Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Exact Local Optimality Does Not Compose: The Complexity of Chronological Realization

Published 17 Sep 2026 in quant-ph | (2609.19707v1)

Abstract: The chronological shared realization complexity (CRC) is the smallest normalized stochastic state dimension CseqC_{\rm seq} needed to reproduce a collection of future-response menus using one shared family of controlled transition dynamics. We focus on the rank-tight regime in which both the local realization dimension and the independent-query static carrier width equal KK, thereby isolating the additional dimensional and computational constraints imposed by chronological consistency. This framework also serves as the classical baseline for state-dimension bounds in sequential quantum processes, where stochastic dynamics generalize to completely positive maps. We establish three results in this regime. First, an explicit payload--delay family exhibits an unbounded multiplicative state blow-up: Cloc=Cstat=kC_{\rm loc}=C_{\rm stat}=k while Cseq=k(L+1)C_{\rm seq}=k(L+1), isolating the intrinsic state cost of shared temporal pullbacks. Second, for explicitly listed rational finite menus over a fixed five-letter alphabet with a single Boolean terminal effect, exact shared realizability is ∃R\exists\mathbb{R}-complete, and the zero-versus-inverse-polynomial defect promise problem is PromiseNP\mathsf{PromiseNP}-complete, with local and static optima fixed at KK. Third, a total five-letter chronology compiler translates bounded-rational Intermediate Simplex instances into a polynomially specified regular geometric family over the same fixed alphabet, preserving exact local and static width KK. The compiled family yields strong PromiseNP\mathsf{PromiseNP}-hardness for shared realization on strongly bounded-rational inputs, together with an ∃R\exists\mathbb{R} upper bound certified by an exact polynomial-size finite core. Together, these results show that exact local and static optimality need not compose under chronological sharing, even in the rank-tight regime.

Authors (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.