Selecting the 7th Smallest of 16 Elements Takes Exactly 28 Comparisons

Abstract: Let $V_i(n)$ denote the minimum worst-case number of comparisons needed to find the $i$-th smallest of $n$ distinct elements. We construct algorithms showing $V_7(16)\le28$ and $V_8(16)\le29$, improving the previously reported upper bounds of 30 and 31. Together with known lower bounds, these results establish $V_7(16)=28$ and leave $V_8(16)\in{28,29}$. For 17 elements, we establish $V_5(17)=27$ and improve the upper bounds for ranks 6 through 9 to 29, 30, 31, and 31, respectively. Every new upper bound has an explicit decision-graph certificate verified by a static checker developed independently of the search. We also derive a lower bound for selection from a partially ordered state by combining the Fussenegger-Gabow weight with its order-reversed counterpart. All new upper bounds and this lower bound are formally verified in Lean 4. For $V_8(16)$, we show that a lower bound based solely on the total number of decision-tree leaves cannot establish $V_8(16)\ge29$. The algorithms were found using fixed-budget search, information-guided comparison ordering, and proof-number search. Proof-number search was decisive in finding the 28-comparison algorithm; in our experiments, refuting a comparison budget remained substantially more expensive than finding an algorithm within it.