Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

From Demailly's Inequality to Harbourne--Huneke Containments for General Points

Published 6 Oct 2026 in math.AC and math.AG | (2610.08335v1)

Abstract: Let II be the defining ideal of a general set of ss points in projective NN-space over an algebraically closed field. Harbourne and Huneke conjectured the strengthened symbolic containment I<sup>(Nr)⊆</sup>m<sup>r(N−1)I<sup>r</sup></sup> I<sup>{(Nr)}\subseteq</sup> \mathfrak{m}<sup>{r(N-1)}I<sup>r</sup></sup> for every r≥1r\ge 1. For general points this was known in low dimension and for small numbers of points, while in arbitrary dimension and arbitrary cardinality the best general result was the stable version, valid on one dense Zariski-open set for all sufficiently large rr. We show that the recent proof of Demailly's conjecture for arbitrary finite point sets by Hà and Sivakumar removes the stability threshold. The key observation is that the strict generic Waldschmidt estimate of Bisui and Nguyen allows one to select a single finite symbolic level m0m_0. Equality of the corresponding interpolation number is a Zariski-open condition. Demailly's inequality then propagates this one finite condition to lower bounds for every symbolic power, and a standard regularity criterion converts those bounds into the Harbourne--Huneke containment for every rr. Consequently, for every N≥2N\ge2 and every s≥1s\ge1, one dense Zariski-open family of ss-point configurations in P<sup>N\mathbb{P}<sup>N satisfies the Harbourne--Huneke containment simultaneously for all r≥1r\ge 1. The argument also clarifies a quantifier issue in the earlier literature: before the full Demailly theorem, estimates on the generic fibre naturally yielded either all rr on a very general set, or one open set only for r≫0r\gg 0. The new theorem replaces infinitely many symbolic conditions by a single finite interpolation condition.

Authors (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.