Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Polynomial-time classical and quantum simulation of quantum impurity models

Published 1 Oct 2026 in quant-ph, cond-mat.str-el, cs.CC, cs.DS, and physics.chem-ph | (2610.02167v1)

Abstract: Quantum impurity models are paradigmatic models of interacting quantum matter, as well as key computational primitives for modern electronic-structure methods. They describe a small subsystem of interacting fermions coupled to a large, noninteracting bath. We perform a comprehensive study of the computational complexity of simulating impurity models, delineating the boundary between classical and quantum tractability for this class of problems. Our main finding is that static properties of quantum impurity models can be calculated efficiently on a classical computer. Specifically, we give classical algorithms that (1) estimate the ground-state energy to additive precision δδ in time poly(n,δ<sup>−1)\mathrm{poly}(n,δ<sup>{-1}), and (2) estimate the partition function at inverse temperature ββ to relative precision δδ in time poly(n,β,δ<sup>−1)\mathrm{poly}(n,β,δ<sup>{-1}), where nn is the system size. These results improve the previous best-known complexity for ground-state energy estimation from quasipolynomial to polynomial time, while establishing for the first time rigorous polynomial-time guarantees for simulating impurity models in thermal equilibrium. On the other hand, we find that simulating dynamical properties of impurity models is hard for classical computers but easy on a quantum computer. As a canonical example, we show that computing their nonequilibrium Green's functions captures the full power of quantum computation, even at finite temperature. Taken together, our results rule out superpolynomial quantum speedups for computing static properties, but provide an avenue for quantum advantage in simulating impurity physics out of equilibrium.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 68 likes about this paper.