Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

On Kernels and Leaves: Searching for Bare and Lush Trees

Published 24 Sep 2026 in cs.DS, cs.CC, and cs.DM | (2609.29451v1)

Abstract: We study a variation of the classical Maximum (Minimum) Leaf Spanning Tree problem. In many applications, Depth-First Search (DFS) is used to compute a spanning tree of a graph. Such a search tree is constructed by connecting each vertex vv with the last vertex the search has visited before vv and we call this a last-in tree. By restricting the Maximum (Minimum) Leaf Spanning Tree problem to last-in trees of a graph search, we ask for a search ordering that leads to the largest (smallest) number of leaves in its search tree. Recently, Bergougnoux et al. [Journal of Computer and System Sciences 154 (2025)] have studied the parameterized complexity of these problems for DFS. They showed that the minimization problem is para-NP\mathsf{NP}-hard and the maximization problem is W[1]\mathsf{W}[1]-hard when parameterized by the number of leaves. When parameterized by the number of internal vertices, both problems have polynomial kernels. Here, we examine whether these results also hold for the variant Lexicographic DFS (LDFS). We show that the hardness results of DFS can be transferred to LDFS. We also present exponential kernels for the number of internal vertices as the parameter. We complement this by showing that polynomial kernels do not exist, unless NP⊆coNP/poly\mathsf{NP} \subseteq \mathsf{coNP} / \mathsf{poly}. We also consider last-in trees of searches that do not follow the DFS scheme. In contrast to (L)DFS, minimizing the number of internal vertices is para-NP\mathsf{NP}-hard for several searches including Breadth-First Search.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.