Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Star-Ordered Rotor Loops in Clifford Algebras

Published 15 Oct 2026 in math.RA and math.CO | (2610.21593v1)

Abstract: We consider, in a real Clifford algebra, a family of unit bivectors Bi=CSiB_i = C S_i formed from k+1k+1 pairwise anticommuting generators C,S1,…,SkC, S_1, \ldots, S_k with square −1-1; we call this a \emph{star family} with \emph{central generator} CC and \emph{leaf generators} SiS_i. For the associated rotors Ui(θ<em>i)=cos⁡θi2+Bisin⁡θi2U_i(θ<em>i) = \cos\frac{θ_i}{2} + B_i \sin\frac{θ_i}{2} we study two objects: the ordered chain Pk=U1⋯UkP_k = U_1 \cdots U_k and the \emph{star-ordered rotor loop} Θk=Pk QkΘ_k = P_k \, Q_k with the \emph{same-order reversion product} Qk=U~1⋯U~kQ_k = \widetilde U_1 \cdots \widetilde U_k, as opposed to the trivially reversed order, for which U1⋯UkU~k⋯U~1=1U_1 \cdots U_k \widetilde U_k \cdots \widetilde U_1 = 1. The scalar part of ΘkΘ_k measures the \emph{order defect} of the family. We prove two theorems. First, the scalar part of the chain factorises, ⟨Pk⟩0=∏</em>i=1<sup>k</sup>cos⁡θi2\langle P_k \rangle_0 = \prod</em>{i=1}<sup>k</sup> \cos\frac{θ_i}{2}; this requires the star structure, and we give a counterexample. Second, we derive a closed expression for ⟨Θk⟩0\langle Θ_k \rangle_0, valid for every kk, whose coefficients obey a \emph{period-four sign law} η(m)=(−1)<sup>⌊</sup>m/2⌋η(m) = (-1)<sup>{\lfloor</sup> m/2 \rfloor} and which admits the compact form ⟨Θk⟩0=Re⁡![(1−i)∏i(cos⁡<sup>2θi2</sup>+isin⁡<sup>2θi2)]\langle Θ_k \rangle_0 = \operatorname{Re}!\big[(1-\mathrm{i}) \prod_i (\cos<sup>2\frac{θ_i}{2}</sup> + \mathrm{i}\sin<sup>2\frac{θ_i}{2})\big], holding for every pairwise anticommuting unit family without further hypothesis. From the compact form we obtain a polar form, a complete zero criterion, a lacunary coefficient rule, and a proof of non-separability for k≥2k \geq 2. Two supplementary theorems extend the result to arbitrary permutations of the index order and to families with mixed squares Bi<sup>2</sup>∈−1,+1B_i<sup>2</sup> \in {-1, +1}. All proofs use only anticommutation, reversion and the symmetry of the scalar form; no physical interpretation is assumed or claimed.

Authors (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.