Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Systematic Uncertainties in Ultralight Boson Constraints from Superradiance

Published 8 Oct 2026 in hep-ph and astro-ph.HE | (2610.11091v1)

Abstract: Ultralight bosons are well-motivated candidates for physics beyond the Standard Model and may constitute part or all of the dark matter. Black-hole superradiance provides a powerful means of probing these particles through their gravitational interaction with rotating black holes. This mechanism has motivated a growing body of constraints from electromagnetic measurements of black-hole spins and, more recently, gravitational-wave observations. Gravitational-wave probes draw on several distinct signatures: the spins of merging binary black holes, gravitational radiation emitted by boson clouds, and potential imprints of cloud-induced changes to binary dynamics. The interpretation of these probes depends on method-specific astrophysical and theoretical assumptions, including black hole formation, natal spin, age, accretion history, population priors, and boson self-interactions. In this paper, we review the principal electromagnetic and gravitational-wave constraints derived from black-hole superradiance, with particular emphasis on their underlying assumptions and systematic uncertainties. The distinct observational signatures and systematic uncertainties of these approaches offer complementary perspectives on the viability of ultralight-boson models. In particular, their overlapping coverage around boson masses of 10<sup>−1310<sup>{-13}-10<sup>−1210<sup>{-12} eV makes this region particularly informative for comparing constraints, with attention to the assumptions underlying each result.

Authors (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.