Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Solution to Dixmier's Problem about spectra of C*-algebras

Published 22 Sep 2026 in math.OA, math.FA, and math.LO | (2609.26319v1)

Abstract: We solve Dixmier's 1967 problem about spectra of simple C<sup>∗C<sup>*-algebras. A function between spectra is called Borel-definable when it is induced by a Borel map between standard Borel spaces of unitary representations. Let Γ=SL<em>3(Z)Γ=\mathrm{SL}<em>3(\mathbb{Z}), let KK be its completion with respect to the congruence kernels modulo $2n$, let AA be the canonical anticommutation relations (CAR) algebra, and let B=C(K)⋊rΓB=C(K)\rtimes_rΓ be the reduced crossed product. The algebras AA and BB are simple, separable, unital, exact, and antiliminary; AA is nuclear, whereas BB is nonnuclear. There is no Borel-definable injection from the spectrum of BB to the spectrum of AA. In fact, there is a probability measure on the pure-state space of BB such that every Borel lift of a Borel-definable function from the spectrum of BB to the spectrum of AA takes values in a single unitary-equivalence class almost everywhere. Answering a question of Simon Thomas, we also prove that, for every countable amenable group HH, there is no Borel-definable injection from the unitary dual of the free group F</em>∞F</em>\infty on infinitely many generators to the unitary dual of HH. There is a fixed probability measure on a family of infinite-dimensional irreducible representations of F∞F_\infty such that every Borel lift of a Borel-definable function takes values in a single unitary-equivalence class almost everywhere. We also show that, in contrast, the spectra of any two separable nuclear non-type-I C<sup>∗C<sup>*-algebras admit a Borel-definable bijection.

Authors (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.