Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Electron paramagnetic resonance of Dy3+{^3+}-doped CaWO4_4: spin Hamiltonian, crystal-field analysis, and linear electric field effect

Published 25 Sep 2026 in cond-mat.mtrl-sci | (2609.31208v1)

Abstract: We report an electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) study of Dy<sup>3+{<sup>3+} in CaWO<em>4<em>4 single crystals spanning dopant concentrations from 80~ppb to 247~ppm. The gg factors of the ground Kramers doublet at the S4S_4 point-group site, g</em>∥=7.22±0.01g</em>\parallel = 7.22 \pm 0.01 and g⊥=5.45±0.01g_\perp = 5.45 \pm 0.01, and the hyperfine constants of \ce{{161}Dy} and <sup>163<sup>{163}Dy are determined with an order-of-magnitude improvement in precision over the only previous report. A crystal-field analysis constrained jointly by published optical levels and by the measured gg tensor identifies the ground doublet as the lower branch of an anticrossing between the near-degenerate $|{\pm}11/2&gt;$ and $|{\mp}13/2&gt;$ states, and explains why optical data alone left the gg values unconstrained. \add{The same parameter set, tested on the excited multiplets of the <sup>6H<sup>6H term, reproduces the <sup>6H13/2{}<sup>6H_{13/2} crystal-field levels better than the optical parameters themselves.} The angular dependence of the linewidth in the abab plane reveals broadening by random internal electric fields through the linear electric field effect. Calibrating these fields with the residual Er<sup>3+<sup>{3+} present in the same crystals yields the first electric-field coupling parameters of Dy<sup>3+<sup>3+, (B31<sup>2+B36<sup>2)<sup>1/2</sup></sup></sup>=(34±5)×10<sup>−6(B_{31}<sup>2+B_{36}<sup>2)<sup>{1/2}</sup></sup></sup> = (34\pm5)\times10<sup>{-6}~cm/V, three times the Er<sup>3+<sup>{3+} value and the largest reported for a rare-earth ion in this host.The residual linewidth and the concentration-dependent lineshape asymmetry follow the quadratic field scaling expected for a second-order Stark shift, which escapes the inversion-site cancellation constraining the linear effect. Both couplings trace back to the ∼20\sim 20~cm<sup>−1<sup>{-1} gap to the first opposite-symmetry doublet, a consequence of the dense crystal-field structure of the J=15/2J=15/2 manifold.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.