Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Re-examining the sensitivity of JWST to decaying axion dark matter

Published 9 Sep 2026 in hep-ph and astro-ph.CO | (2609.10674v1)

Abstract: An eV-scale QCD axion comprising the observed dark matter (DM) abundance is expected to generate a photon line at infrared energies that would be observable or near-observable in data collected by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), as might more general axion-like particles (ALPs) over a broader range of masses and couplings. This has motivated a number of efforts to either forecast JWST sensitivities to a QCD axion or realize them through analyses of publicly available datasets. At present, no consensus exists; leading analyses disagree by as much as an order of magnitude in terms of axion-coupling sensitivity, implying an orders-of-magnitude discrepancy in raw flux density sensitivity, and consistency between the analyses and prior forecasts is unclear. We address these outstanding discrepancies with a bespoke data reduction and flexible nonparametric inference procedure that lead to well-controlled and robust limits on the decay of eV-scale axion DM, consistent with previously forecasted sensitivities. We further demonstrate that the strongest previously claimed sensitivities exceed those attainable by any analysis of the datasets from which they were derived. We exclude QCD axion DM for masses between 500 meV500\,\mathrm{meV} and 2.5 eV2.5\,\mathrm{eV} using NIRSpec data, while setting limits on ALP DM complementary to other astrophysical constraints at masses between 100 meV100\,\mathrm{meV} and 500 meV500\,\mathrm{meV}. However, we find the sensitivities to be systematically limited, and therefore unlikely to be improved upon by ongoing data collection or re-analysis unless instrumental modeling and data reduction pipelines improve considerably.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 6 likes about this paper.