Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Relative approximation degrees and the henselian rationality problem over perfect fields

Published 3 Sep 2026 in math.AC and math.AG | (2609.03451v1)

Abstract: Let (F∣K,w)(F|K,w) be an immediate valued function field of transcendence degree one over a rank-one perfect valued field (K,v)(K,v) of characteristic $p&gt;0$. It is henselian rational if F<sup>h=K(Y)<sup>hF<sup>h=K(Y)<sup>h for some Y∈F<sup>hY\in F<sup>h. Kuhlmann proved henselian rationality over tame fields; we investigate how far his method extends to perfect fields. Relative approximation degrees are a central ingredient in Kuhlmann's approach. We first complete their theory over henselian fields by proving the existence of the relative approximation degree and constant of every polynomial, including for pseudo-convergent sequences of algebraic type. Using the jj-invariants of associated monomial valuations, we describe these invariants directly through Taylor expansions and extend the henselian degree bound of Kuhlmann and Vlahu. We next study the Artin--Schreier reduction underlying the henselian rationality argument. Over perfect fields, every polynomial is Artin--Schreier equivalent to one whose relative approximation degree lies in 1,p{1,p}. We construct an explicit rank-one example showing that pp cannot always be reduced to one modulo the Artin--Schreier image of K[X]K[X]. Nevertheless, reduction to degree one becomes possible in this example after passing to equivalence modulo the Artin--Schreier image of K(X)<sup>hK(X)<sup>h, and the resulting Artin--Schreier function field is henselian rational. Finally, assume that KK equals its absolute ramification field, and let L=IC(F∣K,w)L=IC(F|K,w) be the relative algebraic closure of KK in F<sup>hF<sup>h. We prove that F<sup>hF<sup>h is henselian rational over LL, and that henselian rationality descends to KK whenever L∣KL|K is finite. This finiteness condition holds whenever some separating transcendental element induces an extension of Type II, yielding henselian rationality in this case.

Authors (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.