Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 97 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 36 tok/s
GPT-5 High 34 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 91 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 217 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

3-Algebras: Ternary Algebraic Structures

Updated 29 August 2025
  • 3-Algebras are nonassociative algebraic structures with a trilinear product that generalizes Lie algebras via a totally skew-symmetric bracket and the Filippov identity.
  • They include variants such as 3-Leibniz, Cartan–Weyl, and semi-associative 3-algebras, each relaxing traditional symmetry or associativity conditions.
  • Applications span gauge theory, quantum field theory, and noncommutative geometry, underpinning models like BLG theory and M-brane dynamics.

A 3-algebra is a nonassociative algebraic structure equipped with a trilinear product (ternary operation), generalizing the familiar concept of a Lie algebra to the field of higher-arity operations. In the most prominent case, a 3-Lie algebra, the trilinear bracket is totally skew-symmetric and obeys a "fundamental identity" that controls its natural interaction with itself, serving as a direct generalization of the Jacobi identity. 3-algebras underpin a vast landscape of algebraic structures, including Filippov (n-Lie) algebras, 3-Leibniz algebras, Cartan–Weyl 3-algebras, semi-associative 3-algebras, and operators such as twisted Rota–Baxter operators, with applications spanning algebraic geometry, representation theory, mathematical physics, and quantum field theory.

1. Core Definition and Algebraic Structures

The archetypal 3-algebra is the 3-Lie algebra, formally defined on a vector space VV by a bracket product [,,]:V3V[\cdot,\cdot,\cdot] : V^{\otimes 3} \to V that is:

  • Totally skew-symmetric: [x1,x2,x3][x_1, x_2, x_3] changes sign under any transposition of its arguments.
  • Satisfies the Filippov (fundamental) identity:

[x1,x2,[y1,y2,y3]]=[[x1,x2,y1],y2,y3]+[y1,[x1,x2,y2],y3]+[y1,y2,[x1,x2,y3]].[x_1, x_2, [y_1, y_2, y_3]] = [[x_1, x_2, y_1], y_2, y_3] + [y_1, [x_1, x_2, y_2], y_3] + [y_1, y_2, [x_1, x_2, y_3]].

The definition can be extended by relaxing skew-symmetry or the structure of the bracket, giving rise to generalized structures such as 3-Leibniz algebras (which drop total skew-symmetry) and semi-associative 3-algebras (which weaken associativity conditions but retain partial antisymmetry in selected arguments) (Bai et al., 2019, Teng et al., 2023).

Many constructions and classifications of 3-algebras leverage familiar binary structures such as associative commutative algebras, Lie algebras, group algebras, and derivations, but 3-algebras exhibit properties not reducible to binary algebras in general (Ahmed et al., 2021). For example, not every ternary multiplication admits a description in terms of iterated binary multiplications.

2. Cartan–Weyl and Generalized Cartan–Weyl 3-Algebras

Cartan–Weyl 3-algebras are a direct analog of the Cartan–Weyl basis for semisimple Lie algebras. Such 3-algebras possess:

  • A Cartan subalgebra H\mathcal{H} of mutually commuting generators HIH_I, with [HI,HJ,HK]=0[H_I, H_J, H_K] = 0;
  • Step generators EαE^\alpha labeled by two-form roots αIJ\alpha_{IJ}, satisfying [HI,HJ,Eα]=αIJEα[H_I, H_J, E^\alpha] = \alpha_{IJ} E^\alpha;
  • Nondegenerate invariant metric with HI,HJ=gIJ\langle H_I, H_J\rangle = g_{IJ} invertible and Eα,Eβδα+β,0\langle E^\alpha, E^\beta\rangle \propto \delta_{\alpha+\beta,0};
  • Further structure in the 3-brackets, where mixed brackets close either on the Cartan subalgebra or reproduce new step generators, and closure is controlled by factorization of roots into wedge products of a fixed null one-form and root one-forms of an underlying semisimple Lie algebra (Chu, 2010).

Classification is achieved by analyzing the signature (“index”) of the invariant metric:

  • Index 0: allows only a single pair of step generators (degenerately decomposable 3-algebra).
  • Index 1 (Lorentzian case): aligns with 3-algebras relevant for the BLG theory (see below), decomposing as gC(u,v)\mathfrak{g}\oplus\mathbb{C}(u,v), where the “light-cone” u,vu,v correspond to null directions.
  • Index ≥2: the algebra splits into semisimple, light-cone, and additional step generator sectors, with elaborate interplay among brackets (Chu, 2010).

Generalized Cartan–Weyl 3-algebras relax the requirement that the Cartan subalgebra be abelian, allowing [HI,HJ,HK]0[H_I, H_J, H_K] \ne 0 (encoded via nontrivial structure constants LIJKML_{IJK}{}^M) (Chu, 2010). These generalizations are critical in providing algebraic settings suitable for incorporating fuzzy S3S^3 solutions within the BLG theory, as traditional Cartan–Weyl 3-algebras (with abelian Cartan) do not support such embeddings.

3. 3-Algebras in Gauge Theory and Quantum Field Theory

The BLG (Bagger–Lambert–Gustavsson) theory for multiple M2-branes demands a metric 3-Lie algebra structure for the gauge symmetry (Chu, 2010, Chu, 2010). In this context:

  • The 3-algebra must be metric (possess a nondegenerate invariant inner product) for a ghost-free action.
  • A notion of strong-semisimplicity is imposed, requiring the existence of a semisimple Lie algebra upon “reduction” by fixing (n–2) Cartan elements, i.e., [x,y]h:=[x,y,h][x, y]_h := [x, y, h] must be semisimple as a Lie algebra bracket (Chu, 2010).
  • Many traditional 3-algebras (including Lorentzian 3-algebras) are special cases of Cartan–Weyl 3-algebras (Chu, 2010).
  • The inability to accommodate a fuzzy S3S^3 solution (key for describing polarized M2–M5 bound states) in the BLG theory with abelian Cartan–Weyl 3-algebras motivates the introduction of generalized Cartan–Weyl 3-algebras with nonabelian Cartan sectors (Chu, 2010).

Metric Lie 3-algebras also appear in nonabelian formulations of higher-dimensional tensor multiplets, such as the (2,0) six-dimensional tensor multiplet, where the nonabelian system can be reduced to five-dimensional super-Yang–Mills theory and free six-dimensional abelian (2,0) multiplets, directly implicating D4 and M5-brane physics (Lambert et al., 2010).

4. Variants and Higher-Categorical Generalizations

At the categorical and homotopical level, 3-Lie_\infty-algebras and 3-Lie 2-algebras provide coherent structures encoding higher homotopies and categorification, respectively. A 3-Lie_\infty-algebra comprises a graded vector space with a series of higher ($2n+1$)-ary operations l2n+1l_{2n+1} satisfying a hierarchy of homotopy-encoded identities (Zhou et al., 2015). Such structures equate, at the 2-category level, to 2-term 3-Lie_\infty-algebras and 3-Lie 2-algebras, with equivalence established via explicit 2-functorial construction.

Skeletal and strict 3-Lie 2-algebras admit classification via cohomology (quadrupoles incorporating a 3-cocycle for skeletal; crossed modules for strict structures) (Zhou et al., 2015).

Operadic “weak Lie 3-algebras” extend the L_\infty approach and permit skeletal/strict truncations and homotopy transfer (Dehling, 2017), furnishing bridges to applications in n-plectic geometry and higher Courant algebroids.

5. Explicit Constructions and Examples

A variety of algebraic recipes exist for producing 3-algebras:

  • From commutative associative algebras with derivations and involutions: via formulas such as [a,b,c]=f(a)[b,c]+f(b)[c,a]+f(c)[a,b][a, b, c] = f(a)[b,c] + f(b)[c,a] + f(c)[a,b] where [a,b][a,b] is constructed via an involution and derivation (Bai et al., 2013).
  • Group algebra constructions: For an abelian group GG and homomorphism a:GF+a:G\to \mathbb{F}_+, the group algebra F[G]F[G] admits a bracket [eg,eh,eq][e^g, e^h, e^q] determined by natural differences and group multiplication (Bai et al., 2013).
  • From Laurent polynomial algebras using suitable involutions and derivations (infinite-dimensional simple examples; see formulas in (Bai et al., 2013)).
  • From binary algebras: recursive constructions generate n-ary brackets, but the resulting multiplication may not, in general, be reducible to a binary operation, and non-isomorphic binary algebras may map to isomorphic 3-algebras (Ahmed et al., 2021).
  • Semi-associative 3-algebras, with trilinear products skew in their first two arguments and satisfying particular “semi-associative” and mixed-symmetry identities; their “adjacent” algebra yields a true 3-Lie bracket by full antisymmetrization (Bai et al., 2019).
  • Trigroups, with three compatible associative binary operations and bar-units/inverses, generate pointed 3-racks via a ternary conjugation product, and differentiation at the identity in Lie trigroups produces Leibniz 3-algebra structures (Biyogmam et al., 2019).

6. 3-Algebras in Geometric and Physical Models

3-algebras are deeply embedded in models of noncommutative geometry, quantum gravity, and string/M-theory:

  • Tensor models for quantum gravity employ real, cyclically symmetric rank-three tensors as dynamical variables; induced 3-ary operations represent symmetries more naturally than binary commutators. In the fuzzy space interpretation, the resulting 3-ary coordinate algebras recover Lie triple systems whose associated Lie algebras coincide with those underlying Snyder’s noncommutative spacetime (Sasakura, 2011).
  • Cartan–Weyl and generalized Cartan–Weyl 3-algebras serve as the algebraic foundation for the BLG theory of multiple M2-branes, with strict algebraic constraints dictating what physical configurations (e.g., fuzzy S3S^3) are dynamically allowed (Chu, 2010, Chu, 2010).
  • In nonabelian (2,0) tensor multiplet theories, 3-algebraic structures with antisymmetric structure constants satisfying the fundamental identity organize the interactions, and appropriate reductions yield D-brane and, via null reductions, M5-brane systems (Lambert et al., 2010).

7. Operator and Deformation Theory; Cohomology and Extensions

The operator theory of 3-algebras has evolved to incorporate twisted Rota–Baxter, OO–operators, and Reynolds operators appropriate to the ternary setting. These notions generate new 3-algebra structures on module spaces (notably, NS–3–Lie algebras), and their deformation theory is governed by generalized Chevalley–Eilenberg cohomology. For instance, infinitesimal and formal deformations of twisted OO–operators are controlled by the first and second cohomology of the associated induced 3-Lie algebra representation (Chtioui et al., 2021, Hou et al., 2021).

Cohomological techniques extend to geometric settings, as in 3-Hom-Lie-Rinehart algebras and their A-split abelian extensions, with cohomology groups classifying extensions and deformations (Guo et al., 2019, Bai et al., 2019).

Table: Selected Classes of 3-Algebras and Key Features

Structure Defining Feature Applications/Context
3-Lie algebra Skew-symmetric, fundamental identity M2-brane models, n-plectic geometry
Cartan–Weyl 3-algebra Root/step decomposition, abelian Cartan, metric, factorization of roots BLG theory, symmetry classification
Generalized Cartan–Weyl Nonabelian Cartan subalgebra, metric, strong-semisimplicity via reduction Fuzzy S3^3 in BLG, extended symmetry
Semi-associative 3-algebra Semi-associativity, partial antisymmetry Double module/extension theory
3-Leibniz algebra Ternary bracket, Leibniz-type identity (not fully antisymmetric) Extensions of Filippov theory
3-Lie_\infty/3-Lie 2-alg. Coherent higher homotopies / categorification n-plectic geometry, higher gauge
3-Lie-Rinehart algebra 3-Lie structure + module/anchor over commutative algebra Lie algebroid generalization
NS–3–Lie / 3-NS-Lie algebra Splitting into two ternary operations compatible with 3-Lie bracket Operator/deformation theory
3-post-Lie algebra 3-Lie structure plus a compatible ternary operation Rota–Baxter theory, deformation
Trigroup (Lie 3-rack) Three associative binary operations with bar-units/inverses Leibniz 3-algebra via differentiation

References

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube