Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Event-Inference Reliability for Physical AI over Wireless Networks

Published 31 Aug 2026 in eess.SP | (2608.30663v1)

Abstract: Wireless-enabled physical artificial intelligence (physical AI) systems call for a shift from reliable data delivery to reliable inference of physical events. The relevant question is not only whether packets arrive, but whether the set of cues available at the decision node, i.e., the evidence, is sufficiently timely and informative to support reliable inference about the event. Accordingly, this paper develops a framework in which event-inference reliability (EIR) is determined jointly by cue informativeness, cue availability, and temporal admissibility. The latter is determined by the downstream task requirement and represented through the usefulness horizon. We define event-inference error ratio (EIER) as the normalised residual event uncertainty after incorporating admitted cues, and EIR as the corresponding normalised uncertainty reduction, both conditioned on decision-node context. We further distinguish the evidence-limited Bayes benchmark from operational performance of a particular inference engine and derive an entropy-based lower bound on the minimum achievable event error from the same decision-node information. The framework then enables an event-aware wireless design interface for cue prioritisation, cue-reliability allocation, and event-inference coverage characterisation. A multiclass indoor activity-inference study combining empirical cue likelihoods with wireless delivery instantiates the framework and demonstrates how it characterises EIR under finite usefulness horizons.

Authors (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.