Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Verifiable Quantum Advantage and Computation via Quantum Circuit Obfuscation

Published 30 Sep 2026 in quant-ph and cs.CR | (2609.40289v1)

Abstract: We construct protocols for classically verifiable quantum advantage and classical verification of BQP\mathsf{BQP} computations using \emph{quantum indistinguishability obfuscation} (qiO). Specifically, given qiO and assuming a slightly stronger version of BQP≠BPP\mathsf{BQP}\neq\mathsf{BPP}, we construct a two-message quantum-advantage protocol that is efficiently and publicly verifiable. Our result can be viewed as a rigorous cryptographic foundation for the heuristic quantum advantage proposals based on \emph{peaked random circuit sampling} of Aaronson and Zhang (arXiv:2404.14493). We also construct two simple protocols for classically verifying arbitrary BQP\mathsf{BQP} computations. The first protocol is privately verifiable and assumes only the existence of qiO. This gives a rare example of a nontrivial cryptographic application of (quantum) iO that does not make additional computational hardness assumptions. The second protocol additionally assumes post-quantum one-way functions and is \emph{publicly verifiable}. To our knowledge, this is the first publicly verifiable protocol for classical verification of BQP\mathsf{BQP} computations under computational assumptions in the standard model. We show that all our results hold when qiO is assumed only for ancilla-free unitary circuits. As evidence supporting this assumption, we prove a worst-to-average-case reduction for obfuscating such circuits. This reduction extends the local-mixing framework of Canetti, Chamon, Mucciolo and Ruckenstein (TCC 2024) under quantum analogues of their assumptions.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.