Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Finite-on-Top-of-Temporal CSPs in Fixed-Point Logic

Published 13 Oct 2026 in cs.LO and math.LO | (2610.18287v1)

Abstract: We study definability in fixed-point logic with counting (FPC) for a class of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) that simultaneously generalises finite-domain CSPs and temporal CSPs. The templates for the CSPs are first-order expansions of the structure $([k] \times {\mathbb Q};&lt;_1,\dots,&lt;_k,\sim)$ where $&lt;_i \, := {((i,x),(i,x&#39;)) \mid x&lt;x&#39;}$ and $\sim \, := {((i,x),(i,x&#39;)) \mid i \in [k], x,x&#39; \in {\mathbb Q}}$, i.e., kk copies of $({\mathbb Q};&lt;)$. Such a CSP is definable in FPC precisely when the template pp-constructs neither the ternary temporal relation XX, which holds on three elements if the minimum is attained exactly twice, nor a nontrivial finite affine structure. Equivalently, the template has global polymorphisms that witness the tractability of the temporal CSPs on the copies, and that provide 3-4 weak near-unanimity operations on the set of copies of Q{\mathbb Q}. In this case, we prove that the CSP is even expressible in the less expressive logic FP<sup>∗<sup>*, which is the restriction of FPC without counting terms (i.e., the extension of first-order logic by a fixed point operator and an ordered auxiliary number sort). Our algorithm samples finitely many values in each copy and then performs nested constraint-singleton consistency tests (which is a uniform polynomial-time algorithm for finite-domain CSPs). The correctness proof uses finite-domain CSP theory to combine consistency certificates by a single polymorphism term, fixing each variable to one copy without destroying the certificates needed for the temporal algorithm. We then use a known normal form for algebraic products to control the remaining interactions between different copies.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.