Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Statistics, 't Hooft Anomaly, and the Else-Nayak Index: a careful comparison of concepts

Published 17 Sep 2026 in cond-mat.str-el and hep-th | (2609.20813v1)

Abstract: Generalized symmetries and topological excitations, as well as symmetry anomalies and the statistics of topological excitations, are widely believed to be related. There are, however, pitfalls in how this relation is established. A lattice truncation of a symmetry transformation to a finite patch gives a symmetry patch operator that creates symmetry defects at its boundary. This geometric picture resembles a hopping operator creating topological excitations at the boundary of its support, but does not provide well-defined statistics, let alone guarantee agreement with the symmetry anomaly. A more natural and robust relation is that the hopping operators of topological excitations are symmetric: they commute with symmetry transformations. Under suitable assumptions, this condition yields a one-to-one correspondence between statistics and anomalies. We further couple boundary matter to a DW gauge field in one higher dimension to explain this relation from the perspective of gauging. A hopping operator is, in essence, a gauge-invariant operator acting on the physical degrees of freedom after gauging. Once the gauge-field background is fixed, global symmetry comes from gauge transformations that preserve that background, while the symmetric condition on hopping is precisely the remaining gauge invariance. This distinction clarifies potential misconceptions in the literature and provides a more reliable framework for comparing symmetries and topological excitations.

Authors (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.