Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Abell 2744-QSO1: Dust-Reddened High-z AGN

Updated 18 December 2025
  • Abell 2744-QSO1 is a dust-reddened, high-redshift AGN identified via triply-imaged strong lensing behind Abell 2744.
  • The JWST/NIRSpec spectrum reveals broad hydrogen emission lines and significant dust extinction, indicating rapid supermassive black hole growth.
  • Gravitational lensing analysis provides precise magnification factors and an unusually high black hole-to-host mass ratio, challenging local scaling relations.

Abell 2744-QSO1 is a highly magnified, dust-reddened, broad emission-line active galactic nucleus (AGN) at spectroscopic redshift zspec=7.0451±0.0005z_{\mathrm{spec}} = 7.0451 \pm 0.0005, identified through triply-imaged strong lensing by the foreground cluster Abell 2744. Deep JWST/NIRSpec observations confirm both its nature as an extremely red AGN and the physical association of the three images. The system is characterized by a notably high black hole-to-host stellar mass ratio, exceptionally broad emission lines, significant dust extinction, moderate Eddington ratio, high bolometric luminosity, and weak high-ionization metal lines. These properties collectively suggest Abell 2744-QSO1 is in a rapid supermassive black hole (SMBH) growth phase and may exemplify the evolutionary stage bridging massive black hole seeds and luminous high-redshift quasars (Furtak et al., 2023).

1. Discovery and Lensing Configuration

Abell 2744-QSO1 was first recognized as an unresolved, extremely red point source in the JWST/NIRCam UNCOVER survey behind the galaxy cluster Abell 2744 (z=0.308z = 0.308). Detected in three separate images (labeled A, B, C) in a classic lensing fold/arc configuration, the object’s photometric color (F277W–F444W = 2.63 ± 0.10) and image arrangement flagged it as a high-zz, highly reddened AGN candidate. Magnification factors, derived from an updated Zitrin-parametric strong lensing model fitted with 421 cluster galaxies and five cluster-scale DM halos, are μA=6.15[5.76,6.92]\mu_A = 6.15\,[5.76,\,6.92], μB=7.29[5.11,7.65]\mu_B = 7.29\,[5.11,\,7.65], and μC=3.55[3.31,3.80]\mu_C = 3.55\,[3.31,\,3.80] (95% confidence limits). The lensing model, utilizing MCMC minimization with 141 multiple-image constraints and RMS image-plane residual ΔRMS=0.51\Delta_{\mathrm{RMS}}=0.51'', achieves image positional accuracy of $0.5''$ per image (Furtak et al., 2023).

2. Spectroscopic Features and Dust Extinction

Stacked JWST/NIRSpec prism spectroscopy of all three images yields a demagnified depth equivalent to approximately 1700 hours on source. The combined spectrum is dominated by strong, broad Balmer and Lyman series hydrogen lines (Lyα\alpha, Hα\alpha, Hβ\beta, Hγ\gamma, Hδ\delta), alongside weaker metal features. Spectral fitting of the Balmer line centroids robustly places the redshift at zspec=7.0451±0.0005z_{\mathrm{spec}} = 7.0451 \pm 0.0005. The Balmer decrement Hα/Hβ=7.4±0.4H\alpha / H\beta = 7.4 \pm 0.4, far in excess of the Case B recombination value (2.86\sim2.86), and a Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) extinction law (RV=2.72R_V = 2.72), yield AV=3.0±0.5A_V = 3.0 \pm 0.5, A(Hβ)=3.1±0.5A(\mathrm{H}\beta) = 3.1 \pm 0.5, and A(Hα)=2.1±0.5A(\mathrm{H}\alpha) = 2.1 \pm 0.5. These extinction values are consistent with independent SED and photometric fits (Furtak et al., 2023).

3. Black Hole Mass Estimation

Line-of-sight velocity dispersion measurements utilize the intrinsic, LSF-corrected FWHM of the Hβ\beta line, 2800±250kms12800 \pm 250\,\mathrm{km\,s}^{-1}. Hα\alpha yields a commensurate FWHM despite partial detector edge coverage and blending. The black hole mass is derived using the single-epoch virial estimator (Greene & Ho 2005):

MBH=4.4×106(LHβ1042ergs1)0.56(FWHMHβ103kms1)2MM_{\mathrm{BH}} = 4.4 \times 10^6 \left( \frac{L_{H\beta}}{10^{42}\,\mathrm{erg\,s}^{-1}} \right)^{0.56} \left( \frac{\mathrm{FWHM}_{H\beta}}{10^3\,\mathrm{km\,s}^{-1}} \right)^2 M_\odot

and, equivalently, in continuum terms:

MBH=106.91(FWHMHβ103kms1)2(L51001044ergs1)0.5MM_{\mathrm{BH}} = 10^{6.91} \left( \frac{\mathrm{FWHM}_{H\beta}}{10^3\,\mathrm{km\,s}^{-1}} \right)^2 \left( \frac{L_{5100}}{10^{44}\,\mathrm{erg\,s}^{-1}} \right)^{0.5} M_\odot

Combining Hα\alpha and Hβ\beta estimates, the black hole mass is (41+2)×107M(4^{+2}_{-1}) \times 10^7 M_\odot, with additional 0.5\sim0.5 dex systematic uncertainty from the method (Furtak et al., 2023).

4. Host Galaxy Properties and Black Hole–to–Host Mass Ratio

All three lensed images remain point-source–like, despite strong lensing shear or magnification. A Sérsic fit to the highest-resolution F150W image yields an intrinsic half-light radius re<30r_e < 30 pc (95% upper limit). Adopting an upper stellar surface density Σ5×105Mpc2\Sigma_* \lesssim 5 \times 10^5\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-2}, the corresponding host stellar mass upper limit is M<1.4×109MM_* < 1.4 \times 10^9 M_\odot. Assuming the rest-UV emission is entirely stellar and constant star formation since z=12z = 12, M108.2MM_* \sim 10^{8.2} M_\odot is inferred.

Even with the most conservative host mass limit, the black hole–to–stellar mass ratio is MBH/M3%M_{\mathrm{BH}} / M_* \gtrsim 3\% and may plausibly reach unity (100%\sim100\%) for lighter hosts. This far exceeds the local universe average, MBH/M0.1%M_{\mathrm{BH}} / M_* \sim 0.1\% (Bennert et al. 2011; Reines & Volonteri 2015), with Abell 2744-QSO1 therefore lying 30\sim30–100×\times above low-zz scaling relations (Furtak et al., 2023).

5. Luminosity, Accretion, and Metallicity

Correcting Balmer-line luminosities for extinction and lensing and applying a bolometric correction kbol=10±2k_{\mathrm{bol}} = 10 \pm 2 yields Lbol=(1.1±0.3)×1045 ergs1L_{\mathrm{bol}} = (1.1 \pm 0.3) \times 10^{45}~\mathrm{erg\,s}^{-1}. A consistency check from dereddened L5100L_{5100} provides a comparable value. The Eddington luminosity for MBH=4×107 MM_{\mathrm{BH}} = 4 \times 10^7~M_\odot is LEdd5×1045L_{\mathrm{Edd}} \simeq 5 \times 10^{45} erg s1^{-1}, so the Eddington ratio λEdd=Lbol/LEdd0.3\lambda_{\mathrm{Edd}} = L_{\mathrm{bol}}/L_{\mathrm{Edd}} \simeq 0.3, implying an accretion rate M˙0.1Myr1\dot{M} \gtrsim 0.1\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1} for η0.1\eta \sim 0.1.

The spectrum is marked by exceptionally weak or undetected high-ionization metal lines (C iv, C iii], Mg ii, [O iii]) relative to hydrogen. Deep Chandra non-detection (LX,40keV<3×1043L_{X,40\,\mathrm{keV}}<3\times10^{43} erg s1^{-1}) suggests either subsolar metallicity in the broad-line region or heavy dust obscuration, analogous to local super-Eddington, X-ray–weak quasars (Furtak et al., 2023).

6. Cosmological Implications and Evolutionary Context

The spectral features—broad hydrogen recombination lines, high AVA_V dust extinction, moderate LbolL_{\mathrm{bol}}, UV faintness, and substantial Eddington fraction—indicate a dusty, rapidly accreting SMBH in a possible “blow-out” phase. With MBHfew107MM_{\mathrm{BH}} \sim \mathrm{few}\,10^7 M_\odot at z7z\simeq 7 and a number density of ϕ=(7.3±1.7)×105Mpc3mag1\phi = (7.3 \pm 1.7) \times 10^{-5}\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-3}\,\mathrm{mag}^{-1}, Abell 2744-QSO1 and analogous “red-dot” objects are 100\sim100 times more numerous than the faintest UV-selected AGN at z>7z>7. This suggests these sources may plausibly bridge the gap between 102\sim10^2103M10^3 M_\odot black hole seeds and the formation of the earliest luminous (10910^91010M10^{10} M_\odot) quasar population at comparable epochs (Furtak et al., 2023).

7. Uncertainties and Methodological Considerations

Systematic uncertainties in the lensing magnification (μ\mu) remain at 10\sim10–20% due to mass modeling assumptions, mass-sheet degeneracy, and line-of-sight projection effects, even with RMS reproduction at $0.51''$ across 141 multiple images. The intrinsic HβH\beta FWHM uncertainty (±250 km s1^{-1}) introduces 20%\sim20\% uncertainty in MBHM_{\mathrm{BH}}; single-epoch virial mass calibration further adds 0.5\sim0.5 dex systematic error. The extinction law and bolometric correction (kbolk_{\mathrm{bol}}) each contribute 20%\sim20\% error in LbolL_{\mathrm{bol}} and λEdd\lambda_{\mathrm{Edd}}; flatter attenuation curves would increase both AVA_V and derived luminosities. The stellar mass upper limit assumes extreme stellar densities; an extended, low-surface-brightness stellar component missed by point-source analysis could lower the derived MBH/MM_{\mathrm{BH}}/M_*. Abell 2744-QSO1 therefore imposes stringent observational constraints on models of early black hole–galaxy coevolution, favoring rapid SMBH growth or atypical seed formation efficiency during the first 750\sim750 Myr after the Big Bang (Furtak et al., 2023).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)

Whiteboard

Topic to Video (Beta)

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Abell 2744-QSO1.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube