On the Limits of Quantum Multiparty Simultaneous Communication

Abstract: The Simultaneous Message Passing (SMP) model provides a fundamental framework for comparing classical and quantum communication. For two players, Gavinsky et al. (STOC 2006) established a separation underlying the incomparability of shared randomness and quantum communication: \textsc{Index Coordination} needs $O(\log n)$ public-coin bits but $Ω(n<sup>{1/3})$ bounded-error qubits. In this work, we establish a multiparty exponential separation through $\operatorname{IC}_{k,n}$, a natural $k$-party generalization of \textsc{Index Coordination}. Public-coin protocols solve it unambiguously with maximum message length $O(\log n)$ bits. In contrast, quantum SMP protocols without shared entanglement or public coins require maximum message length $Ω(n<sup>{1-1/k})$ qubits in the unambiguous regime and $Ω(n<sup>{(k-1)/(k+1)})$ qubits in the bounded-error regime. A classical private-coin protocol matches the unambiguous bound, so quantum communication provides no asymptotic advantage over private randomness in this regime. For fixed error parameters, all constants are independent of $k$, establishing the exponential separation for every integer-valued function $k=k(n)\ge2$, without restricting its growth. Both quantum lower bounds become $Ω(n)$ when $k\ge c\log n$ for any fixed $c&gt;0$, matching the full-input protocol and yielding tight linear complexity in both regimes. Our results demonstrate that quantum superposition cannot efficiently simulate the coordination afforded by public randomness, extending this separation to arbitrary $k$. To bound success probabilities for multiparty product states, we prove an exact factorization theorem for unambiguous quantum state identification, which may be of independent mathematical interest.