Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

The Restricted Inverse Optimal Value Problem on Shortest Path under l∞l_\infty Norm on Trees

Published 16 Oct 2026 in math.OC | (2610.23710v1)

Abstract: We study the restricted inverse optimal value problem on shortest paths under the weighted l∞l_\infty norm on trees (RIOVSPT<em>∞<em>\infty): adjust edge weights at minimum worst-link cost so that the shortest root--leaf path is lower-bounded by a given value DD, a restriction on a prescribed path P0P_0. Unlike the l1l_1 version minimizing total adjustment cost, the l</em>∞l</em>\infty objective controls the worst link, the criterion relevant in bandwidth pricing. We characterize feasibility through the minimum cost shortest path interdiction problem (MCSPIT<em>∞<em>\infty), whose optimal solution w^\hat w splits the instance at the first edge of P0P_0 into two independent subproblems. Relative to w^\hat w, three cases arise. The first two admit closed-form optimal solutions. The third reduces to a parametric subproblem SPIT<sup>0</sup></em>∞(M)<sup>0</sup></em>\infty(M): minimize the length of P0P_0 on the gate subtree under the budget C(w^)+MC(\hat w)+M with all other root--leaf paths kept at least DD. It is solved exactly by an iterative greedy procedure. On its value function V(M)V(M), the predicate V(M)≤DV(M)\leq D is equivalent to the nonnegativity of truncated-bound margins, which are monotone, continuous and piecewise affine; the smallest such MM gives the optimal value, located by binary search over the edge-bound breakpoints with an exact affine threshold evaluation. The same margin test on the full tree gives a uniform algorithm for all cases. Both algorithms run in O(nlog⁡n)O(n\log n) time. Experiments on synthetic trees agree with a linear programming baseline and illustrate the two algorithms' distinct runtime profiles.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.