Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Additive diameters and covering complexity of irreducible representations

Published 3 Sep 2026 in math.RT, math.AG, math.GR, and math.RA | (2609.03882v1)

Abstract: Let a group GG act linearly on a finite-dimensional complex vector space VV. The group-additive diameter of a subspace UVU \leq V is the least number of translates of UU whose sum is all of VV. Counting dimensions, it is at least dimV/dimU\dim V / \dim U. We show that when GG is compact and VV is irreducible, the diameter of every nonzero subspace is at most (dimV/dimU)lndimV\lceil (\dim V / \dim U) \ln \dim V \rceil, so the trivial bound is correct up to a logarithmic factor. We measure the discrepancy by the covering complexity C(V)\mathsf{C}(V), the largest ratio between the diameter of any subspace and its trivial lower bound, so that 1C(V)2+lndimV1 \leq \mathsf{C}(V) \leq 2 + \ln \dim V, and we determine where in this range various representations lie. Every irreducible representation of SL2(C)\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbf{C}) has C(V)=1\mathsf{C}(V) = 1. The logarithm can be genuinely present along families of symmetric and exterior powers of SLn(C)\mathrm{SL}_n(\mathbf{C}) with nn varying, and it is present for finite Heisenberg groups and $2$-transitive groups of small order such as PSL2(Fp)\mathrm{PSL}_2(\mathbf{F}_p). The complexity is bounded above by a constant on the conjugation representations of SLn(C)\mathrm{SL}_n(\mathbf{C}) and on the representations Sym<sup>k</sup>C<sup>3\operatorname{Sym}<sup>k</sup> \mathbf{C}<sup>3 of SL3(C)\mathrm{SL}_3(\mathbf{C}). On the other hand, every fixed connected reductive group has a family of irreducible representations whose complexities tend to at least the dimension of the flag variety. Finally, for the Lie algebra sl3(C)\mathfrak{sl}_3(\mathbf{C}) acting on Sym<sup>k</sup>C<sup>3\operatorname{Sym}<sup>k</sup> \mathbf{C}<sup>3, the monomial diameter with respect to Sym<sup>k</sup>X\operatorname{Sym}<sup>k</sup> X for a plane XC<sup>3X \leq \mathbf{C}<sup>3 is optimal, while the corresponding SL3(C)\mathrm{SL}_3(\mathbf{C}) diameter is not.

Authors (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.