Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A thickness boundary and modular obstructions for two-set radial projections

Published 3 Sep 2026 in math.CA and math.DS | (2609.03400v1)

Abstract: Let Ka,mK_{a,m} and Kb,nK_{b,n} be missing-digit Cantor sets with initial consecutive digit sets, and write ca=m/(a−1)c_a=m/(a-1) and cb=n/(b−1)c_b=n/(b-1). We prove that if ca+cb≥1c_a+c_b\geq 1, then the radial projection of Ka,m×Kb,nK_{a,m}\times K_{b,n} from every observer has nonempty interior; no multiplicative-independence assumption is needed for this implication. Conversely, when the bases are multiplicatively independent and $c_a+c_b&lt;1$, we exhibit explicit unbounded open sets of observers for which the radial image is compact and nowhere dense. Rational observers with the same property are dense in each exterior corner region and occur arbitrarily close to the four corners of the product. Thus ca+cb=1c_a+c_b=1 is the exact threshold for the all-observers interior property within the multiplicatively independent initial-block family. In particular, this supplies an explicit two-set counterexample to the nonempty-interior conclusions of two conjectures of Yu. We also establish a sufficient modular phase obstruction for affine translates of such sets. Combining it with a fixed-pin positive-measure theorem of Banaji and Yu yields consecutive-block division sets that are compact, perfect, of positive Lebesgue measure, and nowhere dense, with both factor dimensions tending to one. For the same family, Fourier l<sup>1l<sup>1-dimension estimates and the incidence argument used in Yu's product theorem imply that the two self-products contain intervals for all sufficiently large rr and ss, while the cross-division set remains nowhere dense.

Authors (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.