Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

When are bosonic Gaussian states classical to learn?

Published 22 Sep 2026 in quant-ph, cs.IT, cs.LG, and math-ph | (2609.26705v1)

Abstract: A fundamental question in physics is: When does classical behavior emerge from quantum systems? Bosonic Gaussian states provide a natural setting to explore this quantum-classical boundary, as they capture both the classical field behavior and the intrinsic quantum nature of light. Here, we address this problem from a learning-theoretic perspective by asking: When are bosonic Gaussian states classical to learn? That is, under what conditions (if any) can an n-mode bosonic Gaussian state be learned with as few samples, and with operations as simple, as are needed to learn a classical 2n-variate Gaussian distribution? We establish a smooth crossover in learnability governed by the state's thermal fluctuations: - Cold Gaussian states are non-classical to learn: When the covariance matrix satisfies Σ≤(12+O(1n))IΣ\le(\frac12+O(\frac1n))I, i.e. close to the vacuum covariance, tomography under single-copy (i.e., non-entangled) measurements fundamentally requires Ω(n<sup>3)Ω(n<sup>3) copies, strictly exceeding the sample complexity Θ(n<sup>2)Θ(n<sup>2) of learning classical Gaussian distributions. We show that this hardness persists even when few-copy entangled measurements are allowed. - Warm Gaussian states are classical to learn: When thermal fluctuations exceed the vacuum noise, parameterized by Σ≥(12+ν)IΣ\ge(\frac12+ν)I for any parameter $ν&gt;0$, we prove that single-copy tomography requires N=Θ(n<sup>2min⁡(n,1+ν<sup>−1))N=Θ\left(n<sup>2\min(n,1+ν<sup>{-1})\right) copies. This bound is tight and is achieved by simple, non-adaptive, unentangled heterodyne measurements. Crucially, for ν=Ω(1)ν=Ω(1), the sample complexity drops to Θ(n<sup>2)Θ(n<sup>2), matching the classical case. Our results tightly characterize a quantum-to-classical crossover in the learnability of bosonic Gaussian states, reveal a novel connection between fundamental physics and statistical learning theory, and have implications for real-world sensing experiments.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 3 likes about this paper.