Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

The Mass Dependence of the Fundamental Metallicity Relation in Observations and Simulations

Published 25 Aug 2026 in astro-ph.GA | (2608.24826v1)

Abstract: The metal content of galaxies provides direct insight into the underlying physical processes that drive galaxy evolution. An example of this is the three-parameter relationship between stellar mass, gas-phase metallicity, and star formation rate, commonly referred to as the Fundamental Metallicity Relation (FMR). Previous studies have suggested that the FMR is redshift-invariant (at z≲4z \lesssim 4) and fully accounts for the scatter in the mass-metallicity relation (MZR). In this work, we test this 'fundamental' relation in both cosmological simulations (EAGLE, SIMBA, Illustris, IllustrisTNG) and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) observations. We find that the canonical anti-correlation between metallicity and specific star formation rate (sSFR) inverts in massive galaxies (M⋆≳10<sup>10.5</sup>M⊙M_\star \gtrsim 10<sup>{10.5}</sup> \mathrm{M}_\odot) in EAGLE, IllustrisTNG, and SDSS. When including lower star forming galaxies, the positive correlation appears for all four simulations and SDSS. We speculate that this inversion may being driven by strong nuclear outflows (from, e.g., active galactic nuclei or stellar feedback), which quench star formation while simultaneously expelling preferentially enriched gas from the center of the galaxy. We also find that this 'inversion' appears in a number of metallicity diagnostics in observations (though the details depend on diagnostic) and persists out to z∼1z \sim 1 in the simulations. These results demonstrate that these strong nuclear outflows challenge simple gas regulator-type models and provide a new framework to test models of the baryon cycle in both future simulations and observations.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.