Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Online geometric matching and segments block points

Published 16 Oct 2026 in cs.DS and cs.CG | (2610.23130v1)

Abstract: Given a sequence of online points in general position in the plane, the geometric matching problem asks to match as many points as possible, subject to segment crossing constraints. We initiate the study of online geometric matching with limited crosses. In the kk-crossing model each matched segment is allowed to have at most kk crosses, where k=0k=0 corresponds to the online noncrossing matching model for which Bose et al. proved that Greedy is an optimal deterministic algorithm achieving a competitive ratio of $2/3$. In the triangle-free-crossing model no three matched segments are allowed to pairwise cross each other. Interestingly, we show in both cases the performance of Greedy does not improve by allowing crosses, and in fact, becomes worse in the kk-crossing setting for k≥1k\ge 1. In the triangle-free-crossing model, we propose a simple two-layer-Greedy deterministic algorithm achieving a competitive ratio $4/5$. More interestingly, we propose and study the underlying segments blocking points extremal problem, and discuss its connection to vertex cover numbers and Ramsey numbers, with interesting open problems that might be of independent interest. We revisit the noncrossing model. We give a randomized algorithm which is an asymmetric version of Kamali et al., improving the competitive ratio from $0.66952$ to $0.67034$. We also show, via a conceptually simple construction, that no randomized algorithm can match more than $6/7$ fraction of points, improving the previous $16/17$ by Boyar et al.

Authors (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.