Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Dimension Dependent Correlation Gap Bounds under Restricted Independence

Published 2 Sep 2026 in math.PR, cs.LG, and math.CO | (2609.02659v1)

Abstract: The pairwise independent correlation gap is the ratio of the maximum expected value of a set function under arbitrary dependence to that under pairwise independence, measuring the loss from this independence restriction. Under mutual independence, this gap is universally bounded by e/(e−1)e/(e-1) for monotone submodular functions. With pairwise independence, a tighter $4/3$ upper bound was established for several special cases, including n=3n=3, and conjectured to hold universally. A recent AI-assisted counterexample disproved this conjecture for n=5n=5, leaving the validity of the n=4n=4 bound and the tight worst case bound open. We resolve both questions. First, for n=4n=4, we establish that the $4/3$ bound holds universally and is tight using an AI-assisted proof combining theoretical analysis and computational verification. The proof combines a structural characterization of optimal numerator vertices, permutation symmetry, cone certificate systems, Bernstein polynomial representations, recursive simplex subdivision, and verification of $2,745$ Bernstein coefficient systems. Second, we show that the worst case pairwise independent correlation gap attains e/(e−1)e/(e-1) asymptotically by constructing an instance with identical marginal probabilities and a monotone submodular union coverage function on a ground set partitioned into mm blocks. The number of blocks grows sublinearly with the ground set size. The result follows by constructing a feasible solution to a scaled asymptotic reduced dual of the pairwise independent linear program and immediately extends to tt-wise independent random elements (t≥2t\ge2), since tt-wise independence implies pairwise independence. Thus, pairwise independence, despite being the least restrictive form of independence in the tt-wise independence hierarchy, can be as restrictive as mutual independence in the worst case.

Authors (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.