Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Complexity study of the Hartle-Hawking state in JT gravity

Published 1 Oct 2026 in hep-th, gr-qc, and quant-ph | (2610.00844v1)

Abstract: The negativity of the Wigner function gives an operationally meaningful measure of the complexity of simulating a quantum state on a classical computer. We study its growth for the Hartle-Hawking state under time evolution in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, in the length basis. At the disk level, and to leading order in the semiclassical parameter ββ, the Hartle-Hawking state is a minimum-uncertainty Gaussian wavepacket at rest at the turning point of the Liouville wall, centred at x=2log⁡(2β/π)x=2\log(2β/π) with ⟨p<sup>2⟩=π<sup>2/8β\langle p<sup>2\rangle=π<sup>2/8β. Its Wigner function is positive, so its negativity is $1+o(1)$ for all sub-exponential times; it is even in tt by time-reversal symmetry, and exactly frozen once the reflected packet decouples from the wall, because free evolution is a Clifford shear. At late times the negativity saturates close to its upper bound, at 2/πdeff(β)\sqrt{2/π}\sqrt{d_{\rm eff}(β)} with deff(β)=Z(β)<sup>2/Z(2β)d_{\rm eff}(β)=Z(β)<sup>2/Z(2β), a value that requires the discrete spectrum. Unlike the spectral form factor, the negativity displays no ramp: the two-boundary wormhole contribution is suppressed by e<sup>−2S0e<sup>{-2S_0} relative to a disk term that, unlike that of the spectral form factor, does not decay. The exact survival amplitude Z(β+it)/Z(β)Z(β+it)/Z(β) gives the spread complexity growing as σE<sup>2t<sup>2σ_E<sup>2t<sup>2, and the seed-normalised negativity is, at the disk level, the inverse of the exact survival probability. We take this as evidence that the length basis is ideally suited for a dual, semi-classical effective description of chaotic quantum dynamics for large e<sup>S0e<sup>{S_0} at sub-exponential times.

Authors (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.