Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

On the failure of the 12%12\% rule in J/ψJ/ψ and ψ(2S)ψ(2S) decays

Published 21 Sep 2026 in hep-ph | (2609.24961v1)

Abstract: The 12%12\% rule relates hadronic decays of the J/ψJ/ψ and ψ(2S)ψ(2S) through the ratio of their wave functions at the origin, but is strongly violated in several vector--pseudoscalar (VPVP) channels, most prominently in the ρπρπ one. We study these decays within an effective chiral framework including strong and electromagnetic interactions, with the latter implemented through vector meson dominance. The ψ(2S)→VPψ(2S)\to VP data are described well by a relatively minimal model with three free parameters, yielding χ<sup>2</sup>red≃6.71/(11−3)=1.12χ<sup>2_{\rm</sup> red}\simeq 6.71/(11-3)=1.12. In contrast, the corresponding description of the J/ψJ/ψ decays is insufficient (χ<sup>2</sup><em>red≃132/(11−3)=16.5χ<sup>2{\rm</sup> <em>{red}}\simeq 132/(11-3)=16.5) and requires additional SU(3)\mathrm{SU}(3) flavor breaking and electromagnetic contributions for a fair agreement with data: χ<sup>2</sup></em>red≃9.87/(11−6)=1.97χ<sup>2</sup></em>{\rm red}\simeq 9.87/(11-6)= 1.97. In the past, a small mixing of J/ψJ/ψ with an invisible vector glueball was considered as a way to describe the decay patterns. However, we will show that our extended fits are `de facto' equivalent to those where a vector glueball mixes with the J/ψJ/ψ, so that we cannot distinguish whether or not the vector glueball is present. Our results suggest that an important part of the ρπρπ puzzle may arise from additional contributions to the J/ψ→VPJ/ψ\to VP amplitudes rather than from a suppression mechanism specific to the ψ(2S)ψ(2S).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.