Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Counterexamples for BFGS-type methods under arbitrary strong Wolfe constants

Published 9 Sep 2026 in math.OC | (2609.09686v1)

Abstract: Whether the Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) method and its variants can fail to converge on smooth nonconvex functions under realistic line-search parameters has remained a central open problem in quasi-Newton theory since the landmark counterexample of Dai (2002), which was confined to small Armijo parameters (c1≤1/84≈0.0119c_1 \le 1/84 \approx 0.0119 on Powell's geometry, or c1≤69/7480≈0.0092c_1 \le 69/7480 \approx 0.0092 on his six-point cycle) and an objective function unbounded below. In this paper, we resolve the long-standing open question, posed by Dai (2002) following a discussion with J. C. Gilbert, of whether such counterexamples exist in theory for every Armijo parameter c1∈(0,1)c_1 \in (0, 1). Specifically, for every prescribed pair of line-search parameters $0 &lt; c_1 &lt; c_2 &lt; 1$, we construct an objective function f∈C<sup>∞(R<sup>2)f \in C<sup>\infty(\mathbb{R}<sup>2), bounded below and with Lipschitz continuous gradient, on which every method in a broad conjugacy class C\mathcal{C} equipped with the first-local-minimizer line search generates an infinite sequence of iterates with ∣∇f(xk)∣=1|\nabla f(x_k)| = 1 for all k≥0k \ge 0. The class C\mathcal{C} encompasses the classical full-memory BFGS method, limited-memory BFGS (L-BFGS) with arbitrary memory m≥1m \ge 1, the Broyden positive family, and the Hestenes-Stiefel conjugate gradient method. The steps are the standard first local minimizers along the search rays and simultaneously satisfy the strong Wolfe, weak Wolfe, Armijo, and Goldstein conditions with constants (c1,c2)(c_1, c_2). The construction operates in the minimal possible dimension n=2n = 2, exploiting a non-decaying conjugate descent orbit in the plane coupled with an explicit tubular interpolation whose two-bump axial curvature profile places the Armijo ratio anywhere in (0,1)(0, 1).

Authors (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.