Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Parallel Quantum Advantage with Limited Adaptivity Requires Structure

Published 20 Aug 2026 in quant-ph | (2608.20297v1)

Abstract: Aaronson and Ambainis (Theory of Computing, 2014) conjectured that quantum query algorithms admit efficient almost-everywhere classical simulation: for any TT-query quantum algorithm, its acceptance probability can be approximated on a (1δ)(1-δ) fraction of inputs, up to εε additive error, using poly(T,1/ε,1/δ)\mathrm{poly}(T, 1/ε, 1/δ) classical queries. At a high level, the conjecture suggests that exponential quantum speedups are possible only on sufficiently structured inputs. In this work, we make progress on this conjecture by proving it for quantum algorithms that make massively parallel quantum queries. In contrast, Yamakawa and Zhandry (Journal of the ACM, 2024) showed that quantum algorithms restricted to parallel queries can still achieve exponential speedups over classical algorithms for sampling problems. We establish our simulation theorem by proving the stronger statement that parallel-query quantum algorithms cannot distinguish the uniform distribution over oracles from oracles drawn from so-called "dense distributions". Our main technical contribution is a coupling theorem that relates the uniform distribution over oracles to oracles drawn from dense distributions. We further extend this approach beyond the purely parallel setting, obtaining simulation theorems both for algorithms with a bounded quantum-query prefix followed by a massively parallel quantum-query stage, and for hybrid algorithms that make an arbitrary polynomial number of adaptive classical queries before the massively parallel quantum-query stage. Finally, using the parallel-query simulation theorem as a base case, we obtain simulation theorems for quantum algorithms with constant rounds of adaptivity.

Authors (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.