Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

When Finite Free Curves Split

Published 9 Sep 2026 in math.AG, math.CA, and math.PR | (2609.10367v1)

Abstract: We characterize equality in the finite free Stam and entropy-power inequalities, proving that Hermite polynomials are the unique extremizers among simple real-rooted inputs, up to independent translations and scalings. The proof turns this classification into a rigidity problem for projective plane curves. Using hyperbolicity and the Helton-Vinnikov theorem, we express the Jacobian defect as an off-diagonal squared norm in a definite symmetric pencil. Together with score transport, this yields a matrix proof of Stam for all real-rooted inputs. For each simple base pair, the directions in which the defect vanishes are the independent translations and common dilation, forming a three-dimensional subspace in every degree whose curves split into nn projective lines. At a collision, the leading configurations are again finite free convolutions of normalized derivatives of the velocity polynomials of the colliding input clusters. Combined with incidence counting, this local formula shows that at most one real fiber is singular, every real singularity is an ordinary totally real multiple point, and the ordered collision multiplicities determine the real normalization covering. For n≥3n\geq3, every non-split curve has at least $2n-2$ non-real projective discriminant zeros, counted with multiplicity, with equality attained by irreducible curves of geometric genus zero through every simple input pair. The leading Fisher-information coefficient is determined by the colliding tangent configurations, while the finite entropy term retains the gaps between clusters. For n≥3n\geq3, maximal logarithmic entropy divergence along the optimally weighted score direction is equivalent to Stam equality.

Authors (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 11 likes about this paper.