Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A Note on Topological Hochschild Homology Relative to $\Sphere_{W(k)}[x_0,x_1,\ldots,x_n]$

Published 20 Aug 2026 in math.AT | (2608.19829v1)

Abstract: We explain the relation between the relative topological Hochschild homology $\THH(R/\Sphere_{W(k)}[x_0,\ldots,x_n])$ and the Nygaard completed Frobenius twisted relative prismatic cohomology $\widehat{\Prism}<sup>{(1)}_{R/W(k)[x_0,\ldots,x_n]<sup>\wedge}$, where W(k)[x0,x1,,xn]RW(k)[x_0,x_1,\ldots,x_n]\rightarrow R is relatively quasiregular semiperfectoid. As an application, for R=Zp[x]/(px)R=\Z_p[x]/(px), we compute $π_*\THH(R)<sup>\wedge_p$ by descent along $\THH(R)<sup>\wedge_p\rightarrow</sup> \THH(R/\Sphere_p[z,x])$, where R=Zp[x]/(px)R=\Z_p[x]/(px) is regarded as an $\Einfty$-$\Sphere_p[z,x]$-algebra through $\Sphere_p[z,x]\xrightarrow{z\mapsto p,x\mapsto x}\Z_p[x]/(px)$.

Authors (1)

Summary

  • The paper identifies relative THH, TC−, and TP over spherical polynomial bases with graded pieces of Nygaard-completed, Frobenius-twisted relative prismatic cohomology.
  • The paper develops explicit prismatic-envelope generators and uses them to describe relative THH homotopy groups through divided-power algebras under quasiregular semiperfectoid hypotheses.
  • The paper computes a multiplicative E²-page for the descent spectral sequence of THH(ℤp[x]/(px))p̂, which collapses by degree reasons but retains unresolved extension and multiplicative-structure problems.

This paper by Jingbang Guo establishes an identification between relative topological Hochschild homology over the spherical polynomial base Bn=SW(k)[x0,,xn]B_n = S_{W(k)}[x_0,\ldots,x_n] and Nygaard-completed Frobenius-twisted relative prismatic cohomology, and applies this machinery to compute a descent spectral sequence for THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge. The work synthesizes techniques from Bhatt–Morrow–Scholze, Bhatt–Scholze, Antieau–Krause–Nikolaus, and Liu–Wang into a uniform statement for relatively quasiregular semiperfectoid maps out of BnB_n.

Relative THH and cyclotomic bases

The foundational setup concerns THH(/E)THH(-/E) for EE-rings. The author recalls that while THH(A)=THH(A/S)THH(A) = THH(A/\mathbb{S}) carries a canonical cyclotomic structure, relative THHTHH generally does not; the obstruction is the absence of a Tate diagonal for general bases (e.g., D(Z)\mathbb{D}(\mathbb{Z}), by Nikolaus–Scholze). The relevant class of bases admitting a cyclotomic lift of THH(/E)THH(-/E) is that of cyclotomic bases in the sense of Liu–Wang. The key observation is that if EE is a THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge0-complete connective THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge1-ring with THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge2 a perfect ring concentrated in degree zero — as holds for spherical Witt vectors THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge3 and for their polynomial extensions THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge4, whose cyclotomic Frobenius sends THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge5 — then THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge6 is an equivalence, so THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge7 is an equivalence for any THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge8-algebra THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge9. This justifies treating BnB_n0 as a stand-in for the sphere spectrum in prismatic computations, with the BnB_n1-ring BnB_n2 carrying BnB_n3.

The main identification

The central result identifies homotopy groups of relative BnB_n4, BnB_n5, and BnB_n6 with graded pieces of relative prismatic cohomology data. For a map BnB_n7 that is relatively quasiregular semiperfectoid — meaning BnB_n8 has bounded BnB_n9-power torsion and is THH(/E)THH(-/E)0-complete, the map is surjective, THH(/E)THH(-/E)1 contains a distinguished ideal THH(/E)THH(-/E)2, and THH(/E)THH(-/E)3 has THH(/E)THH(-/E)4-complete Tor-amplitude concentrated in degree THH(/E)THH(-/E)5 — the paper proves:

THH(/E)THH(-/E)6

with analogous statements for THH(/E)THH(-/E)7, and with the canonical map and cyclotomic Frobenius corresponding respectively to Nygaard filtration inclusions and the composition THH(/E)THH(-/E)8.

The proof strategy is descent along Frobenius perfection. Base-changing along THH(/E)THH(-/E)9 reduces to the case of ordinary quasiregular semiperfectoids, where the BMS/BS identification of EE0 with EE1 applies. Two base-change compatibilities drive the argument: prismatic cohomology satisfies base change in the prism (by AKN), and EE2 satisfies flat base change since EE3 is EE4-completely faithfully flat. Flat descent then recovers the absolute statement. Notably, the author attributes the key idea to BMS Proposition 11.10 and notes that Krause has announced a more general version allowing arbitrary bases and full generality of prismatic cohomology relative to EE5-rings; the present note is thus positioned as an expository consolidation with concrete applications rather than maximal generality.

Prismatic envelopes and explicit generators

To make the abstract identification computable, the paper analyzes prismatic envelopes EE6 for quotients EE7 with EE8 distinguished principal and the EE9 Koszul regular mod THH(A)=THH(A/S)THH(A) = THH(A/\mathbb{S})0. Two technical lemmas are established: first, the elements THH(A)=THH(A/S)THH(A) = THH(A/\mathbb{S})1 defined recursively via the THH(A)=THH(A/S)THH(A) = THH(A/\mathbb{S})2-structure satisfy THH(A)=THH(A/S)THH(A) = THH(A/\mathbb{S})3 inside the envelope, hence lie in THH(A)=THH(A/S)THH(A) = THH(A/\mathbb{S})4; second, they obey the divided-power-type relation THH(A)=THH(A/S)THH(A) = THH(A/\mathbb{S})5. Under either of two hypotheses — THH(A)=THH(A/S)THH(A) = THH(A/\mathbb{S})6 THH(A)=THH(A/S)THH(A) = THH(A/\mathbb{S})7-torsion-free with THH(A)=THH(A/S)THH(A) = THH(A/\mathbb{S})8 for all THH(A)=THH(A/S)THH(A) = THH(A/\mathbb{S})9, or THHTHH0 with THHTHH1 — the author concludes:

THHTHH2

where THHTHH3 corresponds to the class of THHTHH4 and THHTHH5 to THHTHH6 up to units. The second hypothesis is handled by a reduction to the first via adjoining variables THHTHH7 with THHTHH8 and mapping THHTHH9 to D(Z)\mathbb{D}(\mathbb{Z})0. When D(Z)\mathbb{D}(\mathbb{Z})1 has D(Z)\mathbb{D}(\mathbb{Z})2-torsion, the divided power structures require the specification given by these generators, which the author notes explicitly.

Application: the descent spectral sequence for D(Z)\mathbb{D}(\mathbb{Z})3

Following the Liu–Wang strategy for D(Z)\mathbb{D}(\mathbb{Z})4, the paper computes D(Z)\mathbb{D}(\mathbb{Z})5 for D(Z)\mathbb{D}(\mathbb{Z})6 via descent along D(Z)\mathbb{D}(\mathbb{Z})7, where D(Z)\mathbb{D}(\mathbb{Z})8, D(Z)\mathbb{D}(\mathbb{Z})9. The coskeleton filtration yields a multiplicative second-quadrant spectral sequence whose THH(/E)THH(-/E)0-page is computed as THH(/E)THH(-/E)1 over the Hopf algebroid

THH(/E)THH(-/E)2

The right unit acts by THH(/E)THH(-/E)3 and a nontrivial formula on THH(/E)THH(-/E)4 involving both difference classes. Since THH(/E)THH(-/E)5 is concentrated in even degrees, the spectral sequence collapses at THH(/E)THH(-/E)6 for degree reasons. The author constructs a short resolution by relative injectives (in Ravenel's sense), reducing the cobar complex to a three-term complex governed by explicit differential operators THH(/E)THH(-/E)7 (an THH(/E)THH(-/E)8-linear derivation-like operator mixing THH(/E)THH(-/E)9-degree and EE0-degree through multiplication by EE1) and EE2 (EE3-linear, sending EE4).

The resulting EE5-page exhibits genuinely intricate structure. In summary form:

Position Value
EE6 EE7
EE8, EE9 THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge00
THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge01 THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge02
THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge03 THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge04
THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge05, THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge06 non-split extension of THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge07 by torsion terms
THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge08 THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge09
THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge10, THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge11 THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge12

Here THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge13 is an explicit alternating sum involving denominators THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge14, reflecting the interplay between the THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge15-adic valuation of THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge16 and division by THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge17 in THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge18. The THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge19 column fits non-split exact sequences; when THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge20, an additional summand THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge21 appears, recording the failure of invertibility of THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge22 in THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge23. The author also observes that from the THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge24-page onward the spectral sequence depends only on THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge25 itself, being identifiable with the motivic-filtration spectral sequence à la BMS Proposition 7.13, i.e., computing THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge26.

Limitations and open questions

Two significant gaps are conceded directly. First, the extension problem for the spectral sequence remains unsolved, and the multiplicative structure on the THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge27-page is not specified; consequently the computation determines THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge28 only up to hidden extensions. The author states that a forthcoming joint work with Wei Yang will resolve both by constructing a suitable DGA model. Second, the main theorem is stated under a deliberately restricted definition of relative quasiregular semiperfectoid requiring surjectivity of THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge29; the more general framework of AKN would remove this hypothesis, and the fully general statement (arbitrary bases, motivic filtrations on all of THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge30, THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge31, THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge32) is deferred to Krause's announced work. Additionally, the identification of the spectral sequence with the motivic filtration relies on results cited from ABBK and AKN rather than being proved self-containedly here.

Conclusion

The paper provides a clean, usable bridge between relative THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge33 over spherical polynomial bases and relative prismatic cohomology, together with explicit generator-level control of the relevant prismatic envelopes. Its concrete payoff is a fully collapsed, explicitly computed THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge34-page for the descent spectral sequence converging to THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge35, exhibiting nontrivial torsion phenomena tied to the arithmetic of THH(Zp[x]/(px))pTHH(\mathbb{Z}_p[x]/(px))_p^\wedge36. The remaining extension problem and multiplicative structure constitute the natural next target, which the author addresses in subsequent work.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.