressing several intertwined technical problems (Yang et al., 28 Jul 2025, Sharma et al., 25 May 2025):

  • Interoperability: Minimal, web-native standards are necessary to avoid agent ecosystem fragmentation. Reuse of HTTP(S), DNS, RESTful APIs, and structured JSON-based “interaction documents” facilitates cross-ecosystem messaging and coordination (Sharma et al., 25 May 2025).
  • Agent Discovery and Registration: DIDs and distributed registries allow for decentralized agent identification and location. Semantic agent cards provide machine-readable credentials and composability profiles (Balija et al., 10 Jul 2025).
  • Persistent State and Context Management: Standard session (cookie-based) and persistent (database-backed) state approaches underpin multi-turn, collaborative interactions in agent workflows.
  • Security and Trust Fabric: The MAESTRO security stack (Balija et al., 10 Jul 2025) and cryptographically verifiable credentials are leveraged to guarantee agent identity, behavioral attestation, policy compliance, and resilience to adversarial attacks (e.g., prompt injection, evidence manipulation) (Ming et al., 3 Jun 2025).
  • Agentic Web Interfaces (AWI): Purpose-built AWIs facilitate efficient, safe, and developer-friendly presentation of web resources to agents, overcoming the inefficiency of legacy human-oriented interfaces (DOMs, screenshots, or restricted APIs) (Lù et al., 12 Jun 2025).

A minimal but comprehensive interoperability architecture is illustrated in the table below:

Layer Mechanism/Standard
Messaging/Transport HTTP(S), DNS, REST APIs
Capability Description JSON Interaction Docs / Agent Cards
State Management Sessions (cookies), persistent DB
Discovery DID Registries, well-known URLs
Security/Trust Verifiable Credentials, Policy-as-Code

4. Economic and Infrastructural Systems

The economic layer of the Agentic Web is formalized through agent-native value exchange and governance models:

  • Micropayments and Markets: Lightweight, atomic payment systems (X42/H42) support transactional compensation for agent services, tasks, data sharing, and compute (Balija et al., 10 Jul 2025).
  • Agent Attention Economy: Agents, acting as autonomous economic participants, selectively allocate attention and API calls in response to service pricing, reliability, and utility, altering value flows relative to traditional human-centric ad models (Yang et al., 28 Jul 2025).
  • Decentralized Incentives and Governance: Integration of reputation networks, policy-as-code, and federated governance protocols (including DAOs or blockchain registries) ensures sybil-resistance, compliance, and adaptive rule enforcement at ecosystem scale (Balija et al., 10 Jul 2025, Petrova et al., 14 Jul 2025).

5. Agent Capabilities and Applications

The Agentic Web enables an array of advanced autonomous behaviors, including but not limited to (Yang et al., 28 Jul 2025, Zhang et al., 13 Oct 2024, Wu et al., 7 Feb 2025):

  • Retrieval and Deep Research: Agents conduct iterative, multi-step information seeking, combining real-time evidence retrieval, external tool use, and dynamic reasoning to synthesize complex answers (as in Deep Research frameworks and benchmarks like Mind2Web 2) (Gou et al., 26 Jun 2025, Zhang et al., 23 Jun 2025).
  • Planning and Orchestration: Agents decompose high-level intents into multi-stage workflows, invoking sequences of API calls, web navigation, and inter-agent collaboration (e.g., hierarchical architectures with planner-executor divisions or collaborative agent swarms) (Abuelsaad et al., 17 Jul 2024, Wu et al., 7 Feb 2025).
  • Economic Transaction and Negotiation: Autonomous agents negotiate service fees, contracts, and access rights, and execute purchases or bookings across distributed web services.
  • Multimodal Task Execution: Agents equipped with vision-language and code-generation modules interact with visual interfaces, process and transform images, and validate outcomes against dynamic feedback (e.g., Surfer-H powered by Holo1 VLMs) (Andreux et al., 3 Jun 2025, Liu et al., 20 May 2025).
  • Cross-Lingual and Domain Generalization: Multilingual benchmarks such as X-WebAgentBench expose both the capacity and limitations of LLM-based agents in handling non-English scenarios across diverse linguistic scenes (Wang et al., 21 May 2025).
  • Health, Engineering, and Science Domains: Foundation models augmented with live web search autonomously annotate structured biological data, automate engineering schematic design, and accelerate data-driven scientific discovery (Dajani et al., 14 Jun 2025, Srinivas et al., 8 Dec 2024).

6. Societal Risks, Governance, and Open Challenges

The deployment of agentic systems at scale introduces new risks and governance demands (Yang et al., 28 Jul 2025, Balija et al., 10 Jul 2025, Petrova et al., 14 Jul 2025, Floridi et al., 16 Apr 2025):

  • Security and Reliability: Expanded attack surfaces require formal verification, robust guardrails, adversarial training, and the use of quantum-resistant encryption and trustworthy attestation protocols to ensure both data and behavioral safety.
  • Economic and Social Equity: AAIO (Agentic AI Optimization) frameworks and standards must actively prevent the entrenchment of digital divides, algorithmic bias, and market concentration that disadvantage marginalized communities (Floridi et al., 16 Apr 2025).
  • Transparency and Accountability: The complexity of autonomous delegation and the potential for compounded errors or “hallucinations” in agentic feedback workflows create hazards in safety-critical domains, necessitating rigorous auditability, automated red-teaming, and human-in-the-loop oversight (Ming et al., 3 Jun 2025, Gou et al., 26 Jun 2025).
  • Governance and Regulatory Oversight: Open, federated governance involving industry consortia, standards bodies, and public regulators is needed to enforce compliance, privacy, and ethical alignment. Policy-as-code mechanisms, integrated with agent identity and behavioral data, serve as a technical substrate for such regulation.

7. Future Research Directions

Ongoing research is required in several focal areas to realize the full potential and mitigate the hazards of the Agentic Web (Yang et al., 28 Jul 2025, Petrova et al., 14 Jul 2025):

  • Advanced Reasoning and Memory: Improving the long-horizon, context-robust planning and memory capabilities of agentic models for complex, real-time orchestration.
  • Tool Use and Protocol Standardization: Refining interfaces, capability negotiation, and tool invocation protocols (MCP, A2A, AWI) for seamless interoperation and secure multi-agent workflows.
  • Trust, Identity, and Reputation: Deploying scalable systems for decentralized agent identification, verifiable attestation, and continuous behavioral trust modeling.
  • Economic Alignment: Researching new tokenomics, market models, and incentive structures that balance open participation with the emergence of high-quality, trustworthy agentic services.
  • Socio-Technical Coordination: Cross-disciplinary collaboration among computer scientists, economists, ethicists, and legal scholars is essential to address persistent questions of liability, transparency, and long-term governance as open agentic ecosystems mature (Petrova et al., 14 Jul 2025, Balija et al., 10 Jul 2025).

References

Key studies and benchmark repositories are curated at https://github.com/SafeRL-Lab/agentic-web (Yang et al., 28 Jul 2025), https://github.com/DavidZWZ/Awesome-Deep-Research (Zhang et al., 23 Jun 2025), and in the codebases of systems such as Agentic Reasoning (Wu et al., 7 Feb 2025) and Agent-E (Abuelsaad et al., 17 Jul 2024).


The Agentic Web thus represents an integrated, open, and dynamic environment where AI agents—endowed with advanced cognitive, communicative, and economic abilities—can collaboratively and autonomously fulfill complex user and organizational goals. Its realization demands innovations across technical protocols, economic infrastructure, security mechanisms, and governance regimes, with research and implementation progressing rapidly across academic, open-source, and industry settings.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (17)