Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Maximal Kolmogorov Complexity in a Hamming Ball

Published 10 Sep 2026 in cs.IT | (2609.11362v1)

Abstract: The minimal Kolmogorov complexity of a string within Hamming distance r of a given string x is the algorithmic rate-distortion function of x, and Vereshchagin and Vitanyi characterized completely which shapes it can have. This paper is about the opposite extreme. For a binary string x of length n let g_x(r) denote the maximal Kolmogorov complexity of a string within Hamming distance r of x; we study which values, and more generally which functions of r, this quantity can attain. First we characterize, up to an additive error O(log n), the possible values of the triple (C(x),r,g_x(r)): writing r_k for the radius of a Hamming ball of cardinality about 2k, a triple (k,r,l) is realizable if and only if log V(r_k + r) < l < min{n, k+log V(r)}, where V(a) is the cardinality of a ball of radius a. In particular, for r_k+r > n/2 both bounds collapse to n and only l = n is realizable. The two ends of this interval correspond to the two extreme ways of placing a set of complexity k in the cube: a single Hamming ball, where the lower bound comes from Harper's isoperimetric inequality, and an error-correcting code, which for the intermediate parameters we relax to a family of centers with bounded covering multiplicity, in the spirit of list decoding. Then we turn to the function r -> g_x(r) as a whole: we establish four properties that it always has, and show that the minimal and the maximal functions consistent with these properties are both attained, for every complexity level k. Which intermediate profiles are attainable remains open.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.