Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Bias-Corrected Machine-Learning Estimation of Chiral Condensate Cumulants: A Retrospective Lattice QCD Case Study

Published 31 Aug 2026 in hep-lat | (2608.30416v1)

Abstract: We present a retrospective case study of bias-corrected ML estimates of traces of the inverse Dirac operator, Tr M<sup>−n\text{Tr}\,M<sup>{-n} (n=1,2,3,4n=1,2,3,4), using a fixed lattice QCD dataset and examining how the results depend on the relative proportions of the labeled and training sets. Two supervised learning approaches are examined: one using Tr M<sup>−1\text{Tr}\,M<sup>{-1} as the input feature, and the other employing gauge observables such as the plaquette and rectangle. Beyond the direct estimation of Tr M<sup>−n\text{Tr}\,M<sup>{-n}, we further investigate two derived applications of the ML estimations: the evaluation of the cumulants of the chiral condensate within a single ensemble and that obtained through multi-ensemble reweighting across ensembles with different quark masses. Within this fixed dataset, the bias-corrected estimates show close agreement with the full-data reference under the adopted evaluation criteria, while the uncorrected estimates can exhibit amplified deviations after the nonlinear cumulant and reweighting steps. For the approach using Tr M<sup>−1\text{Tr}\,M<sup>{-1} as the input feature, nominal solve-count accounting suggests that the Dirac-inversion cost could be reduced to approximately 25.75%25.75\% of that of the conventional calculation in the present setup. This value is a cost projection rather than an end-to-end benchmark: it assumes comparable costs for successive inversions and excludes model-training and analysis overhead.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.