Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

ExoMOD I. A Forward Model for the Orbital Architecture of Kepler Multi-Planet Systems

Published 28 Aug 2026 in astro-ph.EP and astro-ph.IM | (2608.28548v1)

Abstract: Transit observations only detect planets with favorable, near edge-on orientation of orbits as seen by a distant observer, which leaves much freedom for various interpretations in terms of the underlying planetary system architecture. Here we forward model transit observations of the Kepler telescope to characterize the orbital properties of close-in planetary systems. We make sensible choices about the underlying distributions of planet radii, masses and orbital periods, parameterize the orbital excitation with the Angular Momentum Deficit (AMD), and adopt an accurate method to account for transit detection. The fits to Kepler's DR25 data are executed with {\tt MultiNest}. We find that the orbital period distributions of Kepler singles and multis are statistically different from each other -- possibly a consequence of Kepler's observational baseline. The observed gap complexity distribution is reproduced when planets in high multiplicity systems (m≥5m \geq 5) are assigned ideally correlated period ratios. The high-multiplicity systems probably retained a memory of their formation conditions. The gap complexity metric also helps to constrain the AMD distribution. We find that systems with positive radius monotonicities typically harbor smaller planets, as expected if the radius monotonicity is influenced by non-detections. A FGK dwarf in the Kepler field should host ≃2.4±0.2\simeq 2.4 \pm 0.2 planets on average with radii $0.5 < R_{\rm pl}/R_\oplus < 7$ and orbital periods $3<P_{\rm orb}<300$ d. For a detected planetary system, there is roughly a 50\% chance that Kepler transit observations missed at least one inner or intermediate-period planet.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.