Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A mixing time method for estimating the sample complexity of quantum state discrimination

Published 30 Sep 2026 in quant-ph, cs.CC, cs.IT, math.PR, and math.RT | (2609.40182v1)

Abstract: We develop a mixing time method for estimating the sample complexity of quantum state discrimination. We start with considering the minimum-error discrimination of geometrically uniform pure state ensembles, and prove that its sample complexity has a tight estimate given by a quantum homogeneous mixing time [George et al., 2026] and a quantum version of the generalized Dobrushin coefficient [Wolfer, 2020]. This quantum mixing time further reduces to a classical one when the generating group GG forms a Gelfand pair with the stabilizer subgroup HH of the generator state. In this case the generalized Dobrushin coefficient can be fully expressed by representation-theoretic quantities of the commutative Hecke algebra End⁡G(C[G/H])\operatorname{End}_G(\mathbb C[G/H]). In particular, this method reduces the sample complexity estimation of learning quantum coupon collector states [Arunachalam et al., 2020] and learning phase states to classical mixing time problems. We apply this framework to answer the open problems of learning degree-dd phase states over Fq\mathbb F_q in [Alrabiah et al., 2026] and generalized Boolean phase states over Zq\mathbb Z_q [Arunachalam et al., 2023]. The framework also applies to hypergraph state ensembles, giving estimates expressed fully in terms of hypergraph data and recovering estimates for graph state ensembles in [Montanaro and Shao, 2022]. Finally, we extend the discussion to arbitrary mixed state ensembles with uniform priors, prove a sandwiched bound for minimum-error discrimination sample complexity by a quantum weakly mixing time, and provide a tight estimate for the minimax discrimination sample complexity from [D'Ariano et al., 2005] by a Dobrushin-type coefficient. We also discuss the method of strengthened data processing inequality [Gao and Rouz{é}, 2022] and give an upper bound in terms of a strengthened data processing inequality constant.

Authors (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.